Introduction to Agile

docx

School

Grand Canyon University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

160

Subject

Management

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by SuperHumanViperPerson191

Report
1 Introduction to Agile Part 1 The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) serves as a widely recognized industry standard for implementing agile and lean practices across organizations. Within the SAFe framework, the lean business case emerges as a pivotal component, distinguishing itself from the more intricate structure of a conventional business case. Unlike its comprehensive counterpart, the lean business case offers a streamlined approach, emphasizing efficiency and adaptability, especially in dynamic environments. In contrast to the exhaustive documentation provided by a traditional business case, the lean business case is designed to help save time and thrive in agile decision making scenarios. While a traditional business case excels in situations where stability and meticulous planning are imperative, such as large scale infrastructure projects, the lean business case finds its forte in nimble decision making contexts. This is especially true for innovative projects or seasoned teams adept at navigating uncertainties. Ultimately, the selection between a traditional and lean business case depends on the specific nature and requirements of the project, as well as the demand for either comprehensive planning or adaptability. The traditional approach suits projects characterized by stability and well defined parameters, while the lean methodology is very effective in agile, change responsive environments. It's a matter of aligning the chosen business case with the specific/unique demands of the project at hand, ultimately ensuring a tailored and effective approach to project management. Part 2 The Agile Manifesto, which is a guiding philosophy in Agile software development, was conceived to address challenges in an uncertain and rapidly changing environment. The term "Agile" was chosen to signify the approach's emphasis on adaptability and responsiveness to change, recognizing the importance of navigating uncertainties effectively. Agile software development extends beyond just specific frameworks, like Scrum or Extreme Programming, and includes a set of values and principles articulated in the Manifesto and its accompanying 12 Principles. Two major Agile principles underscore the essence of this methodology. Firstly, "Working software is the primary measure of progress" prioritizes tangible outcomes over extensive documentation, ensuring that any progress is measurable and focused on delivering value. Secondly, "Welcome changing requirements, even late in development" highlights the adaptability of Agile, allowing for modifications in response to evolving project needs. Agile's distinctive feature lies in its emphasis on people and collaboration. It encourages self organizing cross functional teams, promoting a collaborative environment where solutions are enhanced through teamwork. While managers still play a role in facilitating success, Agile teams have the autonomy to figure out their approach. Agile methodologies, like Scrum and XP, are recognized as frameworks that teams can adapt to their unique contexts, emphasizing flexibility and continuous improvement. In summary, Agile is a mindset guided by the Agile Manifesto's values and principles, promoting adaptability, collaboration, and a focus on delivering value. The two selected Agile principles emphasize the importance of measurable progress and the flexibility to embrace changing requirements. Agile methodologies, as frameworks, provide a structure that
2 teams can tailor to their specific needs, making it applicable beyond software development to various organizational activities. Part 3 Project management methodologies play a crucial role in determining the success of any project, and two widely used approaches are Agile and Waterfall. The Waterfall methodology is a linear and sequential model that follows a more structured path from the project's initiation to its completion. In contrast, Agile is an iterative and flexible approach that allows for continuous adjustments throughout the development process. One of the key differences between the two lies in their handling of project requirements. Waterfall relies on a comprehensive and fixed set of requirements defined at the project's outset. This makes it best for projects where the scope is well understood, changes are minimal, and there is a clear roadmap to follow. For example, if an organization is constructing a building and the architectural plans are well defined, the Waterfall model provides a clear framework for implementation. Conversely, Agile thrives in environments where requirements are expected to evolve/change. It handles changes by really breaking down the project into much smaller increments. These are called iterations, and they prioritize collaboration and adaptability. In software development, where user needs can change frequently/quickly, Agile allows for regular reassessment and adjustments to ensure the final product aligns with customer expectations. Consider a scenario where a company is developing a new software application. If the project demands a stable and well defined scope, with minimal anticipated changes, the Waterfall approach may be best. However, in a situation where the project involves creating a dynamic mobile application in a market with rapidly changing trends, Agile becomes the preferred choice. Agile enables the development team to respond quickly to user feedback and evolving market demands, ensuring the final product remains competitive. Another critical factor to consider is project risk. Waterfall's rigid structure makes it challenging to incorporate changes once the project is underway, and any deviations from the initial plan can lead to delays and increased costs. On the other hand, Agile embraces change, allowing for continuous improvement and reducing the risk of delivering a product that no longer meets stakeholder needs. The decision between Agile and Waterfall should also take into account the organizational culture and the team's expertise. Some organizations, particularly those in industries with rapidly changing landscapes, may find Agile more aligned with their values and objectives. Others, in more stable environments, may prefer the predictability of Waterfall. In conclusion, the choice between Agile and Waterfall really depends on the specific requirements and needs of the project that is being worked on. Waterfall is best for well defined projects with minimal changes expected, while Agile excels in dynamic environments where adaptability and continuous feedback are paramount. Organizations should carefully evaluate their project characteristics, risk tolerance, and team dynamics to determine the most appropriate methodology, or even consider a hybrid approach that combines elements of both methodologies for a tailored solution. References
3 Alliance, A., Kilby, M., & Button, B. (2024, January 26). What is Agile Software Development? . Agile Alliance |. https://www.agilealliance.org/agile101/ Atlassian. (n.d.). Agile vs. Waterfall Project Management . https://www.atlassian.com/agile/project-management/project-management-intro Lockhart, L. (2023, February 15). Agile vs. waterfall: 10 key differences between the two methods . Float. https://www.float.com/resources/agile-vs-waterfall/#:~:text=Time %20frames%3A%20The%20waterfall%20method,and%20achieve%20shorter%20time %20frames. What is safe - framework for business agility . Scaled Agile. (2024, January 12). https://scaledagile.com/what-is-safe/
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help