M3.6_Team_Evaluation worksheet

docx

School

Anna Maria College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

L710

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by ChancellorMusic2103

M3.6 Team Evaluation This exercise asks you to evaluate your performance as a team while working on the collaborative report. Complete this document and submit it to USF Writes. Part 1: Self evaluation Please describe your specific contributions to the team. Your answers to the questions below can be a bulleted list or short summary paragraph. Collaboration Reflection 1. In general, how do you feel the team worked together? How does this compare to other teams you've worked in? What specifically did you learn about collaborating productively? 2. Were there any specific obstacles your team had to overcome? How well do you feel your team handled this situation? What skills did your team use to overcome obstacles? 3. Identify conflicts your team encountered and explain how those conflicts were managed? How else could you have handled those conflicts? Are you satisfied with the resolution? Would you handle the conflict differently if you handled the situation now? 4. How did you motivate and provide assistance or encouragement to teammates? 5. How did the team contract/charter help you think through the process of collaborating? Did you refer back to the contract/charter as you worked? Did your team’s contract/charter overlook any aspects of collaboration that you wish, in hindsight, it had addressed? Team Evaluation Your Name: Alejandro De Armas Date: 11/26 Remember: This evaluation should be in first person. You should be reflecting honestly on this project and on your and your team members’ contributions to completing the assigned deliverables. Refer back to your team charter to help you make an accurate assessment. Only your instructor will read your responses. Section #1: Evaluate your own contribution to the team Please place an “X” in each row to indicate your evaluation of your own work. ● Professional = Exceeded all expectations and/or exceptionally completed project tasks as assigned ● Adequate = Consistently fulfilled all expectations and/or project tasks as assigned ● Inadequate = Inadequately fulfilled expectations and/or incompletely or insufficiently completed project tasks as assigned

Contribution Professional Adequate Inadequate Professional Adequate Inadequate Abided by all provisions of the team contract/charter x Attended team meetings x Contributed ideas x Helped write project sections as assigned x Helped revise/edit projects sections as assigned x Helped in production of project (e.g. conducting research, selecting or designing visuals, etc.) x Section #2: Evaluate each team member’s contribution to the team Team member 1: Luke Do you feel that this team member contributed fairly, fully, and equally to this group? If so, why? If not, why not? Reference your minutes with specific dates to substantiate your claims. They truly helped create what our project was and poured in the most time out of all us into creating it. Please place an “X” in each row next to indicate your evaluation of your teammate’s work. Contribution Professional Adequate Inadequate Professional Adequate Inadequate Abided by all provisions of the team contract/charter x Attended team meetings x Contributed ideas x Helped write project sections as assigned x Helped revise/edit projects sections as assigned x Helped in production of project (e.g. conducting research, selecting or x

designing visuals, etc.) Team member 2: Thomas Do you feel that this team member contributed fairly, fully, and equally to this team? If so, why? If not, why not? Like Luke, they poured in a lot of time in order to create an amazing project. All of our workload was truly equal, and no one had any complaints. Please place an “X” in each row next to indicate your evaluation of your teammate’s work. Contribution Professional Adequate Inadequate Professional Adequate Inadequate Abided by all provisions of the team contract/charter x Attended team meetings x Contributed ideas x Helped write project sections as assigned x Helped revise/edit projects sections as assigned x Helped in production of project (e.g. conducting research, selecting or designing visuals, etc.) x Team member 3: This member left Do you feel that this team member contributed fairly, fully, and equally to this team? If so, why? If not, why not? Please place an “X” in each row next to indicate your evaluation of your teammate’s work. Contribution Professional Adequate Inadequate Professional Adequate Inadequate

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Abided by all provisions of the team contract/charter Attended team meetings Contributed ideas Helped write project sections as assigned Helped revise/edit projects sections as assigned Helped in production of project (e.g. conducting research, selecting or designing visuals, etc.) Team member 4: (if applicable) Do you feel that this team member contributed fairly, fully, and equally to this team? If so, why? If not, why not? Reference your minutes with specific dates to substantiate your claims. Please place an “X” in each row next to indicate your evaluation of your teammate’s work. Contribution Professional Adequate Inadequate Professional Adequate Inadequate Abided by all provisions of the team contract/charter Attended team meetings Contributed ideas Helped write project sections as assigned Helped revise/edit projects sections as assigned Helped in production of project (e.g. conducting research, selecting or designing visuals, etc.)

Related Documents

W7Q TQM DIS.docx

3_SITXHRM003_WA_V92020.pdf

Alexandre Filipe _S40066140_STAFF RECRUITMENT_ASSESSMENT 1-Q 3 ROLE PLAY.docx

Enhancing Employee Performance in Fast Food Deli Sandwich Franchises-1.docx

MGT---602(7).docx

ZX0320-F INDU1033ManagingAcrossCultures edited.docx

BSBLDR602_harpreet singh gill (3) new.docx

American Birkebeiner (1).edited.docx

BSBWHS605_Q1_WHS Audit Template_V1.0_OK_JC_APP.docx

1695832236687_Research Proposal 2 (2).doc

Task 3.docx

Preparing to support performance improvement.docx

Recommended textbooks for you

Management, Loose-Leaf Version

Management

ISBN:9781305969308

Author:Richard L. Daft

Publisher:South-Western College Pub

Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)

Management

ISBN:9781305502215

Author:Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic

Publisher:Cengage Learning

Principles of Management

Management

ISBN:9780998625768

Author:OpenStax

Publisher:OpenStax College

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

Recommended textbooks for you

Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)
Management
ISBN:9781305502215
Author:Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Management
Management
ISBN:9780998625768
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College