7050 Week 2 Discussion Board_Comments_5 Students
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Strathmore University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
Management
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by DukeMinkMaster907
Student 1
Hello,
Thanks for this post. Reading the post, I must say that I have a better understanding of the
waterfall and agile methodologies. Besides the information you have posted concerning each of
the methodologies, I would also like to add that Agile and waterfall are two distinctive
methodologies of processes to complete projects or work items. Agile is an iterative
methodology that incorporates a cyclic and collaborative process. Waterfall is a sequential
methodology that can also be collaborative, but tasks are generally handled in a more linear
process. Although the two methodologies are different, they are also similar in that they help in
producing software and, therefore, they help in achieving the final goal regardless of the stages
they take. Thanks.
Hello,
I enjoyed reading your post because of how informative it is. You have compared and contrasted
waterfall and agile methodologies very informatively. About agile methodology, I would like to
add that it is based on short-term deadlines which encourage productivity and efficiency. Another
advantage of agile methodology is that there is a lot of flexibility to change project direction and
experiment with new directions. Furthermore, agile methodology is client-facing, which means
that the team shares progress and incorporates feedback into the process. However, because team
members are working on multiple phases at a time, there is potential for overlap or unnecessary
effort spent on later stages if an early phase needs to be modified. Thanks.
Student 2
Hello,
The post is well written and makes lots of sense in relation to software development
methodologies. Following the agile methodology, your project will move through a series of
cycles throughout the lifetime of the project. The development phase, review, feedback, and then
approval of the work item – either yes or no. If yes, implement and complete the task. If no,
record and make any necessary changes, track and adjust the backlog or prioritization to reflect
the newly acquired knowledge, and then move onto the next task or sprint. Following the
waterfall methodology is a simpler process of moving tasks through the phases of defining
requirements, designing the implementation, implementing the work item, verification of
implementation and quality assurance, and then maintenance of the feature in the end. Thanks.
Hello,
The way you have written the post makes it easy to have better and more understanding of
software development methodologies especially agile methodology and waterfall methodology.
Although agile methodology is advantageous, there are also some shortcomings. Deliverables in
agile methodology are not a requirement to progress to the following phase. It can be harder to
ensure the entire team is on the same page – especially if it is a large team with different
departments. It also means that work can get lost or miscommunicated between team members,
especially when people leave and join the team in the middle of the projects. Although this is a
shortcoming on the side of agile, it is still one of the most preferred software development
methodologies. Thanks.
Student 3
Hello,
This is a very informative post in relation to the two popular software development
methodologies – agile and waterfall methodologies. Agile and Waterfall are two well-known
project management methodologies. Both of them are popular in software development but each
is best suited for different types of projects. The main difference is that Waterfall is a linear
system of working that requires the team to complete each project phase before moving on to the
next one while Agile encourages the team to work simultaneously on different phases of the
project. Selecting the right methodology for your projects will depend on preference and the
nature of each project. Some projects require a more iterative process and others require a more
sequential approach.
Hello,
I agree with you on what you have written about agile methodology and waterfall methodology.
However, there is more important information about these two software development
methodologies. Although agile methodology is seen as more advantageous than waterfall
methodology, it provides a concrete plan of the project from start to finish. Additionally, with
waterfall methodology, the team establishes project requirements early on, which can save time.
Each phase of the project in the waterfall methodology requires a deliverable to progress to the
next phase, making the workflow more structured. However, with waterfall methodology, you
might not realize an issue with a phase until you have already progressed to the next one. This
would mean going back through each phase and checking where the mistake or error occurred,
which can be a timely process.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Student 4
Hello,
The post is concisely written in relation to software development methodologies. After reading
the post, I comprehensively understand both methodologies. Agile methodology was developed
as a response to Waterfall’s more rigid structure. As a result, it is a much more fluid form of
project management. A software development project can take years to complete, and technology
can change significantly during that time. Agile was developed as a flexible method that
welcomes incorporating changes of direction even late in the process, as well as accounting for
stakeholders’ feedback throughout the process. In Agile, the team will work on phases of the
project concurrently, often with short-term deadlines. Additionally, the team, rather than a project
manager, drives the project’s direction. Thanks.
Hello,
The post makes lots of sense because it concisely compares waterfall methodology and agile
methodology. Waterfall is not as flexible as agile because each phase needs to be fully completed
before moving on to the next phase. The project is also planned out ahead of time, making this
management system ideal for teams with a clear vision of where they are headed from start to
finish. Flexibility is built into the agile method. Agile values short bursts of work, which are
called sprints. The method welcomes adapting to different directions, incorporating new
information even at a later stage of the project. Agile and waterfall are two different management
methodologies best suited for different types of projects. Thanks.
Student 5
Hello,
The post makes impressive statements about the comparison between waterfall methodology and
agile methodology. I would like to add that waterfall has a fixed timeline. The idea is that the
start and finish of the project are already mapped out from the beginning. Agile is a lot more
flexible and accounts for experimenting with different directions. Rather than a fixed timeline,
the schedule adapts as the project progresses. The Agile Manifesto, an online document released
in 2001 by a group of software developers, says team members are expected to, “deliver working
software frequently, from a couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a preference to the
shorter timescale.” Thanks.
Hello,
Thanks for a detailed comparison between waterfall and agile methodologies. In relation to client
involvement, with waterfall methodology, once the end goal is established, Waterfall does not
involve the client or project owner during the process, apart from specific check-ins or for
deliverables. The course of the project is outlined from the start, so incorporating client feedback
is not an ongoing part of the process. A fundamental part of Agile is including clients in the
project development at every step. The Agile Manifesto states, “Our highest priority is to satisfy
the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software.” Therefore, business
owners are expected to be involved and give feedback to the software development team as they
progress through the different phases of the project. Thanks.
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305969308/9781305969308_smallCoverImage.gif)
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337406659/9781337406659_smallCoverImage.gif)
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Recommended textbooks for you
- Management, Loose-Leaf VersionManagementISBN:9781305969308Author:Richard L. DaftPublisher:South-Western College PubPractical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305969308/9781305969308_smallCoverImage.gif)
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337406659/9781337406659_smallCoverImage.gif)
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,