Task 3 Case Study Analysis completed

docx

School

University of Nairobi *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

563

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by Sunday56

1 Assessment 3: Case Study part 2 Name Institution Affiliate Course Date

2 Introduction Leaders play a pivotal role as change agents in today's ever-changing healthcare landscape. This assessment focuses on critical aspects of organizational transformation, especially in the complex world of healthcare. It highlights the diverse responsibilities of leaders who navigate their organizations through uncertainty and complexity, striving to adapt, evolve, and flourish. The paper will emphasize the importance of organizational structures, power dynamics, resistance to change, and effective communication in managing change. These fundamental elements are central to our analysis. Their intricate relationships and the strategies used in managing them serve as the foundation for understanding the transformation journey of Tufts/New England Medical Center (Tufts/NEMC), as presented in the case study. This assessment provides an opportunity to examine how Tufts/NEMC handled significant changes. We will explore how these changes impacted various organizational departments and stakeholders. Additionally, we will examine communication strategies employed during this change management process. Evaluation of Organizational Use of Structures and Systems When evaluating how Tufts/NEMC handled its organizational structures and systems, it's essential to start by understanding the organization's challenges. In the early 2000s, when Ellen Zane took over as the hospital CEO, Tufts/NEMC was grappling with a complex set of problems that endangered its stability and long-term prospects. First and foremost, the organization was in a bad financial situation, having accumulated significant losses, which jeopardized its financial health (Ingols & Brem, 2016). This financial instability was worsened by operational inefficiencies that affected various aspects of the

3 organization's daily operations, including processes and resource management (Ingols & Brem, 2016). These operational challenges were closely intertwined with the financial crisis, worsening the overall situation. Furthermore, Tufts/NEMC operated in a highly competitive healthcare landscape in Boston, facing fierce competition from larger and more established healthcare institutions (Ingols & Brem, 2016). The organization's smaller size made it particularly vulnerable to the market dynamics. Tufts/NEMC implemented a series of changes in its structures and systems to tackle these challenges. One notable change was the restructuring of the senior management team, aimed at aligning leadership with the organization's transformation goals (Ingols & Brem, 2016). This restructuring retained valuable expertise while making significant alterations to critical positions. Additionally, the organization initiated a diagnostic process to comprehensively understand the root causes of its financial troubles, focusing on issues like accounts receivable, accounts payable, and underpaid managed care contracts (Ingols & Brem, 2016). This data- driven approach informed subsequent decision-making. The outcome of the efforts made can be observed in the results achieved during Ellen Zane's tenure. The organization's financial situation significantly improved, transitioning from a bad situation with only ten months of cash to a more stable position, allowing for future strategic planning (Ingols & Brem, 2016). Moreover, operational efficiencies were enhanced as the organization focused on improving key performance indicators, such as accounts receivable, accounts payable, and supply chain management (Ingols & Brem, 2016).

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 Types of Power in the Organization Power study is critical in any organization since it determines the intricate dynamics that shape decision-making, leadership, and, ultimately, the success or failure of the organization's objectives (Smith, 2014). This exploration also entails comprehending how power and influence factor into the organizational framework and the potential consequences of these power dynamics on the organization's endeavors for change. Within Tufts-NEMC, a multitude of power sources exercise their influence, impacting the organization's functioning. These power sources can be classified as follows: Legitimate Power: This type of power emanates from an individual's official role or position within the organization (Hooper & Potter, 2017). Ellen Zane, the CEO, wields significant legitimate power, granting her the authority to make pivotal decisions and chart the course for the organization. Expert Power: Expert power is rooted in an individual's knowledge and proficiency in a specific domain (Savolainen, 2021). Within Tufts-NEMC, individuals possessing expertise in medical fields, researchers, and specialists hold sway, particularly in medical practices and research matters. Referent Power: Referent power hinges on an individual's charisma and likability (Tipurić, 2022). In this context, Ellen Zane's ability to inspire and lead the organization, as evidenced by her successful stint at Quincy Hospital, has accorded her substantial referent power. The role of power and influence within the organization is pivotal to the decision-making process, the implementation of strategies, and the attainment of organizational objectives (Obioma Ejimabo, 2015). Ellen Zane's leadership style and her exercise of power are central to

5 the organization's capability to navigate the intricacies of the competitive healthcare industry. Her early morning work routine exemplifies her approach to wielding power, her hands-on management approach, and her emphasis on taking calculated risks. Moreover, her emphasis on fostering unity within the organization underscores the significance of using power to cultivate a shared vision and commitment among employees. The dynamics of power can profoundly impact the success of the organization's initiatives for change. Power struggles, resistance to change, and the ability to influence key stakeholders are crucial facets to consider. In this case, the potential consequences of power dynamics on Tufts-NEMC's endeavors for change can be encapsulated as follows: Resistance to Change: As previously noted, sustaining change within the healthcare industry, especially in Boston, poses formidable challenges. Power dynamics can give rise to resistance among employees and stakeholders who may harbor reservations about embracing novel approaches, potentially impeding efforts for change. Influence on Decision-Making: The organization's power distribution can leave an imprint on decision-making. Those wielding greater power may exert more influence over the course of change initiatives. Ellen Zane's leadership, shaped by her experiences at Quincy Hospital, may be pivotal in steering the trajectory of the change process. Collaborative Power: Recognizing the significance of collaborative power, where diverse stakeholders collaborate toward a shared objective, is imperative for the triumph of change initiatives. The ability to forge alliances and coalitions can serve as a potent force propelling change within the organization.

6 Impact on Departments and Stakeholders The impact of proposed organizational changes can have far-reaching consequences, affecting various departments and stakeholders. In the case of Tufts/New England Medical Center (Tufts/NEMC), the transformation initiatives undertaken during Ellen Zane's leadership substantially impacted different facets of the organization. One of the prominent areas of impact was the financial department. Given the organization's dire financial situation, the changes implemented to improve financial stability directly affected this department. As mentioned earlier, Tufts/NEMC faced financial instability, which was acutely felt by the finance team responsible for managing and mitigating the financial challenges (Ingols & Brem, 2016). The restructuring of financial processes, such as accounts receivable and accounts payable, affected the day-to-day operations of the finance department. The clinical departments also witnessed significant changes. The organization's emphasis on improving medical care quality and clinical practices necessitated adjustments in how clinical departments operated. Physicians and healthcare professionals were critical stakeholders in this process. Their roles and responsibilities evolved as they adapted to new standards and practices, influenced by the transformation agenda (Ingols & Brem, 2016). The impact on these departments was crucial, as they formed the core of the healthcare delivery system. Additionally, the changes had a ripple effect on various stakeholders. Patients at the heart of healthcare organizations experienced differences in the quality and efficiency of care. The alterations in medical practices, influenced by the transformation, directly impacted the patient experience. Moreover, the community at large, which had a stake in Tufts/NEMC's mission due to its history of community-focused philanthropy, observed changes in how the organization

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

7 addressed the healthcare needs of the underserved population (Ingols & Brem, 2016). This was a reflection of the institution's commitment to its community-oriented approach. To illustrate, the financial department's workload increased as it was tasked with implementing the changes necessary to address financial instability. Clinical departments adapted to new clinical practices and protocols, while physicians and healthcare professionals had to embrace these changes. Patients experienced improved care quality but faced adjustments in their interactions with the healthcare system. The broader community saw a continued commitment to serving their needs, albeit through altered approaches. Actions to Prevent or Mitigate Conflicts and Resistance Navigating organizational change inevitably involves addressing conflicts and resistance that may arise during the transition. Tufts/New England Medical Center (Tufts/NEMC) faced these challenges during its transformation process, and various actions were taken to prevent or mitigate conflicts and resistance. One essential action was effective communication. Clear and transparent communication is the cornerstone of change management (Ingols & Brem, 2016). Tufts/NEMC, under the leadership of Ellen Zane, recognized the importance of keeping all stakeholders well-informed about the changes and the rationale behind them. This transparency helped to reduce uncertainty and potential resistance, as stakeholders understood the need for change and felt included in the decision-making process. This action was particularly effective because it aligned with best practices in change communication (Ingols & Brem, 2016). Additionally, the organization focused on stakeholder engagement. Involving key stakeholders, such as physicians and healthcare professionals, in the planning and decision- making was crucial to mitigate potential resistance (Ingols & Brem, 2016). By actively seeking

8 their input and involving them in the change initiatives, the organization fostered a sense of ownership and commitment to the transformation. This approach practically aligned the organization's key players with the change agenda. Moreover, Tufts/NEMC implemented a comprehensive training program to equip employees with the skills and knowledge needed to adapt to the changes (Ingols & Brem, 2016). This action aimed to address the practical aspects of change by ensuring that employees had the resources and support necessary to navigate the new organizational landscape. Training is a well- established method for mitigating resistance and improving the acceptance of change (Ingols & Brem, 2016). In terms of effectiveness, communication and stakeholder engagement were highly successful actions. They created a sense of transparency, involvement, and alignment with the transformation agenda. The evidence from the case study suggests that these actions contributed significantly to the successful implementation of change at Tufts/NEMC. The training program also played a crucial role in equipping employees with the skills required for the new environment. However, its effectiveness may vary depending on the organization's specific needs and circumstances. Assessment of Communication's Effects on Change Implementation The effects of communication on implementing proposed changes were significant within Tufts-NEMC. Effective communication was pivotal in rallying support, addressing concerns, and fostering understanding among stakeholders. It allowed for a clear and compelling vision of change, aligning all parties with the transformation objectives (Ingols & Brem, 2016). In the case study, Ellen Zane's emphasis on open and transparent communication positively influenced change implementation. It allowed stakeholders to actively engage in

9 discussions about proposed changes, resulting in a sense of involvement and ownership. This approach reduced potential resistance and facilitated smoother transitions (Ingols & Brem, 2016). Best practices in communication during change management involve several key principles. First, clear and compelling communication is essential to ensure that all stakeholders understand the change objectives and benefits. Regular, consistent updates should be provided to keep everyone informed of progress and any necessary adjustments. Communication should be tailored to the audience, considering different stakeholders' specific needs and concerns. Additionally, two-way communication, encouraging feedback and addressing questions and concerns, is crucial to successful change management (Ingols & Brem, 2016). Ellen Zane's communication strategy was effective and aligned with these best practices. She provided a clear vision of change, emphasized frequent updates, tailored communication to different audiences, and encouraged feedback. Her approach allowed the organization to engage with stakeholders, address their concerns, and maintain transparency (Ingols & Brem, 2016). One remarkable aspect of Zane's strategy was her town meetings, which she conducted at various times, including during night shifts. This ensured that all employees, from housekeeping staff to physicians, had the opportunity to engage with her directly. The town meetings facilitated information dissemination, and Zane's hands-on approach created a sense of belonging and accessibility to the CEO. This contributed to positive employee morale and a shared sense of purpose (Case Study).

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

10 Conclusion In conclusion, this analysis underscores the vital role of leadership in change management, the intricate interplay of key elements in organizational transformation, and the profound impact these factors can have on an organization's strategy and implementation. The case of Tufts/NEMC serves as a valuable source of insights and lessons applicable to the broader realm of healthcare management. As healthcare continues to evolve, understanding and mastering these factors will remain essential for organizations striving to thrive in the ever- shifting healthcare landscape.

11 Reference Hooper, A., & Potter, J. (2017). Leadership Perspectives . Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315250601-21/power-failure- management-circuits-rosabeth-moss-kanter Ingols, C., & Brem, L. (2018). Case Study 5: Ellen Zane—Leading Change at Tufts/NEMC.Simmons College School of Management, Boston. Obioma Ejimabo, N. (2015). The Influence of Decision Making in Organizational Leadership and Management Activities. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Organization Management , 04 (02). https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-026x.1000138 Savolainen, R. (2021, June 15). Expert power as a constituent of opinion leadership: a conceptual analysis . Informationr.net. https://informationr.net/ir/26-2/paper898.html Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal , 57 (6), 1592–1623. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0932 Tipurić, D. (2022). Strategic Leadership Between Hegemony and Ideology. The Enactment of Strategic Leadership , 147–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03799-3_6

Task 3 Case Study Analysis completed

Related Documents