Case 18.2 SUMMARY

docx

School

The University of Nairobi *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

306

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

1

Uploaded by reginamwikali97

Report
Case 18.2 1. In light of the Federal rules of civil procedure, do parties have an ethical duty to refrain from lengthy litigation in certain cases? Yes. Rule numbers 4 and 5 state that a lawyer should always be competent and should keep confidently keep information relating to client representation just unless disclosure is required and that also, a lawyer should conform to law requirements and also use the law procedures for legitimate purposes only. 2. Which CSR approach did the oppose, Brooks Brothers, adopt in this case? How did the approach backfire from a strategic perspective? They used the narrow view where the managers are entirely accountable to the shareholders to make as much legally profits as they can. This approach backfired when Amy acquired a pro bono representation by a large law firm. 3. Which CSR approach would you have chosen and why? I would chose the broad view to ensure that I promote the legal, ethical and economic responsibilities and also serve the public. 4. Use your favorite search engine to find any websites or documents related to the Brooks Brothers’ commitment to CSR. How does it comport with their actions in this case? Should it be amended? Explain. The Brooks Brothers in their commitment to CSR have started initiatives like inclusion, equity, diversity, sustainability and ethical sourcing among others. Their stakeholders are the people to say hold them accountable or set their standards for CSR.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help