Chapter 13 - Essay_ Examining the Micromanager

docx

School

CUNY Queens College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

101

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by KidHeron3168

Report
Kevin Rosas Chapter 13 - Essay: Examining the Micromanager Micromanagers are managers who tend to overly supervise and control their staff, which frequently leads to low morale, resentment, and poor productivity. Employees generally avoid working with bosses that exhibit micromanagement tendencies since the term "micromanager" carries a negative connotation. Micromanagers are perfectionists who are overly interested in every area of their employees' job and have a strong need for control. Micromanagers' actions can be explained by a number of things, including a lack of faith in their staff members' ability, a need for total control, or a fear of failure. Some micromanagers believe that their constant engagement is necessary for success and that their staff members cannot fulfill their duties without their constant monitoring. Other micromanagers could think that their reputation or status are in danger if they don't closely supervise every part of their subordinates' job. Managers that micromanage their workforce are ultimately bound to failure for a variety of reasons. First of all, micromanagement encourages a dependency on the boss culture and prevents employees from refining their skills and gaining confidence. (van de Ridder, J. M. M., DeSanctis, J. T., Mookerjee, A. L., & Rajput, V, 2020) Employees are less inclined to take risks, be creative, or learn from their failures when they perceive that their management does not trust them to make judgments. A lack of autonomy and empowerment brought on by micromanagement is another factor that contributes to low job satisfaction and high turnover rates. Second, micromanagement requires a lot of work and may cause manager burnout. A manager can't properly assign tasks and responsibilities when they are too interested in every aspect of their staff members' work. (Collins, S. K., & Collins, K. S, 2002). This could result in the manager having an excessive burden, which would ultimately lead to stress, weariness, and a drop in productivity. Lastly, micromanagement can deteriorate the rapport between managers and staff members. Employees may grow resentful and lose respect for their management if they believe that they are not being trusted by the latter. This may result in a breakdown in teamwork, collaboration, and communication, which could eventually lead to less efficiency and productivity. (van de Ridder, J. M. M., DeSanctis, J. T., Mookerjee, A. L., & Rajput, V, 2020) In summary, micromanagers act in this way because of a variety of reasons, including a lack of trust, a desire for control, or a fear of failing. However, managers that micromanage staff
members are doomed to failure in the long term because micromanagement fosters a culture of dependency, causes fatigue, and ruins the working relationship. Therefore, it is critical for managers to have trust in their staff, efficiently assign duties and responsibilities, and provide their staff the freedom to decide for themselves and accept responsibility for their work. Managers can do this by fostering a culture of independence, creativity, and collaboration that boosts output and increases job satisfaction. Citations: van de Ridder, J. M. M., DeSanctis, J. T., Mookerjee, A. L., & Rajput, V. (2020). Micromanagement Creates a Nonconducive Learning Environment for a Teaching Team. Journal of graduate medical education , 12 (5), 639–640. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20- 00926.1 Collins, S. K., & Collins, K. S. (2002). Micromanagement--a costly management style. Radiology management , 24 (6), 32–35.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help