W3 SAFMEDS
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
National University College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
634
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
7
Uploaded by BailiffRoseCat63
Data Analysis and Study Approach for SAFMEDS Deck 2
Ayanna King
National University
ABA 634 Supervision and Management
Professor Mitchell Medley
October 15, 2023
Data Analysis and Study Approach for SAFMEDS Deck 2
Figure 1.1
Standard Celeration Chart for Acquisition Deck 2 Week 3
Figure 1.2 Raw Data for Acquisition Deck 2 Week 3
Figure 2.1
Standard Celeration Chart for Neutral Deck Week 3
Figure 2.2 Raw Data for Neutral Deck Week 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Data Analysis Above is data collected from week 3 of ABA 634, which consists of the acquisition deck 2 and the neutral deck. In Figures 1.1 and 1.2 acquisition deck categories, consist of a graph and raw data collection of 5 data study dates collected showing the highest score from each of the 5 days that trials were done. Then in Figures 2.1 and 2.2 is the neutral deck, a collection of all the previous definition decks from all my previous classes. There are also 5 data points on the graph,
from each of the 5 days trials were done. The data starts on October 9, 2023, and then ends on October 15, 2023. Figure 1.2 shows the acquisition graph using Deck 2 starting on October 9, 2023. The deck baseline points are 2 accel and 6decel with the first week of studying the deck. For acquisition accel, the final study date I received 6 accel. This makes the accel acquisition line upward trend line and at the low-level ending for the week. The variability is low because the graph didn’t have any out-of-range outliers. For acquisition decel data had a baseline point of 6 for the week then ended the week with the final decel of 1. This would make acquisition decel
data line with a no trend line with low variability. The decel data points are close in number, there is just not a consistent pattern they just stayed at the average of 2 and 3, decel 1 is on the goal line for decel. Figure 2.1 and Figure 2.2 shows the data for the neutral deck, which consists of all the deck’s definition cards since ABA 620. With the 5 data points I collected on the graph, the data is consistent with the previous data on the graph. I have maintained low variability, no active trend line, and at a moderate level for data. For fluency accel, I stay with an average of 10 and 11
making the line still close to straight since no real pattern line of increasing or decreasing. There is also no variability in the data on the accel data collected. The decel data is like the accel, the decel stayed between the average of 3-2 decel making the trend line close to flat, with no variability with the scores. This graph has always been similar because I have always worked on acquisition data as a priority. I have never in of the classes been able to achieve the decel of 0 for
any of the graphs since I focus on the accel score. Study Approach
Antecedent
For SAFMEDS, my goal is to study for a minimum of an hour, and then split my study focus up by days when possible. I have 2 days of studying the decks separately the fluency decks
the acquisition deck, so it will decrease my study time and help with one primary focus area. On weekends, I try to extend my studies if possible and then do most of my studying in the AM. When doing the trials, I also try to be in a new location for studying. Each trial is 30 seconds, then I write each score down, where I study, the amount of time studying, and any factors
affecting it, and then highlight the final score to input later. The first baseline data point is without studying to show the scores before applying study skills. Behavior
For both the acquisition and mastery deck, I study for at least 30 to 45 minutes then, use a
computer timer of 30 seconds to run the trials. All data is collected in the notebook for the week and the class. I could keep most of the study time before 9:30 p.m. and then finish my study time
on weekends before 12 p.m. I had a solo deck study and trials of the acquisition deck on 10/10/23 and 10/12/23. Then on 10/09/23 and 10/11/23 I studied and did trials just on the acquisition decks. Since both of those dates were week dates, I studied for 45 minutes and then completed the trials. This week I used the digital cards I was able to find online to be able to run through the cards during random free time throughout the week. I did find it a little bit easier to just study with little mini sessions to just read through cards. Consequences
My highest acquisition scores were on the weekend. This is normal because I study earlier, no work, and I have a longer studying time. I was also able to have 2 days of just studying the fluency deck and then 2 days just studying the acquisition deck which helped with to not overwhelm myself with too much information in one. By the weekend time, I was able to at least have an acquisition accel of 6 which I think leaves me at a good starting point with the first week. This will give me more cushion when I am studying next week because I am already close to the halfway point. Adjustments
For the adjustment, I think I will give myself an acquisition accel score of 9 by the end of
the next week. I will also continue to incorporate the study of digital flashcards in different parts
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
of my day. I think that will help me with being more familiar with the vocabulary especially with
the midterm coming up. I think on the weekend I will hold off to take the midterm so I can have as many study dates as possible. For the midterm, my goal is to at least a 70% so I think I will also take time the review the lectures to help with the score.