ds
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Maseno University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1406
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
12
Uploaded by karugu
CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY
This research has several objectives and questions that offer detailed direction to achieve
the intended research aims.
Research Aims
The research explores the successes and challenges in implementing inclusive practices
in secondary and high schools in Bangladesh and the UK by reporting on critical components
within an inclusive school for success and the barriers to inclusion within the school.
Research Questions
The research questions for the research entail:
i.
What are the essential elements that contribute to successful inclusive practice, and how
do these overlapping themes from the literature apply to creating successful inclusive
schools, encompassing aspects like strong leadership and inclusion training for staff?
ii.
What are the challenges in implementing inclusive education practices in secondary and
high schools in the UK?
iii.
What are the challenges in implementing inclusive education policies in secondary and
high schools in Bangladesh?
I hypothesize that inclusive education practice implementation has been more successful,
with children with disabilities, in the UK than in Bangladesh, with Bangladesh experiencing a lot
more challenges than the UK. However, the two countries can improve the situation through
increased focus on the failures and building on the notable successes.
Research Objectives
The following study objectives can be developed based on the research aim and questions:
i.
To identify the essential elements that contribute to the success of inclusive schools
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
ii.
Identify and assess the difficulties encountered in implementing inclusive education
practices in high schools in the United Kingdom.
iii.
Identify and analyze the problems encountered in implementing inclusive education
practice in Bangladesh secondary and high schools.
It is crucial to note that this study’s objectives are consistent with its aims and questions
and seek to give a thorough knowledge of implementing inclusive education practice in both the
United Kingdom and Bangladesh. Furthermore, the study tries to reveal the barriers and
obstacles that impede the realization of inclusive education goals by identifying and analyzing
the issues experienced in practice implementation in both situations.
Databases Searched
Since this study takes the form of desktop research, there should be a rigorous and
comprehensive topic analysis. Therefore, the research will search credible databases to gather
relevant peer-reviewed literature. The databases include and are not limited to digital libraries,
academic databases, and educational research repositories. The databases will consist of the
following;
JSTOR
British Education Index
Google Scholar
Wiley Online Library
These broad databases are chosen based on their credibility and relevance to the study’s
topic. Before embarking on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, it is crucial to highlight some of
the keywords and phrases used to identify the articles before applying the standards. The
following are the research’s keywords and phrases.
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
Inclusive education
Inclusive education practice in the UK.
Inclusive education practice in Bangladesh
Implementing inclusive education practice
Education Equity in Bangladesh
Education equity in the UK.
Special educational needs,
Challenges in inclusive education
Education policies, high schools
Inclusion And Exclusion Criteria – How Articles Were Selected
When performing a desktop research study, it is critical to consider the inclusion and
exclusion criteria. These variables are guiding principles for identifying relevant and trustworthy
data that matches the study objectives and questions. As a result, these criteria help choose
relevant and valid sources while minimizing bias or inappropriate information. In most cases, the
inclusion criteria specify the characteristics or qualities that a source or study must have to be
selected for inclusion in the research. Conversely, exclusion criteria identify elements that would
cause resources or publications to be excluded from the study.
This study has several inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure validity and meet its
goals, objectives, and questions.
Inclusion Criteria
Articles should be from peer-reviewed databases and recognized government websites
(Websites with either edu., org. or gov. uk).
Articles published in the last 5-10 years.
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Articles published in English.
Studies/ research in articles should be located in the UK and Bangladesh.
Exclusion Criteria
Articles and books published in a language other than English.
Articles and books were published more than ten years ago.
Non-educational or authentic website.
Not peer-reviewed articles
Focused on other countries besides UK and Bangladesh
Advantages and limitations of using a desktop study approach
Advantages of using a desktop study approach:
Cost-effectiveness: Desktop research is more value-powerful than subject research
because it relies upon current facts and materials, decreasing the need for additional sources
(Akhter et al., 2021). The cost-effectiveness of a desktop study approach is particularly
advantageous for researchers with limited budgets or resources. By relying on existing data and
materials, researchers can save costs associated with data collection and fieldwork, making it a
more accessible option for various research projects.
Time-efficient: Conducting a literature overview is frequently faster than conducting new
studies because it involves studying conveniently to be had information. The time-efficient
nature of a desktop study allows researchers to quickly gather and analyze information, making it
an ideal choice for time-sensitive projects or when immediate insights are needed. This approach
can expedite the research process, enabling researchers to focus on data interpretation and
drawing conclusions.
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
Broad scope:
A desktop study allows researchers to cover various sources and data from
various locations and periods, enabling a comprehensive analysis (Akhter et al., 2021). The
broad scope provided by a desktop study is beneficial for researchers aiming to explore diverse
sources and data from various contexts. This wide-ranging approach can lead to a more
comprehensive understanding of the research topic and potentially uncover patterns or trends that
may have been overlooked in narrower studies.
Insights from previous work:
By examining prior research and studies, researchers can
build upon existing knowledge and gain insights from the collective findings of others (Akhter et
al., 2021). Drawing insights from previous work through a desktop study helps researchers build
upon existing knowledge and theories. By synthesizing findings from multiple sources,
researchers can identify gaps in the literature and formulate research questions that contribute
meaningfully to their field of study.
Ethical considerations: Since a desktop study uses pre-existing data, there are generally
fewer ethical concerns, as no direct involvement with human subjects is required. From an
ethical standpoint, a desktop study typically involves working with pre-existing data, minimizing
direct involvement with human subjects. This reduces potential risks and ethical concerns related
to informed consent, privacy, and data collection procedures, making it a preferable option for
certain research areas where these considerations are essential.
Limitations of using a desktop study approach
Limited management over information exceptional:
Researchers have less control
over the satisfaction and accuracy of the facts used in a literature review because it relies on
sources created by others (Braun et al., 2021). One of the main limitations of a desktop study
approach is the limited control over data quality and accuracy. Researchers rely on information
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
gathered and analyzed by others, potentially leading to variations in the reliability and relevance
of the data used for the literature review.
Potential bias: Existing statistics can be encouraged by employing the biases and
obstacles of the original researchers, potentially affecting the reliability of the conclusions drawn
within the computing device observed (Akhter et al., 2021). The use of existing data introduces
the risk of potential bias and limitations inherent in the original research. If the original studies
were influenced by certain biases or constraints, these could carry over into the findings of the
desktop study, impacting the credibility of the conclusions drawn.
Lack of context:
Without carrying out number one research, vital contextual statistics
may be ignored, making it hard to completely recognize the complexities of a specific subject
matter (Braun et al., 2021). A desktop study may lack the depth of context that primary research
provides. Without direct data collection, researchers may miss crucial contextual information,
hindering a comprehensive understanding of the complexities surrounding a specific subject.
Data availability: Depending on the concern, some information may be previous,
incomplete, or unavailable, restricting the scope of the take-a-look. Data availability can be a
significant obstacle in a desktop study. Some relevant data might be outdated, incomplete, or
simply unavailable, constraining the scope of the research and limiting the depth of analysis.
Inability to reply to specific questions: A computer that has a look at it won't be able to
cope with certain research questions or offer in-intensity insights which could handiest be
acquired thru direct statistics series (Braun et al., 2021). Certain research questions may be
challenging to address through a desktop study. In-depth insights that require direct data
collection and analysis might not be attainable, leaving some specific questions unanswered.
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Overreliance on present resources: Relying totally on existing information can cause
ignored opportunities for exploring new avenues of research or gaining clean views (Akhter et
al., 2021). Overreliance on existing sources can limit the exploration of new research avenues or
fresh perspectives. Researchers may miss out on opportunities to develop novel insights by
exclusively relying on previously published materials, potentially constraining the originality of
the study.
To conquer a number of these limitations, researchers frequently complement desktop
studies with number one study methods, including surveys, interviews, or experiments, to offer a
more comprehensive understanding of the subject rely upon.
Data Analysis
Here's an outline of how the thematic analysis will be conducted:
To begin with Data Familiarization: The first step involves familiarizing oneself with the
information, which, in this example, includes analyzing information on the content of the
selected articles (Willumsen et al., 2019). Data familiarization is a vital initial step in the
thematic evaluation process, wherein the researcher immerses themselves within the decided-on
articles' content. By cautiously reading the facts contained inside these articles, the researcher
gains a comprehensive understanding of the subject remember and the potential subject matters
that may emerge. This process entails thoroughly analyzing and reviewing the statistics, listening
to key ideas, thoughts, and statements.
Generating Initial Codes: As the researcher reads through the articles, they will identify
and label relevant data segments with initial codes (Jahja et al., 2021). These codes will help in
capturing specific ideas, concepts, or statements related to inclusive education practices,
successes, and challenges in both the UK and Bangladesh. During the process of generating
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
initial codes, the researcher carefully reads through the selected articles, actively identifying and
labeling relevant data segments. These preliminary codes function as tags or markers, permitting
the researcher to seize particular thoughts, ideas, or statements touching on inclusive schooling
practices, successes, and demanding situations inside the context of both the UK and Bangladesh
(Hunt, 2021). By systematically coding the data, the researcher organizes and categorizes the
data, making it less difficult to extract significant insights and styles.
Searching for Themes: The researcher will begin searching for patterns or themes among
these codes after generating initial codes. Themes are recurring concepts or ideas that cut across
different segments of the data. The researcher will compare codes and look for commonalities to
form potential themes.
Reviewing Themes: At this stage, the researcher will review and refine the identified
themes, ensuring that they accurately represent the data and are relevant to the research questions
(Willumsen et al., 2019). The themes should be meaningful and contribute to understanding the
successes and challenges of inclusive education practices in both countries.
Defining and Naming Themes: Once the themes have been finalized, the researcher will
define and name each theme to capture its essence concisely. Clear definitions of themes help
maintain consistency during the analysis. Well-defined themes ensure coherence and consistency
throughout the analysis, enabling easy reference and interpretation of the findings (Aguinis &
Solarino, 2019). By articulating the themes in a succinct manner, the researcher enhances the
clarity of the thematic analysis, facilitating effective communication and presentation of the
research results. These defined and named themes become the backbone of the analysis,
providing a cohesive structure to the research insights.
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
Grouping Data: The researcher will then organize the relevant data within each theme to
provide evidence and support for the identified themes. This step ensures that the analysis is
grounded in the data and allows for a deeper understanding of each theme's implications (Mihas,
2019). By grounding the analysis in the data, this step enhances the validity and reliability of the
research findings. Organizing the data within each theme allows for a comprehensive exploration
of the underlying patterns and implications, facilitating a deeper understanding of the
complexities and insights derived from the thematic analysis.
Data Interpretation: In this phase, the researcher will interpret the data within each theme,
looking for relationships, connections, and possible explanations (Sinkovics, 2018). This
interpretation will involve critical thinking and drawing on relevant literature to contextualize the
findings. Critical thinking and referencing relevant literature contextualize the findings,
providing a deeper understanding of the research insights.
Validating Findings: To ensure the credibility of the analysis, the researcher may use
techniques like member checking or seeking input from colleagues or experts in the field
(Sinkovics, 2018). Seeking input from colleagues or experts in the field provides an external
perspective, strengthening the trustworthiness of the findings. Through validation, potential
biases or inaccuracies can be addressed, enhancing the overall robustness and reliability of the
research outcomes.
Reporting the Results: Finally, the researcher will present the findings coherently and
organized, using appropriate quotes and examples from the selected articles to support each
theme. The thematic analysis report should address the research questions and objectives,
offering insights into the successes and challenges of inclusive education practices in the UK and
Bangladesh.
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Throughout the process, the researcher will remain attentive to any counter-evidence or
contradictory data to avoid biases and ensure a rigorous and comprehensive analysis of the
selected articles. The research-specific literature and previous studies on inclusive education
practices will be referenced to support the interpretations and provide a broader context for the
findings.
Dissemination
The findings of this study will be disseminated through several approaches. First, the
results of the research will be presented in a graduate conference organized by the University of
South Wales where educators, examiners and fellow learners in the MA classes, among other
parties will be available. Additional dissemination will be carried out through publishing the
paper findings in peer reviewed journals, as a fulfillment of the MA University graduation
requirements. To enhance the studies’ visibility and accessibility, the paper's findings might be
submitted for eBook in reliable peer-reviewed journals. This avenue aligns with the MA
University commencement requirements and guarantees rigorous scrutiny by way of problem
remember specialists and researchers within the subject. Through booklet in instructional
journals, the studies gain reputation and contributes to the body of knowledge, accomplishing a
broader worldwide target audience of students, policymakers, and practitioners.
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
References
Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research:
The case of interviews with elite informants.
Strategic Management Journal
,
40
(8),
1291-1315. Available at:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/smj.3015
Akhter, S., Javed, M. K., Shah, S. Q., & Javaid, A. (2021). Highlighting the advantages and
disadvantages of E-learning. Psychol. Educ, 58(5), 1607-14. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anam-
Javaid/publication/352329894_Highlighting_the_Advantages_and_Disadvantages_of_E-
Learning/links/60c3bbcb299bf1949f4e609c/Highlighting-the-Advantages-and-
Disadvantages-of-E-Learning.pdf
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a
qualitative research tool.
International journal of social research methodology
,
24
(6),
641-654. Available at:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
Council for Disabled Children (2023)
Participation
,
Council for Disabled Children
. Available at:
https://councilfordisabledchildren.org.uk/what-we-do-0/areas-work/participation
.
Hunt, P. F. (2021). Inclusive education: The case for early identification and early intervention in
assistive technology.
Assistive Technology
,
33
(sup1), S94-S101. Available at:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10400435.2021.1974122
Jahja, A. S., Ramalu, S. S., & Razimi, M. S. A. (2021). Generic qualitative research in
management studies.
JRAK (Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis)
,
7
(1), 1-13. Available at:
http://jurnal.plb.ac.id/index.php/JRAK/article/view/523
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
Mihas, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis. In
Oxford research encyclopedia of education
.
Available at:
https://oxfordre.com/education/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acref
ore-9780190264093-e-1195
O’Neill, G., & Padden, L. (2022). Diversifying assessment methods: Barriers, benefits and
enablers.
Innovations in education and teaching international
,
59
(4), 398-409. Available
at:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14703297.2021.1880462
Sinkovics, N. (2018). Pattern matching in qualitative analysis. The sage handbook of qualitative
business and management research methods, 468-485. Available at:
https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5018775&publisher=FZ7200#page=489
Willumsen, P., Oehmen, J., Stingl, V., & Geraldi, J. (2019). Value creation through project risk
management.
International Journal of Project Management
,
37
(5), 731-749. Available at:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786318304848
PU
BLI
C /
CY
HO
ED
DU
S
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help