Ken__Fulkroad_HIS_200__Applied_History_Module_Seven_Short_Responses
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
200
Subject
History
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
6
Uploaded by AdmiralInternetFox28
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 1 Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Be sure to respond to this question in no more than one sentence, using proper grammar.
Analyze the Native-settler relationship through the lenses of power dynamics, cultural exchange, and colonialism's impact on indigenous societies.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 2 Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be
longer than one sentence.
A multifaceted appraisal of the conflicts between Natives and white settlers in the early 19th century uncovers a range of interwoven factors that transcend simple land disputes.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 3 Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw.
One historical lens to consider is colonialism and Indigenous relations. This lens focuses on
the interactions between the European settlers and the indigenous peoples of North America, particularly the Wampanoag people. It delves into the complex dynamics of power, diplomacy, alliance, and ultimately conflict that shaped the early relationships between the settlers and the native inhabitants. A second historical lens that could be used to understand these events is disease and demographic impact. This lens examines the profound impact of diseases, such as smallpox, brought by European explorers and settlers on the native populations. It considers the demographic upheaval and devastation caused by these diseases and how they shaped the social, political, and military landscapes of the time. Finally, the lens of myth-making and historical narratives is a useful approach to gaining a better understanding of these events. This lens explores the construction of historical narratives, including the myth of the first Thanksgiving, and the role of such narratives in shaping cultural identity, national memory, and political agendas. It looks at how historical events are interpreted, remembered, and sometimes mythologized to serve particular purposes. These lenses provide distinct perspectives for analyzing the complex historical events described in the transcript. Each lens offers a unique framework for understanding the broader context, implications, and legacies of the interactions between the Pilgrims, the Wampanoag, and the broader historical forces involved in early colonial America.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 4 Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.)
Massasoit's willingness to ally with the Pilgrims was partly motivated by the devastation wrought by the epidemic that had significantly reduced the indigenous population in the
region, weakening their capacity to resist potential threats from newcomers.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 5 Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.
One short-term consequence of the alliance was the mutual defense against common enemies.
A treaty between the Pilgrims and Wampanoag, signed in 1621, committed both sides to a mutual defense alliance against their common enemies, providing immediate security for both
groups. One long-term consequence of the alliance was the fraying relations between the natives and the settlers as more Englishmen, both Puritans and non-religious, arrived in New England, tipping the balance of power in favor of the English. This shift in power dynamics and the influx of more English settlers led to growing tensions and ultimately contributed to the unraveling of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the settlers
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 6 How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about
your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it.
Through my research, I have gained a more nuanced understanding of the historical events surrounding the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims. One misconception I
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
discovered I held relates to the long-term consequences of the alliance. Initially, I believe I oversimplified the aftermath, assuming that the alliance would have had lasting positive effects. However, the research has revealed that the alliance ultimately unraveled due to the arrival of more English settlers and the resulting shift in power dynamics, leading to fraying relations between the natives and the settlers. This realization emphasizes the complex and often precarious nature of early colonial alliances and their susceptibility to broader historical
forces and power struggles. Therefore, my understanding has evolved to recognize the fragility and vulnerability of such alliances in the face of changing circumstances and interests.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 7 Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee
Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite.
The first historical lens to view the events of the Cherokee Removal is through a legal and political lens. This lens focuses on the legal and political processes surrounding the Cherokee
Removal, including the implications of the Supreme Court's decisions in cases such as Worcester v. Georgia (NationalTrailsNPS, 2009, 6:53). One aspect to consider is the tension between the federal government and the state of Georgia, and the broader questions of federal
authority, tribal sovereignty, and the enforcement of treaties. Another lens to analyze this historical event is the Human Rights and Ethics Lens. This lens examines the moral and ethical dimensions of the Cherokee Removal, shedding light on the profound human rights violations and injustices faced by the Cherokee people. One aspect to consider is the forced displacement and the devastating impact on the Cherokee community, highlighting the ethical
implications of government policies and actions. Next, there is the socioeconomic lens. This lens delves into the socioeconomic factors underlying the Cherokee Removal, including land speculation, economic interests, and the broader context of westward expansion. One aspect to consider is the economic motives of settlers, including the desire for access to valuable land and resources in the Southeast, which contributed to the push for the removal of indigenous nations. Finally, these events can be viewed through the cultural and identity lens.
This lens explores the cultural and identity dimensions of the Cherokee Removal, encompassing the preservation of Cherokee culture, language, and traditions in the face of displacement and assimilation pressures. One aspect to consider is the resilience of Cherokee cultural heritage and the enduring legacy of the Trail of Tears in shaping Cherokee identity and narratives of survival and endurance.
Reference: NationalTrailsNPS. (2009). Trail of Tears National Historic Trail [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LSkfmCj8Jg
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 8 Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: "The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it." Cite at least three historical facts that support your position.
Based on the historical facts, I agree with the thesis statement that "The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it." Three historical facts that support this position are; a lack of proper representation, violation of established treaties,
and resistance and tragic consequences. The first historical fact of the lack of proper representation can be seen by in the way the Treaty of New Echota was signed by a small faction of the Cherokee tribe, known as the Treaty Party, without the consent of the majority of the Cherokee people. This lack of proper representation undermines the legitimacy of the treaty and raises questions about its validity. The Cherokee National Council, which represented the majority of the Cherokee people, had previously rejected the terms of the treaty, highlighting the internal dissent and opposition to the agreement.
This second historical fact is shown through the Treaty of New Echota, in how it violated previous treaties, including the Treaty of Hopewell (1785) and the Treaty of Tellico (1798), which had established the boundaries and sovereignty of the Cherokee Nation. The terms of the Treaty of New Echota led to the forced removal of the Cherokee from their ancestral lands, contrary to the provisions of earlier treaties. This violation of established treaties undermines the legitimacy of the Treaty of New Echota and supports the argument that the National Party was correct to oppose it. The signing of the Treaty of New Echota and the subsequent forced removal of the Cherokee, known as the Trail of Tears, led to the third identified historical fact, that widespread resistance and tragic consequences for the Cherokee
people occurred. The opposition to the treaty by the National Party reflected the concerns of the Cherokee Nation and their rightful sovereignty over their territories. The devastating impact of the removal on the Cherokee, including thousands of deaths during the forced relocation, underscores the profound injustice and the validity of the opposition to the treaty.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help