Annotated Bibliography Battle of Bunker Hill
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Liberty University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
512
Subject
History
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
13
Uploaded by DukeDonkeyPerson866
Annotated Bibliography:
The Battle of Bunker Hill, 1775:
The Loss that Propelled the Colonists to Victory
Chad Davenport
HIUS 512: American Revolution
November 26, 2023
PROJECT OVERVIEW
The research paper gives a detailed look at the Battle of Bunker Hill and argues that what looked like an American defeat initially was a strategic advantage that ultimately helped them win the American Revolutionary War. It looks at what happened before the fight when tensions rose between the British troops and the American colonies. It examines the military choices, actions, and results, explaining how the US troops, despite a tactical setback, learned important lessons that would influence their future military operations
1
. The paper focuses on how the battle affected the spirit of the American and British forces, especially how strong the American men were and how it affected the minds of those on both sides. Additionally, the paper explores the insights the American military leadership gained and how those lessons informed subsequent strategies. In addition, it looks at how the Battle of Bunker Hill helped build international support and change diplomatic ties, showing that it had effects far beyond the battleground. Finally, the paper brings all these different parts together and says that the lessons learned, the ability to change, and the effects on other countries because of this apparent loss helped the Americans win their fight for freedom.
Preliminary Thesis Statement
An important turning point in the American Revolutionary War's early phases was the Battle of Bunker Hill. The combat, which took place on June 17, 1775, had significant strategic and psychological implications for both parties involved, ultimately influencing the trajectory of the war in subsequent years. The event showcased the Colonists' capacity to resist the formidable
British army, instilled confidence in the American forces, and had a significant psychological effect on both factions. Additionally, this event compelled the British to modify their strategic 1
Ellison, Amy. "Bunker Hill: A City, a Siege, a Revolution." Historian
, 2015: 138-139
approaches and gave the Colonists the necessary guidance to engage in a protracted and arduous conflict.
Bibliography
"A Full and Correct Account of the Battle of Bunker Hill." Boston, 1825.
The historical narrative titled "A Full and Correct Account of the Battle of Bunker Hill" provides an accurate, comprehensive, and primary source depiction of the events that transpired during the Battle of Bunker Hill. This significant engagement took place within the context of the American Revolution. The book, which came out in Boston in 1825, goes into great depth about the battle, including what happened before it, how the British and American armies fought,
and how they won. The author's name is not given, but the book is written straightforwardly and objectively. It uses many first-hand sources, like letters, journals, and other historical records, to provide an accurate and complete account of the battle. The author talks about the British attack on Breed's Hill, where the Americans built their defenses, and then there was a fierce battle. The author further elucidates the significance of prominent individuals in the conflict, namely William Prescott, Israel Putnam, and Joseph Warren. On its whole, "A Full and Correct Account of the Battle of Bunker Hill" represents a significant primary source that offers crucial perspectives on a pivotal engagement during the American Revolution. This publication is highly
recommended for anybody with an interest in the historical events surrounding the American Revolution and the arduous quest for independence.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Brue, Sandy. "The Battle of Bunker Hill: Now We Are at War Revised. Teaching with Historic Places." 2002.
Sandy Brue’s article, “The Battle of Bunker Hill: Now We Are at War. Revised. Teaching with Historic Places,” was published in 2002. In the article, Brue examines the historical significance of the Battle of Bunker Hill and provides educational resources to teach about the battle in the classroom. Brue thoroughly describes the action, covering the tactics the American and British forces used, the conflict's conclusion, and the events that preceded it. She delves into the social and political milieu of the day as well as the elements that contributed to the start of the American Revolution. Teachers can utilize the lesson plans and activities on this page to teach their students about the importance of the Battle of Bunker Hill in American history. The lesson plans are made to be dynamic and interesting, and they contain various exercises like role-
playing games, historical simulations, and the interpretation of original sources. All things considered, Brue's article offers educators and anybody else curious about the history of the Battle of Bunker Hill and its significance to the American Revolution some excellent resources. Anyone who wants to learn more about American history and the hardships faced by the American armies during the Revolution should read it.
Diamond, Sigmund. "Bunker Hill, Tory Propaganda, and Adam Smith." The New England Quarterly
, 1952: 363-374.
The paper "Bunker Hill, Tory Propaganda, and Adam Smith" by Sigmund Diamond was published in The New England Quarterly in 1952. Diamond's piece examines how lies affected how history was told about the Battle of Bunker Hill. In an attempt to defend its activities during the American Revolution, Diamond claims that the British government launched a propaganda campaign portraying the American armies as disorganized and undisciplined. He thinks this
advertising was meant to make the American Revolution look bad and boost support for the British side. Additionally, Diamond analyzes the influence of Scottish philosopher and economist
Adam Smith on the propaganda campaign of the British government. Smith worked closely with the British government during the American Revolution. He wrote several important books that supported the idea that the American Revolution was a waste of time and that the British government was right to do what it did. In summary, Diamond's essay offers a significant understanding of how political ideologies may impact how historical events are interpreted and how propaganda shapes historical narratives. People who want to learn more about the past of the American Revolution and how advertising changed people's minds should read this book.
Ellison, Amy. "Bunker Hill: A City, a Siege, a Revolution." Historian
, 2015: 138-139.
The article "Bunker Hill: A City, a Siege, a Revolution," authored by Amy Noel Ellison, was published in the Historian magazine in 2015. Within the article, Ellison provides a comprehensive analysis of the historical occurrences that preceded the Battle of Bunker Hill and its profound importance within the larger context of the American Revolution. Ellison looks at the social and political atmosphere of the time, such as the problems between the British government and the American colonies and the things that ended up starting the American Revolution. She also gives a thorough description of the Battle of Bunker Hill, covering the tactics used by the American and British soldiers, the circumstances leading up to the conflict, and the conclusion of the conflict.
According to Ellison, the American soldiers' bravery, resolve, and readiness to fight for their freedom were displayed during the Battle of Bunker Hill, which marked a significant turning point in the American Revolution. All things considered, Ellison's piece offers insightful
information on the historical relevance of the Battle of Bunker Hill and its part in the American Revolution. This publication is highly recommended for anybody interested in American history and the pursuit of independence.
Holmes, O.W. "The Battle of Bunker Hill." New England Journal of Education
, 1875: 283.
In 1875, the article "The Battle of Bunker Hill," written by O.W. Holmes, was published in the New England Journal of Education. In this piece, Holmes thinks about how important the Battle of Bunker Hill was during the American Revolution. Holmes contends that the Battle of Bunker Hill was a significant turning point in the war because it demonstrated that the American soldiers could maintain their ground against the British army. He also emphasizes the bravery and selflessness of the American soldiers participating in the conflict, pointing out that they were
prepared to put their lives in danger in defense of freedom. The article by Holmes offers readers insightful knowledge of the historical significance of the Battle of Bunker Hill and its part in the American Revolution. Anyone who has even a passing interest in the history of the United States
or the fight for independence needs to read it.
Hudson, Charles. Doubts Concerning the Battle of Bunker Hill. Addressed to the Christian public.
Boston and Cambridge: J Monroe & Co., 1857.
Charles Hudson investigates the circumstances leading up to the Battle of Bunker Hill. He casts doubt on the integrity of the historical accounts published about the conflict due to his findings in this book. Hudson bases his argument for a more genuine and authentic depiction of the battle on his religious views, as the book is directed primarily at the Christian public. In this
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
source, Hudson looks to discuss the war more from an authentic and Christian perspective than other accounts before his. Hudson's work is a significant contribution to the historiography of the American Revolution. This is because it questions some frequently held ideas about the fight and its role in the conflict. This book is well-researched and draws on a wealth of original sources, such as letters, diaries, and other reports written during the discussed period. In general, Hudson's Doubts Concerning the Battle of Bunker Hill is an excellent addition to any collection of literature on American history. This is especially true for anyone interested in the time surrounding the Revolutionary War.
Knollenberg, Bernhard. "Bunker Hill Re-Viewed: A Study in the Conflict of Historical Evidence." Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society
, 1957-60: 84-100.
Bernhard Knollenberg explores the historical narratives surrounding the Battle of Bunker Hill in his work "Bunker Hill Re-Viewed," pointing out the disparities in these stories. Through his study, Knollenberg exposes the bias and even contradictory nature of numerous accounts of the conflict, raising doubts about the veracity of the historical record. He investigates the possible social and political influences on the reporting and memory of the conflict and how these elements affected our comprehension of the American Revolution. Knollenberg's essay has greatly benefited the Battle of Bunker Hill and American Revolution historiography. Through his
analysis of the contradictions in the historical record, he pushes readers to reconsider their presumptions and consider different points of view. This method is especially useful in the modern world, when challenging the dominant narratives and exercising critical thought are becoming increasingly important.
The perspectives offered by "Bunker Hill Re-Viewed" go beyond the study of the American Revolution and encompass a wider range of historical inquiry. Anyone interested in history or the nuances of historical interpretation should read Knollenberg's examination of the difficulties in balancing contradicting information. All things considered, "Bunker Hill Re-
Viewed" is an invaluable tool for academics and history majors. Its analysis of the Battle of Bunker Hill is a helpful reminder of the value of challenging historical narratives' truthfulness and considering potential social or political influences. How the essay interprets historical events
provides insightful information useful for general historical study.
Kurtz, Henry. "Bunker Hill, 1775 'A Dear Bought Victory'"." History Today
, 1975.
In his 1975 History Today piece "Bunker Hill, 1775, 'A Dear Bought Victory,'" Henry Kurtz writes in detail about the Battle of Bunker Hill during the American Revolutionary War. In his book, Kurtz wants to give readers a thorough look at the battle, going beyond the usual stories to look at its strategic importance and the huge effects it had on the war as a whole. Kurtz carefully recreates the events leading up to the battle using a wide range of first-hand and second-hand sources. His work goes into detail about the strategies used by both the American and British armies, which helps us understand the difficulties each side faced. In this way, the piece helps us understand the complicated nature of this important dispute better. Kurtz's writing is interesting and useful so that many people can understand the historical story. But because the piece was written in 1975, people who read it should be aware of the period in which it was written. Even though Kurtz's work is still helpful for understanding the Battle of Bunker Hill, it is better to read more recent research along with it for a more complete and up-to-date view. To sum up, Henry Kurtz's paper is an important addition to our knowledge of the Revolutionary War
and the Battle of Bunker Hill. It is a useful resource because it has in-depth research and unique
views. Still, readers should also consider the historical background and look at other sources to get a complete picture of this important historical event.
Middlekauff, Robert. "Why Men Fought in the American Revolution." Huntington Library
Quarterly
, 1980: 135-148.
Robert Middlekauff's 1980 article "Why Men Fought in the American Revolution" is a notable academic examination of the many motivations behind individuals' decisions to enlist in the American Revolutionary War. It was published in the Huntington Library Quarterly. This essay examines the various environmental and personal factors that affected people's decision-
making during this significant period in American history. Middlekauff's research is noteworthy for his deft use of various original sources, including letters, diaries, and accounts from the time. By examining the above sources, the author demonstrates the intricate relationships between ideological, economic, political, and personal elements that drove people to participate in armed combat during the American Revolution. Middlekauff's viewpoint is notable for its in-depth analysis and detailed portrayal of the revolutionary experience. The article provides a comprehensive picture of the many factors that motivated the revolutionary struggle by linking the participants' accounts. In addition to searching for recurring patterns in his study, he investigates the conditions that led everyone to participate in the fight for autonomy. Despite being published more than 40 years ago, his research remains a crucial addition to American Revolution history. This work's lasting worth lies in its careful analysis of the human elements connected to conflict and revolution. The paper is a great resource for academics, students, and fans who want to understand the complex reasons why soldiers fought in the American
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Revolution. It provides enduring and insightful understandings of the complex web of historical decision-making.
Otis, James. A Vindication of the Conduct of the House of Representatives of the Province of the Massachussetts-Bay: More Particularly, in the Last Session of the General Assemble.
Boston: Edes and Gill, 1762.
This essay by James Otis, "A Vindication of the Conduct of the House of Representatives of the Province of Massachusetts-Bay," released by Edes and Gill in Boston in 1762, is an important primary source explaining the political situation in the years before the American Revolution. In this work, Otis strongly supports the acts of the Massachusetts House of Representatives, showing how things were getting worse between the American colonies and British rule. Otis, a famous person in colonial politics and a law scholar talks about important topics like taxation without representation from the colonial point of view. In his points, he goes into more detail about the bigger ideas of self-government and individual freedom, which set the stage for the revolutionary movement's ideas. The paper records the specific complaints of the Massachusetts House of Representatives and shows what people were thinking at the time. Otis's
law and philosophical ideas help us understand the political concepts that sparked revolutionary zeal. Thinking critically about this first-hand source is important because it gives a specific colonial point of view within its historical setting. Scholars and students interested in the American Revolution's intellectual roots still need to read Otis's work. It sheds light on the growth of political ideas that would later impact the writing of the U.S. Constitution. The book "A Vindication of the Conduct" is a good way to look at the ideas that led to colonial rebellion and the beginnings of freedom. Otis's work provides valuable insights into the grievances and frustrations of the American colonists, which ultimately fueled their desire for independence. By
looking at the work, readers can better understand the intellectuals behind the scenes that laid the
groundwork for the American Revolution. This primary source serves as a testament to the enduring relevance of Otis's ideas and their lasting impact on shaping the principles upon which the United States was founded. Swett, Samuel. "Who Was the Commander at Bunker Hill?"
DigitalCommons@Cedarville
, 1850.
"Who Was the Commander at Bunker Hill?" by Samuel Swett is a booklet that delves deeply into the contentious debate over who led the Battle of Bunker Hill during the American Revolution. Although most historical records identify William Prescott as the commander, Swett argues that Israel Putnam was the real leader. The author uses a wide range of original documents, including letters, diaries, and accounts from combat survivors, to support his claims. Swett draws attention to a letter from General Artemas Ward, the colonial men's leader at the time, that refers to Putnam as the "principal conductor" of the war. This primary source is an important piece of proof that backs up Swett's claim. The booklet also includes quotes from military accounts, such as those from John Trumbull and Joseph Warren, two of the participants who emphasize Putnam's key role in spearheading the fight. The booklet explores the difficulties of assigning commands during the tumultuous Battle of Bunker Hill and clarifies why official history may have ignored Putnam's role. Swett hypothesizes that Putnam's future military failures
may have led to his exclusion from historical recognition. In contrast, Prescott's previous reputation as a military commander may have affected the attribution of leadership. In addition to
shedding insight into the leadership dynamics of the Battle of Bunker Hill, Swett's research identifies the elements that contributed to the debate surrounding the conflict. This brochure is an
invaluable resource for academics and amateurs looking for more in-depth knowledge of the command structure of the conflict and the historical discussions surrounding it.
Tower, David Pulsifer, and Joseph Meredith. An Account of the Battle of Bunker Hill, compiled from authentic sources...with General Burgoynes' account of the Battle.
Boston: A. Williams and CO., 1875.
David Pulsifer Tower and Joseph Meredith wrote this book together in 1875. It tells the story of the Battle of Bunker Hill from many historical sources. This book serves as a significant historical resource, with the primary objective of providing a comprehensive and precise account
of the events that transpired during this crucial fight in the context of the American Revolutionary War. Authors show dedication to accuracy by gathering data from reliable first-
hand sources. Tower and Meredith use letters, diaries, and accounts from those who saw or took part in the conflict are among the major materials. Their narrative is more credible and comprehensive due to their reliance on firsthand accounts.
The fact that General Burgoyne's story of the Battle of Bunker Hill is included in the book makes it stand out. The inclusion of the viewpoint of a British military commander in the text enables the authors to present a more comprehensive analysis of the battle, highlighting the divergent perspectives held by the American and British forces. This book, published in 1875, offers a historical viewpoint on the Battle of Bunker Hill, situated within the context of the post-
Civil War period. The bibliography is a great resource for historians, scholars, and those interested in gaining insights into interpreting and documenting historical events during this specific time frame. Readers must consider any built-in biases or preconceived historical interpretations prominent throughout the late 19
th
century.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
In summary, the work titled "An Account of the Battle of Bunker Hill" by Tower and Meredith holds significant academic value as a historical source, contributing to the enhancement of our comprehension of the pivotal Revolutionary War engagement. The utilization of credible sources and incorporation of a wide range of opinions render it a significant addition to the historiography surrounding the Battle of Bunker Hill.