HIS_200__7
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2OO
Subject
History
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by MasterGuineaPig3681
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 1 Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Be sure to respond to this question in no more than one sentence, using proper grammar.
Three historical lenses that provide a fuller understanding of the relationship between Natives
and white settlers are economic factors, cultural perspectives, and the impact of government policies.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 2 Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be
longer than one sentence.
The complex relationship between Natives and white settlers in the early 19th century cannot be solely attributed to disputes over land; rather, it emerges from a confluence of socio-
cultural differences, economic interests, and the far-reaching consequences of government policies, collectively shaping a nuanced historical narrative.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 3 Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw.
Cultural Lens: One historical lens that could provide a deeper understanding of the events described in the video is the cultural lens. By delving into the cultural perspectives of both the Native Americans and the Pilgrims, we can gain insights into the dynamics that shaped their interactions. Examining their respective worldviews, values, and practices can offer a nuanced understanding of how cultural differences influenced the formation of alliances, negotiations, and ultimately, the trajectory of their relationships.
Political Lens: Another crucial lens to consider is the political lens. Analyzing the political motivations behind the alliances, especially focusing on the treaty signed in 1621, can unveil the power dynamics at play. Understanding how political decisions shaped the balance of power between the Pilgrims and the Wampanoag is essential. Exploring the consequences of the alliance as more English settlers arrived provides valuable insights into the long-term implications of political choices during that period.
Historiographical Lens: The historiographical lens is equally important in unraveling the complexity of the Thanksgiving narrative. By examining how interpretations of these events have evolved over time, we can discern the influence of different historical perspectives. Investigating how Abraham Lincoln played a role in popularizing the Thanksgiving myth and
understanding the motivations behind shaping historical narratives for political or cultural
purposes contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the story.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 4 Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.)
Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on the devastating impact of diseases, particularly smallpox or a similar European-origin disease, on
the Wampanoag people. This epidemic had significantly weakened the Wampanoag, creating a vulnerability that influenced Massasoit's strategic decision to seek an alliance with the Pilgrims for mutual defense against common enemies.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 5 Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.
One short-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims was the establishment of a mutual defense pact, formalized in the treaty signed on March 22, 1621. This alliance provided immediate benefits to both parties by creating a united front against common adversaries, particularly rival Native American groups.
However, one long-term consequence of the alliance was the eventual erosion of relations between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims as more English settlers, including both Puritans and non-religious individuals, arrived in New England. The influx of settlers shifted the balance of power, leading to strained relations and contributing to the gradual decline of the Wampanoag's influence in the region.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 6 How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about
your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it.
Through my research and writing, I discovered that my initial perception of the First Thanksgiving as a harmonious feast was oversimplified. The widely accepted narrative might
not align with historical realities, and it could be a myth used for specific purposes, such as promoting national unity during the Civil War. This experience emphasized the importance of critically examining historical narratives and seeking more nuanced perspectives to gain a more accurate understanding of events
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 7 Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee
Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite.
Political Lens: Explore the political decisions and policies that led to the Indian Removal Act of 1830, focusing on the motivations behind the legislation and its impact on the Cherokee Nation's sovereignty.
Cultural Lens: Examine the cultural clash between the Cherokee people and the U.S. government, emphasizing the disruption of Cherokee traditions, forced assimilation attempts, and the impact on Cherokee identity.
Economic Lens: Analyze the economic factors driving the removal, such as the desire for valuable land resources in the Southeast, and the economic consequences for both the Cherokee Nation and the United States.
Social Lens: Investigate the social dynamics during the removal, including the attitudes of white settlers toward Native Americans, the resistance and resilience of the Cherokee community, and the humanitarian perspectives of those opposing the removal policy.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 8 Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: "The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it." Cite at least three historical facts that support your position.
I agree with the thesis statement that "The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it." Here are three historical facts supporting this position:
Lack of Consensus within the Cherokee Nation: The Treaty of New Echota, signed in 1835, was negotiated and signed by a small faction of Cherokees, not the majority. The Cherokee Nation, led by Principal Chief John Ross, widely rejected the treaty, considering it illegitimate. The lack of consensus among the Cherokee people undermines the treaty's validity.
Violation of Previous Agreements: The treaty contradicted earlier agreements, particularly the Treaty of Hopewell (1785) and the Treaty of Holston (1791), which recognized the sovereignty of the Cherokee Nation and their right to their ancestral lands. The forced removal outlined in the Treaty of New Echota violated the principles established in these earlier treaties.
Questionable Legitimacy of Signatories: The individuals who signed the Treaty of New Echota did not represent the true interests of the Cherokee Nation. Notably, Major Ridge, one
of the signatories, and his followers were acting against the wishes of the majority of Cherokees. The treaty's legitimacy is further undermined by the fact that the signatories were not duly authorized representatives of the Cherokee people.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help