HIS 100 Module Two Activity 2
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
100-Q1960
Subject
History
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by ElderMongooseMaster1017
Jon burnham
HIS100
12/26/2023
Non-graded portion
:
List your historical research topic here: o
Chernobyl disaster Graded portion:
Distinguish between primary and secondary sources.
Primary Sources:
Primary sources are the raw, unmediated materials that directly relate to a specific time, event, or individual. They are firsthand accounts or artifacts created during the period under investigation. These sources offer a direct connection to the subject matter and provide unique insights into the thoughts, experiences, and creations of people from that particular time. Examples of primary sources include diaries, letters, speeches, interviews, original research studies, photographs, and artifacts such as tools or clothing. The key characteristic of primary sources is their proximity to the event, offering a direct, unfiltered glimpse into historical or cultural contexts.
Secondary Sources:
In contrast, secondary sources are interpretations, analyses, or discussions based on primary sources. These materials provide context, analysis, and commentary, helping readers understand and interpret the information found in primary sources. Secondary sources are created after the events they discuss and often benefit from hindsight. Examples include books, journal articles, documentaries, and biographies. These sources play a crucial role in synthesizing information, offering different perspectives,
and providing a deeper understanding of historical or cultural events. While primary sources are the building blocks of historical research, secondary sources contribute valuable context and analysis to the overall narrative.
In essence, primary sources are the foundational materials directly related to a particular time or event, while secondary sources contribute analysis and interpretation to help researchers and readers contextualize and understand the primary materials.
Explain why it is important to consult a variety of sources when conducting historical research. Include specific details and examples. Historical research resembles detective work, demanding a diverse array of sources to construct an accurate and thorough narrative of the past. Multiple perspectives are essential, akin to gathering eyewitness accounts, as each viewpoint enriches the overall understanding of events. Corroborating facts, understanding the contextual backdrop through various sources, and avoiding biases are crucial aspects, much like a detective cross-referencing evidence and considering witness motivations. Just as a detective gathers all available clues, historians must seek a variety of sources to ensure the completeness of information. Uncovering overlooked details, tracking the evolution of interpretations, and critically analyzing conflicting narratives contribute to a nuanced historical understanding. Ensuring representativeness by incorporating diverse sources is vital for comprehending the experiences of 1
different groups. Finally, historians tailor their source selection based on research objectives, much like a
detective tailoring an investigation to specific goals. In essence, historical research is a meticulous process of piecing together a comprehensive narrative from a range of sources, each contributing a valuable element to the historical puzzle.
Identify one primary
source that would help investigate your research question (include the title, author, and link to the source).
One primary source that could significantly contribute to investigating the research question about the impact of the Chernobyl disaster on global perceptions of nuclear energy safety is the "INSAG-7 Report - The Chernobyl Accident: Updating of INSAG-1."
Title: INSAG-7 Report - The Chernobyl Accident: Updating of INSAG-1
Author: International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (INSAG)
Link: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub913e_web.pdf?trk=public_post_comment-
text
This report, published by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), represents a comprehensive analysis and assessment of the Chernobyl disaster. It was prepared by the INSAG, an advisory group to the IAEA, and provides valuable insights into the technical aspects, causes, and consequences of the accident. Identify one secondary
source that would help investigate your research question (include the title, author, and link to the source).
Title: New Nuclear Power Plant in Belarus and Reminders of Chernobyl
Author: N/A (Authored by Heinrich Böll Foundation)
Link: https://eu.boell.org/en/2021/04/26/new-nuclear-power-plant-belarus-and-reminders-chernobyl
This source provide insights into the contemporary implications of the Chernobyl disaster, specifically focusing on Belarus and its new nuclear power plant. Analyzing the offers perspectives on how Chernobyl continues to influence decision-making in the nuclear energy sector and will provide valuable context for understanding the evolving perceptions and safety considerations related to nuclear power. Choose a current event related to the subject of your historical research question and explain how they are connected.
Current Event:
A recent event related to the subject of my historical research question on the impact of the Chernobyl disaster is the incident at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine, which occurred in December 2021. The incident involved a fire that broke out at a training building near the plant, raising concerns about the safety of nuclear facilities.
Connection:
This event is connected to the historical research question as it highlights ongoing discussions and challenges related to nuclear safety. While the Zaporizhzhia incident did not directly involve the reactor, it draws attention to the potential risks and safety considerations associated with nuclear power plants. The aftermath of the Zaporizhzhia incident and the subsequent discussions among policymakers and the public echo the historical impact of the Chernobyl disaster on global perceptions of nuclear energy safety. The connection lies in the persistent 2
need to address and mitigate risks associated with nuclear energy, drawing lessons from past incidents such as Chernobyl.
3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help