Intro to corrections_2003CJ_Dominique_Armstrong_Assessment1

docx

School

Griffith University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2003

Subject

History

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by DrTeamTapir23

Assessment 1 Recommendation Form Student name: Dominique Armstrong Student number: s5216963 Course name: Introduction to Corrections Course code: Course offering: Course mode: Assessment name: Assessment 1 – Sentence Recommendations

CASE 1: PROBATION OR PRISON Court: City Magistrates Court Magistrate: Edward Winston Case number: CM 8675309 BXY Offender name: Bill, COPELAND Offender number: D95709 Offence(s): Serious assault resulting in injury, Offensive behaviour, Offensive language, Disorderly conduct not elsewhere classified Assessment instrument: POP-RAT Total score: 22 Overall risk level: Elevated Assessment and report completed by: Dominique Provide a summary of your decision. What sentence do you recommend to the Court for this case: probation or imprisonment? (maximum 50 words) Provide a justification for your decision. What considerations led to the above recommendation? Are there any caveats to your recommendation that you would like the Court to be aware of? (maximum 200 words) Considering the defendants lack of prior criminal record, the Court should be inclined to offer the option of probation. Due to the elevated risk associated with this case, the Court should impose a set of specific conditions that must be adhered to in conjunction with the probationary period.

Provide a summary of the individual’s criminogenic needs. What targets for intervention are required for propensity-reduction? How will these treatments help the individual to either a) succeed on a probation order in the community or b) be rehabilitated while in custody? (maximum 125 words) Provide a summary of the individual’s supervision or security requirements. What measures need to be implemented for opportunity-reduction? How will these measures help the individual to either a) succeed on a probation order in the community or b) be rehabilitated while in custody? (maximum 125 words) The recommendation to consider Probation in this case is justified by the individual’s clean record, which indicates a lack of prior convictions and a history of responsible behaviour. Furthermore, the individual’s only exposure to risky environments has been limited to occasional visits to bars on the weekends with friends, rather than a pattern of reckless or criminal behaviour. By offering probation, the Court aims to provide the individual with an opportunity for rehabilitation (alcohol use). Given the presence of violence in this case, along with the VIS, it is recommended a more stringent probationary period be enforced in order to monitor the progress and behaviour, allowing for adequate time to assess their commitment to rehabilitation and ability to avoid violent incidents in the future. This recommendation takes into account the principle of proportionality, ensuring the punishment aligns with the offence, the defendants’ individual circumstances and victim impact. The elevated risk level associated with alcohol use at bars warrants the imposition of specific conditions to mitigate protentional future risks. These conditions should be designed to address the circumstances of the case and to safeguard public safety, while still In this case, the criminogenic needs were low as the individual has no prior criminal record, nor does his parents and friends. He has stable accommodation in a fairly safe neighbourhood and works full-time. He does not actively engage in risky criminal behaviours; however, the use of alcohol increases his risk of impulsivity and risk of upregulating his emotions (anger), particularly in high social environments like bars. The focus of intervention should be on addressing the individual’s alcohol-related issues and anger issues when feeling provoked. The key targets for intervention to reduce propensity for future criminal behaviour can include substance abuse treatments and anger management classes; this may include counselling or participation in specific classes, in order to develop coping strategies and enhance their self-control of alcohol and emotion in risky environments.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

In this case, the circumstances of alcohol and anger need to be addressed in the individual’s supervision requirements. Implementing a curfew is a practical and effective way to limit the individual’s exposure to high-risk social environments, such as bars and late-night gatherings with friends. By imposing a curfew, the individual is controlled to how late they are to stay out, decreasing their risk of engaging in activities that can lead to high alcohol use or confrontations. The individual also needs to take accountability on how they have impacted the victim for their financial burden of medical expenses and mental health issues due to this offence. Paying victim restitution is a crucial step in taking responsibility for the harm caused to the victim. It can contribute to the individual’s rehabilitation and the victims healing process.

CASE 2: PRISON OR PAROLE Parole Board: State Parole Board Application number: SDC-427561 Prisoner name: Robert Jacob SMITH Prisoner number: 427561 Offence(s): Child pornography, Non assaultive sexual offences against a child Original sentence: 3 years, Parole eligibility at 18 months Time served to date: 2 years Assessment instrument: RAPA Total score: 8 Overall risk level: Moderate Assessment and report completed by: Dominique Provide a summary of your decision. What outcome do you recommend to the Parole Board for this case: continued detention or conditional release? (maximum 50 words) Provide a justification for your decision. What considerations led to the above recommendation? Are there any caveats to your recommendation that you would like the Parole Board to be aware of? (maximum 200 words) It is recommended, in this case, based on the home assessment report, prison record misconduct and psychologist report that continued detention may be a more justifiable option. Mr SMITH’s assessment reveals that he is of moderate risk (54%) of breaching parole. The justification for continued detention in this case is grounded in several factors that collectively pose a significant risk to the individual’s successful reintegration into the community and the potential for harm to both the victim and community. The primary justifications include: The potential for a hostile and unsafe living arrangement at the parents’ house raises concerns about the individual’s ability to maintain stability and adhere to probation conditions. Given the history of volatile relationships, this environment may exacerbate the risk of further conflicts and potential criminal activities. Furthermore, the refusal of the parents to closely monitor the individual’s activities and behaviour pose a significant risk, as it leaves the individual without the necessary support and supervision. The multiple incidents of misconduct in prison, including insubordination and possession of unauthorised items, indicate a pattern of behaviour inconsistent with rehabilitation and cooperation. Such misconduct reflects a lack of commitment to following rules and may raise doubts about the individual’s ability to comply with probation conditions in the community. The individual’s failure to fully accept the harm inflicted on the victim suggest a lack of understanding and accountability. This attitude may increase the

Provide a summary of the individual’s criminogenic needs. What targets for intervention are required for propensity-reduction? How will these treatments help the individual to either a) eventually earn parole or b) succeed being supervised in the community? (maximum 125 words) Provide a summary of the individual’s supervision or security requirements. What measures need to be implemented for opportunity-reduction? How will these measures help the individual to either a) eventually earn parole or b) succeed being supervised in the community? (maximum 125 words) In this case, the individuals’ criminogenic needs include a history of abuse from very religious and strict parents, which may have likely contributed to the individual’s challenges, emotional distress, and potentially criminal behaviour. The confusion of his sexuality provided struggles for his mental health. The individual was also subjected to being a victim of the same crime he then later committed. To provide effective support, measures should be taken for specialised mental health care, which can include therapy, counselling, or support groups. Trauma-informed therapy to address the trauma associated with abusive parents, can help the individual process their experiences and develop coping strategies for their emotional healing. Family support should be encouraged to provide emotional support and a safe living space, which can be instrumental in the individuals healing and growth to eventually earn parole. In this case, the individual’s mental health, alternate housing and behaviour needs to be addressed to eventually earn parole. Ensure mental health services within the prison are accessible to the individual, which is a critical step in reducing the propensity for further criminal behaviour. Trauma-informed care/ therapy to address their experiences of trauma as a victim of family violence. This can help process their past and develop coping strategies for emotional healing. The individual also needs to explore more secure housing options that provide a stable and supportive environment to reduce the risk of exposure to reoffending. Implementing a behavioural contract or agreement that outlines the expectations and behavioural goals for the individual. This can help them understand the criteria for earning parole and to prove they can follow instructions/guidelines.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

CASE 3: PAROLE OR PRISON Parole Office: Probation and Parole District 19 Parolee name: Andrew ROBERTSON Parolee number: 7165PPD Offence(s): Possessions of drug paraphernalia, Attempted robbery Original sentence: 2 years Time served in custody: 6 months Time served on current parole order: 6 months Assessment instrument: PRAC Total score: 10 Overall risk level: Moderate Assessment and report completed by: Dominique Provide a summary of your decision. What outcome do you recommend to the Parole Board for this case: continued community supervision or revocation of order? (maximum 50 words) Provide a justification for your decision. What considerations led to the above recommendation? Are there any caveats to your recommendation that you would like the Parole Board to be aware of? (maximum 200 words) Implementing stricter conditions while continuing community supervision is a prudent recommendation in this case, especially given the unique criminogenic needs and potential risks associated with the individual’s circumstances. Mr ROBERTSON is at moderate risk, however, has less than half a chance (36%) to commit a new offence. The justification for continued community supervision should be proportionate to the perceived risk and the individual’s behaviour. Revoking parole for the individual who has; not been convicted of new offences since being on parole (although it is suspected some drug use was used it has not been confirmed) and missing a few appointments may be seen as overly punitive. It is also more cost-effective to keep him in the community than incarceration. Given the individual is not considered high risk to the community, keeping them on community supervision with stricter conditions offers a balanced approached to address concerns without unnecessarily disrupting the individual’s life. By addressing the suspicion of drug use through stricter supervision and treatment rather than incarceration, there is a balance of the need for safety with the principle of rehabilitation. Under stricter conditions, the individual is more likely to comply with their parole requirements and actively engage in treatment when under close scrutiny. This can be motivating to the

Provide a summary of the individual’s criminogenic needs. What targets for intervention are required for propensity-reduction? How will these treatments help the individual to either a) succeed on the supervision order or b) be rehabilitated while in custody? (maximum 125 words) Provide a summary of the individual’s supervision or security requirements. What measures need to be implemented for opportunity-reduction? How will these measures help the individual to either a) succeed on the supervision order or b) be rehabilitated while in custody? (maximum 125 words) The history of drug use, which is evident in this case, can lead to criminal activity, including drug related offences and property crimes to support the addiction. Addressing this need would involve providing addiction treatment and support to help overcome the drug-related issues. The individuals lack of employment has led to financial difficulties and increased susceptibility to engage in criminal activities to support the habit. Interventions aimed at improving employability through job training and education, or job placement programs can be crucial in addressing this need. The breakdown of his marriage has decreased his support system. Addressing this may involve family counselling, conflict resolution, or efforts to rebuild healthy family relationships. Strong family ties and social support can act as a protective factor against criminal behaviour. In this case, the supervision requirements call for a stricter approach. It is required that the individual participate in employment /educational programs which can reduce idle time and increase financial stability and accountability. Regular drug testing to occur twice a week for a month and then reduced to once a week for two months, then random tests thereafter, in order to ensure compliance with the order. This will be in conjunction with continued treatment programs, which can address the root causes of substance use and criminal behaviour. Restricting associations with individuals/social groups who may encourage or facilitate drug use can help prevent relapse. It can also help reduce peer- pressure, avoid high-risk situations, and maintain accountability for the commitment to recovery.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Intro to corrections_2003CJ_Dominique_Armstrong_Assessment1

Related Documents