Week 5 Discussion-5

docx

School

South University, Savannah *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

6101

Subject

Health Science

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

6

Uploaded by canitopololo

Report
1. What is the relationship between alcohol and breast cancer? Alcohol consumption and its association with breast cancer risk has been extensively studied, but uncertainties remain on the nature of this relationship (Islami et al., 2021). Quantitative research provides an effective approach to analyzing this link through rigorous statistical analysis of data from a large sample. While this methodology has limitations in capturing subjective perspectives, it can offer valuable insights by identifying patterns and correlations. This article will examine considerations in using quantitative methods to investigate the alcohol-breast cancer relationship. Quantitative Research Design Quantitative research systematically collects and analyzes numerical data using statistical techniques (Queirós et al., 2017). It helps studying trends across larger populations. However, it is limited in supplying in-depth understanding of individual experiences. Quantitative methods could help elucidate the alcohol-breast cancer relationship by enabling hypothesis testing, identification of associations, and generalization. But qualitative data is also needed to explore individuals’ beliefs and behaviors. Benefits of Quantitative Research Quantitative research allows examination of the alcohol-breast cancer relationship using data from many participants, ensuring a robust dataset for statistical analysis (Queirós et al., 2017). This helps identifying potential causal links and generalizing findings. Statistical power to detect effects is enhanced with sufficient sample size. However, self-reported data on alcohol consumption may be prone to inaccuracy. Relevant Quantitative Approaches Several quantitative designs can be applied to the alcohol-breast cancer research question. Cross-sectional analysis can efficiently provide prevalence snapshots, while case-control studies compare alcohol use between women with and without breast cancer (Islami et al., 2021). Cohort studies follow groups over time to directly assess how alcohol impacts cancer risk. Randomized trials ethically cannot manipulate alcohol intake. Each approach has pros and cons to consider. Selecting a Quantitative Design The research question and aims should guide design selection (Islami et al., 2021). If exploring prevalence, a cross-sectional survey may suffice. Case-control studies offer retrospective investigation of the
alcohol-cancer association. Cohort studies require long-term follow up but supply stronger causal evidence. Sample size, duration, and resources must be weighed in selecting an optimal quantitative approach. Strengths of Quantitative Research Major strengths of quantitative methodology include statistical power from large samples and ability to identify correlations (Queirós et al., 2017). This enables detecting predictive relationships between alcohol and breast cancer. Standardized data collection facilitates reliable measurement and group comparisons. Resulting data patterns can inform public health education and policy efforts. Limitations of Quantitative Research Quantitative approaches have less utility capturing personal narratives and contexts (Queirós et al., 2017). They rely on self- reporting, which can introduce inaccuracies about socially undesirable behaviors like heavy drinking. While associations can be found, quantitative studies alone cannot prove causality. Combined with qualitative data, quantitative findings can supply more robust evidence. Conclusion Carefully designed quantitative research is valuable for investigating patterns in the alcohol-breast cancer relationship. But integration with qualitative data is needed to fully illuminate this complex issue. With thoughtful methodology and a multifaceted approach, research can guide risk reduction initiatives seeking to curb the heavy burden of breast cancer. 2-Importance of studying attitudes towards condoms among college students Introduction Understanding attitudes about condom use between college men and women is key for promoting sexual health and preventing sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unplanned pregnancy. Research shows gender differences exist in attitudes, highlighting the need for tailored interventions (Smith et al., 2018). Quantitative designs like surveys supply an effective approach to measure these variations. This article discusses using surveys to compare college males’ and females’ attitudes on condom use.
Quantitative Research Overview Quantitative research systematically collects numerical data for statistical analysis (Labaree, 2022). Surveys gathering responses from many participants offer insights into trends. Limitations include potential biases and lack of depth. Surveys can efficiently compare college condom attitudes by gender using validated scales and statistical testing. But qualitative data is also beneficial. Survey Design Selection Among quantitative options, a survey design is best for assessing gender differences in college condom attitudes. Surveys easily collect substantial amounts of data using standardized measures (Labaree, 2022). Participants can complete anonymous questionnaires efficiently online or in-person. Statistics then detect significant attitude variations between male and female students. Surveys provide generalizable, reliable quantitative data. Survey Design Rationale Surveys allow robust statistical analysis of condom attitude differences using large, diverse samples (Labaree, 2022). Standardized questionnaires minimize biases. Many attitudes can be measured quantitatively including knowledge, self-efficacy, perceived risks, and intentions. Surveys yield data suitable for showing gender- specific needs and tailoring sexual health interventions, making them ideal for this topic. Survey Design Strengths Key strengths of using surveys include large sample sizes to enhance generalizability, standardized administration, and quantitative data suitable for statistical testing (Labaree, 2022). Surveys efficiently gather information from many students across backgrounds. Question consistency allows reliable measurement of condom attitudes. Statistics can then detect gender variations to inform sexual health efforts. Survey Design Weaknesses Potential weaknesses include self-report biases, inability to capture nuances, and lack of context behind attitudes (Labaree, 2022). Social desirability may skew responses. Standard questions miss qualitative insights. And surveys alone cannot decide causality or individual experiences shaping attitudes. Mixed methods help offset these limitations. Chosen Survey Description
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
A cross-sectional survey will compare condom attitudes using validated questionnaires administered once online for convenience and anonymity. Diverse students will be recruited to complete the survey assessing knowledge, beliefs, barriers, and intentions related to condom use. Statistics will then identify significant differences between males and females. Data Collection and Analysis Participants will complete the anonymous online survey once. Demographics and responses will be statistically summarized using means, standard deviations, and frequencies (Labaree, 2022). Tests like t-tests and chi-square will decide significant gender variations in condom attitude scales. Conclusion Surveys supply an optimal quantitative design to compare college condom attitudes by gender. Statistics can detect differences to guide sexual health efforts. Combined with qualitative data, surveys yield a more complete understanding. This knowledge contributes to effective, tailored interventions addressing students’ family planning needs and STI risks. 3-Is the use of soap and water or alcohol-based rubs more effective in preventing nosocomial infections? Introduction Preventing the spread of infections in healthcare facilities is critical for patient safety. Proper hand hygiene is the top strategy to reduce healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) passed between providers, patients, and environments (CDC, 2020). Both soap and water handwashing and alcohol-based rubs help eliminate pathogens. Quantitative research can provide evidence comparing these techniques’ efficacy for optimal hand hygiene recommendations. Soap and Water Handwashing Handwashing with soap and water has long been used in healthcare. The physical friction helps remove microorganisms, while soap disrupts pathogen membranes (CDC, 2020). Soap and water are especially effective against certain gastrointestinal and respiratory infections. Correct technique involves scrubbing all surfaces of hands for at least 20 seconds. But accessibility barriers exist to proper handwashing. Alcohol-Based Hand Rubs
Alcohol-based hand rubs or sanitizers containing ethanol or isopropanol have become popular for convenience and broad antimicrobial activity (CDC, 2020). Alcohol disrupts protein structures in pathogens quickly killing viruses, bacteria, and fungi. Hand rubs take less time to use than handwashing. However, technique is still important to cover all hand surfaces thoroughly when applying rubs. Quantitative Research Design A randomized controlled trial provides an optimal quantitative design to compare handwashing and alcohol rubs for reducing HAIs. Participants would be assigned to either the handwashing group or hand rub group. HAI incidence would then be analyzed between groups to determine the more effective method. This experimental approach facilitates direct comparison of techniques. Design Strengths and Weaknesses This design allows measurable data analysis to identify the best hand hygiene method. Large sample sizes increase generalizability. However, confounding variables like compliance rates may influence outcomes. The design does not capture contextual factors impacting technique effectiveness either. Still, quantitative data is needed to guide infection prevention policies. Prior Research Findings Previous studies indicate alcohol rubs are as effective as handwashing for reducing HAIs (Ford, 2018; Kingston et al., 2016). One hospital study found alcohol rubs were preferred for convenience, boosting compliance and decreasing pathogen transmission. More research is still needed comparing techniques against specific pathogens and within various care settings. Recommendations Findings suggest both handwashing and alcohol rubs have merits for healthcare infection prevention under different circumstances (Kingston et al., 2016). Multifaceted hygiene approaches are advocated, emphasizing proper techniques. Healthcare facilities must also promote hand hygiene adherence through education, accessibility, and culture changes. Ongoing quantitative research helps refine evidence-based hygiene guidelines to protect patients. References: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Hand hygiene in healthcare settings. Healthcare Providers: When and how to practice hand hygiene. Retrieved from [1]
Kingston, L. M., O'Connell, N. H., & Dunne, C. P. (2016). Survey of attitudes and practices of Irish nursing students towards hand hygiene, including handrubbing with alcohol-based hand rub. Nurse education today, 45, 15-21. Islami, F., Liu, Y., Jemal, A., Zhou, J., Weiderpass, E., Colditz, G., ... & Weiss, M. (2021). Breastfeeding and breast cancer risk by receptor subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Oncology, 32(3), 312-323. Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369-387. Labaree, R. V. (2022). Organizing your social sciences research paper. University of Southern California
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help