ihp 670 dis $
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
670
Subject
Health Science
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by giantsbaby
Hello Class,
A program planning model serves as a structured framework essential for the effective development and
implementation of various interventions, initiatives, or projects. It helps organizations and planners
systematically address complex issues, define goals, allocate resources efficiently, and assess the impact
of their efforts. Two commonly used program planning models are the logic model and intervention
mapping, each with its own set of similarities and differences. The logic model and intervention mapping
share a fundamental similarity in their aim to provide a structured approach to program planning. Both
models emphasize the importance of clearly defining the problem or issue at hand and the desired
outcomes.
They also encourage the identification of relevant inputs, activities, and outputs necessary to achieve
those outcomes. Moreover, both models advocate for ongoing evaluation and monitoring to gauge the
program's effectiveness and make necessary adjustments. However, there are notable differences
between the two models as well. Firstly, the logic model is relatively simpler and linear in its approach. It
outlines inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impacts in a sequential manner, making it a useful tool
for visualizing the program's logic and expected results. Logic models illustrate how a project, program,
or policy is understood or intended to produce particular results (Logic Model - MN Dept. Of Health,
n.d.). On the other hand, intervention mapping is a more comprehensive and iterative model. It places a
stronger emphasis on theory-based planning, needs assessment, and the incorporation of behavioral
change theories, making it particularly suitable for health-related interventions and complex behavior
change programs. Secondly, the logic model tends to be more process-oriented, focusing on the "how"
of program implementation and providing a clear roadmap.
In contrast, intervention mapping is more theory-driven and delves deeply into the "why" by identifying
behavioral determinants, theoretical constructs, and underlying causes, making it a robust choice for
interventions requiring a deeper understanding of the target population's behavior and context. IM
provides guidelines and tools to ensure health promotion program is based on empirical evidence and
sound theories. IM is also used for the planning and development of implementation strategies for
program adoption, implementation, and maintenance (Fernandez et al., 2019). In summary, while both
the logic model and intervention mapping are valuable program planning models, the choice between
them depends on the nature of the program, its complexity, and the depth of understanding required
about the target population's behavior and context. The logic model offers a straightforward, linear
approach, while intervention mapping provides a more in-depth, theory-driven methodology for
planning and executing interventions.
References
Fernandez, M. E., Ruiter, R. A. C., Markham, C. M., & Kok, G. (2019). Intervention Mapping: Theory- and
Evidence-Based Health Promotion Program Planning: Perspective and Examples. Frontiers in public
health, 7, 209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00209
Logic model - MN Dept. of Health. (n.d.).
https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/practice/resources/phqitoolbox/logicmodel.html
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help