Universal Health care system
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Hajvery University, Lahore (Euro Campus) *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
GERONTOLOG
Subject
Health Science
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by SuperHumanFieldPrairieDog27
The advantages of telehealth should be recognized by patients as well as medical professionals. There are now more options for illness prevention because to telemedicine. Video chat or phone consultations with doctors can be just as beneficial as in-person meetings. Enabling remote consultations using video chat is advantageous for all parties engaged in the provision of healthcare services. Some of the problems in healthcare have been solved by the rise of telemedicine.
People who need medical attention but live in remote places may now video chat with their doctors. Individuals with physical or mental disabilities who are unable to receive conventional medical care might also profit. There is hope for better communication between healthcare professionals and emergency rooms thanks to telemedicine, which has the potential to reduce pressure on overworked departments.
Among other health outcomes, telehealth may improve treatment program adherence and lower hospitalization rates. A comprehensive physical examination is necessary in certain circumstances, even though certain medical disorders can be detected solely via speech. Blood draws and cheek swabs are two uncomfortable procedures that are frequently connected to lab appointments.
Because local rules and regulations can be confusing and complex, figuring out the restrictions on telemedicine visits can be difficult. Until safe means of transmitting electronic patient data are
developed, some healthcare practitioners are reluctant to use telehealth and electronic health records (EHRs).
Furthermore, the use of online consultations and telemedicine may call for certain hardware or software, such a smartphone with an app that works with it. Potential consumers may be deterred
from using virtual appointment services by worries about technological issues, app downloads, and the inconvenience of having to create yet another login and password.
For the most latest information on telehealth efficacy, it is important to refer to scholarly papers and studies. During telemedicine sessions, protecting patient privacy is essential.
But not every patient or healthcare facility is a good fit for telemedicine consultations. Treatment
delivery may be hampered by technical problems with medical equipment, and it is still not possible to diagnose patients only by eye inspection. It is necessary to weigh patients before starting chemotherapy or giving them prescription drugs for children.
From the standpoint of healthcare providers, a positive telehealth encounter is characterized by a number of elements. These include equitable compensation for the time spent on telehealth services, user-friendly technology, administrative assistance, and provider participation in the advancement of telemedicine. Doctors can learn more about their patients' medical histories during private consultations, which can help them understand the underlying reasons of their problems.
In conclusion, telehealth is a fast expanding area of the healthcare industry that includes a range of medical services. Acknowledging its advantages while tackling its drawbacks is crucial.
Research studies and scholarly publications offer important insights into the efficacy of telehealth and how it affects the provision of healthcare.
Word: All people ought to be able to afford and receive first-rate medical care.
The primary goal of the government should be ensuring everyone's security. They determine the costs of healthcare facilities, drugs, and medical services. Under a universal health care system, no one, regardless of where they live, would be denied access to essential medical care due to a lack of funding. Furthermore, the government uses the tax revenue it receives to pay for every citizen's medical expenses. Public health insurance is accessible to all citizens of the United States. Under this plan, every citizen would have the same level of protection regardless of their financial circumstances. Everyone could access the care they require whenever they needed it if they all had health insurance. All phases of care, from preventive to end-of-life, are covered.
A Recognized Writing Commitment
Every individual is free to choose whether or not to obtain health insurance, and if they do, what kind and how much coverage they want. This is the worst option available since the customer's willingness to pay for loss compensation may differ significantly based on the cost of the plan and the required level of protection. Anyone can choose to get health insurance if they so desire. It is disturbing to think that more people would have to forgo health insurance. Since insurance companies are for-profit businesses, they are motivated to sell their clients more expensive products. To succeed financially in today's market, companies must hold their employees to high standards. Access to care has increased even though doctors are compensated more for seeing patients than for the efficacy of their treatments. FFS is the least advised type of health coverage because its effects on the caliber of healthcare are largely unproven.
Solutions for affordable security
Societies as a whole benefit from universal health coverage. Companies with fifty or more employees are required to provide health insurance to their staff. Policyholders have four options, each with a different price and set of benefits. In the US, if your yearly income is at or below the federal poverty line, you may be eligible for free medical care. To safeguard its citizens, the government tightly regulates the insurance sector. Preventive care models do not charge patients, in contrast to fee-for-service models that require patients to pay for each treatment they receive.
ChatGPT
Universal access to high-quality healthcare at a reasonable cost should be the aim.
In order to prioritize citizen security, the government should establish reasonable costs for medical services, prescription drugs, and healthcare facilities. The goal of universal health care systems is to remove any financial or geographic limitations that may be preventing someone from receiving essential medical care.
In such a system, each person has access to public health insurance, with tax revenue from the government being used to pay for medical costs. This strategy guarantees access to critical healthcare services whenever needed, covering the full range from preventive care to end-of-life hospice care, and it guarantees equal protection for all individuals, irrespective of their financial situation.
Personal Preference in Medical Care
It should ultimately be up to each individual to decide whether or not to purchase health insurance and what kind and extent of coverage they desire. This method acknowledges that, depending on individual circumstances, preferences and willingness to pay for coverage can differ significantly. People ought to be free to choose health insurance if they so choose, without being forced to. It would be concerning if more people were forced to forgo health insurance.
Reasons for Profit in the Insurance Sector
It's critical to recognize that insurance companies are for-profit businesses, which encourages them to provide clients with more expensive coverage options. In order to succeed financially in the highly competitive market of today, businesses frequently place strict standards on their employees. Nevertheless, there are drawbacks to the fee-for-service (FFS) model, which pays medical professionals according to the quantity of patients they see rather than the efficacy of their care, and there is insufficient data to conclude that it improves the quality of care.
Reasonably Priced Coverage Options
There are many advantages for society as a whole from universal health coverage. It is usually required of employers with fifty or more employees to offer their employees health insurance options. There are four different coverage options available to policyholders, each with pros and cons of its own. Free medical care may be available in the US for people whose yearly income is at or below the federal poverty line. Government regulation of the insurance sector is stringent and intended to protect citizens' interests. Unlike fee-for-service systems that charge patients for each treatment they receive, preventive care models do not levy such fees.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
In conclusion, everyone should be able to agree that access to high-quality healthcare at a reasonable cost is a universal goal. For all citizens to have access to healthcare and to fair pricing, governments play a critical role. While the importance of individual choice in healthcare
decisions cannot be overstated, it is imperative to address the insurance industry's profit-driven practices and promote alternatives to expensive coverage. The general welfare of society is enhanced and the interests of universal health coverage are served.