Artificial Reef Answer Sheet
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Lone Star College System, Woodlands *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1405
Subject
Geography
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by ColonelChinchilla3127
Artificial Reef Answer Sheet
Name: Aaliyah Shelton
Answer the following questions based on the Artificial Reef case study and the videos. Ethical Considerations
1. Who has the responsibility for correcting any harm to coral reefs caused by overfishing, pollution, and global climate change? The responsibility for correcting any harm to coral reefs caused by overfishing, pollution, and global climate change falls on multiple parties, including governments, businesses, and individuals. Governments can implement policies and regulations to reduce pollution and overfishing, and to mitigate the impacts of climate change. Businesses can adopt sustainable practices and reduce their environmental footprint, while individuals can make lifestyle changes to reduce their impact on the environment and support conservation efforts. Ultimately, it will take a collective effort from all stakeholders to protect and restore coral reefs and other vulnerable ecosystems.
2. What are the pros and cons of using artificial structures to protect endangered species? Artificial structures can be used to protect endangered species in a variety of ways, such as creating artificial reefs, building nesting sites, and providing habitats for wildlife. Some of the pros and cons of using artificial structures to protect endangered species include:
Pros:
1. Artificial structures can provide habitats for endangered species that have lost their natural habitats due to human activities, such as deforestation or urbanization.
2. Artificial structures can help to restore damaged ecosystems by providing new habitats for wildlife and
promoting biodiversity.
3. Artificial structures can be designed to be more resilient to climate change and other environmental stressors than natural habitats.
4. Artificial structures can provide opportunities for research and education, helping to raise awareness about the importance of conservation and environmental protection.
Cons:
1. Artificial structures can be expensive to build and maintain and may require ongoing funding and resources to remain effective.
2. Artificial structures can alter the natural environment, potentially disrupting ecological processes and interactions.
3. Artificial structures can be less effective than natural habitats at supporting biodiversity and promoting ecosystem health.
4. Artificial structures can be vulnerable to damage from storms, pollution, and other environmental stressors, potentially causing harm to the species they were intended to protect.
Overall, the use of artificial structures to protect endangered species can be a useful tool in conservation
efforts, but it should be used in conjunction with other strategies to promote the long-term health and sustainability of ecosystems.
3. Who should pay for the maintenance and protection of artificial reefs on existing oil rigs? The responsibility for the maintenance and protection of artificial reefs on existing oil rigs falls on multiple parties, including the oil companies that own the rigs, the government agencies that regulate them, and the environmental organizations that promote their use. In some cases, oil companies may be required by law to maintain and protect artificial reefs on their rigs as a condition of their permits. In other cases, environmental organizations may work with government agencies and oil companies to develop and implement artificial reef programs. Ultimately, the responsibility for maintaining and protecting artificial reefs on existing oil rigs should be shared among all stakeholders to ensure the long-term health and sustainability of these important ecosystems.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help