W11 ProConVideoand Structure
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Brigham Young University, Idaho *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
150
Subject
English
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by DeaconSnake3681
ENG 150
Model Essay and Video Structure Worksheet
Pro/Con
Step 1: Analyze a Video
Choose ONE
of the following videos and complete the table below.
Ice Baths for Athlete
s (8:17)
The COVID Vaccine
(3:32)
Which video did you watch?
The COVID Vaccine
How does the video introduce the topic? Do they give definitions, background, a historical overview, share a story, or something else?
The video introduces the topic by discussing the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, which the FDA has authorized under an emergency use authorization. The speakers explain the vaccine's benefits and risks, including its efficacy in preventing COVID-19 and the potential adverse effects that may occur after vaccination. They also provide advice on how to manage any symptoms that may occur and encourage patients to report any adverse events to the V-
Safe app.
How do they introduce the main body of information? Do they start with the pros or cons first? Or did they go back and forth, one benefit then one drawback, then another benefit, etc.?
The video introduces the main body of information by discussing the benefits of getting the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine first, followed by the potential adverse effects associated with the vaccine. The speakers alternate between discussing the benefits and drawbacks of the vaccine and providing detailed information about each aspect. They also provide guidance on what to do if one experiences a serious adverse reaction and how to report any adverse events to the V-Safe app, a CDC-supported platform.
How does the video end? Do they give recommendations? Argue a specific side? Leave it up to you to decide?
The video ends by seeking the viewer's consent to administer the COVID-19 vaccine and thanking them for watching. The speakers provide important information about the vaccine, including its benefits and risks, and encourage the viewer to seek medical advice and report any
adverse events if they choose to get vaccinated. The video does not argue a specific side or provide recommendations but aims to empower the viewer to make an informed decision about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.
Does this video structure help you consider how you might introduce your topic, organize information, and/or end your paper? Or will you do something very different? Why?
The video offers an effective framework for presenting information clearly and concisely, providing contextual information, and concluding with a call to action. While this format can be useful, it may not be the best fit for my essay,
which aims to weigh the pros and cons of a particular topic and equip readers with information to make an informed decision. There is no need for a call to action or further persuasive language, as my essay is focused on presenting
ENG 150
Model Essay and Video Structure Worksheet
Pro/Con
facts without imposing opinions or influencing readers' decisions.
Step 2: Analyze a Model Essay
Read the Model Essay you downloaded with the packet and answer the following questions.
How does the paper introduce
the topic? Do they give definitions, background, a historical overview, share a story, or something else?
The paper discusses the ongoing debate on whether college athletes should be compensated. It starts by telling the story of Ray McElrathbey and his little brother Fahmarr and then explains that NCAA rules prohibit any form of compensation for college athletes in order to maintain their amateur status.
What’s the thesis of this essay? (Paraphrase or quote it
from the essay.)
The thesis of this essay is that the debate on whether college athletes should receive payment is ongoing, and it's important to look at both the benefits and drawbacks of this
high-profile issue.
What's the main idea of each body paragraph in the essay? Write down 1 - 2 sentences for
each body paragraph. Next to the sentences about the main idea, write the number of sources used in that paragraph.
Body Paragraph 1: The story of Ray McElrathbey and his little brother Fahmarr exemplifies the strict rules concerning
compensation for college athletes, which has led to a debate on whether they should be paid. (1 source)
Body Paragraph 2: The NCAA prohibits college athletes from
receiving any monetary compensation and maintaining "amateur" status in order to create a level playing field for all athletes and schools, and prevent a celebrity culture for top athletes. (1 source)
Body Paragraph 3: Paying college athletes would be disastrous for college sports, as it could lead to a bidding war where only the richest schools could afford top athletes, ruin team camaraderie, and only benefit a small group of men who are likely to be signed to pro teams later.
(2 sources)
Body Paragraph 4: Those against paying college athletes argue that they already receive enough benefits, such as scholarships worth tens of thousands of dollars, free food/housing/textbooks, top medical care, top coaching, travel perks, and free gear. In addition, the NCAA is a non-
profit organization where over 95% of its profits are redistributed to its members' institutions. (2 sources)
How does the paper end? Do they give recommendations? The paper does not explicitly give recommendations or argue for a specific side. Instead, it presents both sides of
ENG 150
Model Essay and Video Structure Worksheet
Pro/Con
Argue for a specific side? Give too much of their own opinion? Leave it up to you to decide?
the ongoing debate on whether college athletes should be paid. It highlights the benefits and drawbacks of each side and provides insights from different experts and researchers. The paper ends by emphasizing the importance
of considering all perspectives and being informed about the issue before making a decision. It encourages readers to
continue to follow the debate as it evolves and to think critically about the potential implications of any changes to the current rules and policies.
Does it seem like everything in
the essay connects back to this
thesis? Why or why not? What
(if anything) should be added or left out?
Yes, the essay seems to connect back to the thesis that the debate on whether college athletes should get paid is far from over. The writer explores the NCAA's position on amateurism and athlete compensation and presents arguments for and against paying college athletes. The essay highlights the challenges that college athletes face due to strict NCAA rules on compensation, using the story of
Ray McElrathbey and his brother Fahmarr as an example. The essay could be expanded by exploring potential alternatives to the current system, such as allowing athletes
to profit from their name, image, and likeness and providing
more examples and statistics to support the arguments.
Does this sample paper help you consider how you might introduce your topic, organize information, and/or end your paper? Or will you do something very different? Why? (write 3 -5 sentences)
The sample paper provided is definitely helpful in guiding me on how to structure my paper. I plan to follow a similar organization by presenting the facts objectively without including any personal opinions or persuasive arguments. By
doing so, I can guarantee that my paper is informative, unbiased, and easy to understand for my readers. I also want to support my claims with credible sources and sufficient background information for readers who may not be familiar with the topic.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help