HW05-T-2023S-Solutions
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Texas A&M University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
260
Subject
English
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
Pages
13
Uploaded by CommodoreMosquitoMaster518
MEEN 260 Introduction to Engineering Experimentation Homework 5: Non-linear Regression and Sensor Characteristics
Assigned:
February 21, 2023 Due:
February 26, 2023, 11:59 PM General Instructions:
Follow the posted Homework Guidelines when completing your assignment. You may scan your hand-written pages, or use a tablet writing device to convert your document to PDF format. Note that each problem must have: •
A brief restatement of the problem in your own words (i.e. NOT a screen image of the problem statement) •
A clear, legible, organized solution in symbolic form. Include any references to data or values used in your calculations. •
Final answers identified (boxed, underlined) with appropriate significant digits and units
Problem #1:
A ping-pong is dropped from a prescribed height (
x
i
) and allowed to bounce on a hard surface. The time required to complete a ‘bounce’ (the time between one vertical maximum and the next) is recorded (
t
i
). All measured values are assumed to be known to five significant digits regardless of rounding in the data table.
Initial height, cm (
x
i
) Time to bounce, s (
t
i
) 12 0.47 9 0.4 6 0.33 3 0.23 You assume bounce time t
i
is the response variable, and that bounce time will fit the equation for parabolic motion having an unknown constant, k
(in s
2
/cm) that must be determined from the measured data: Eq. 1) ࠵?
!
= #࠵?࠵?
!
) Based on the given information, perform the following tasks: a) Define modified predictor/response variables (࠵?
!
∗
, ࠵?
!
∗
)
so that you can use a linear regression technique to determine the ‘best-fit’ value of k
. Write the linearized equation using the modified predictor/response variables. There are multiple methods to linearize the equation, but four possible transform equations are considered, the first and last pairs representing similar approaches: Transformation A: ࠵?
∗
= √࠵?
,
࠵?
∗
= ࠵?
࠵?
∗
= ࠵?࠵?
∗
,
࠵? = √࠵?
Transformation B: ࠵?
∗
= ࠵?,
࠵?
∗
= ࠵?
#
࠵?
∗
= ࠵?࠵?
∗
,
࠵? = ࠵?
Transformation C: ࠵?
∗
= ࠵?࠵?࠵?(࠵?),
࠵?
∗
= 2࠵?࠵?࠵?(࠵?)
࠵?
∗
= ࠵?
∗
+ ࠵? ,
࠵? = 10
$
Transformation D: ࠵?
∗
= ࠵?࠵?(࠵?),
࠵?
∗
= 2࠵?࠵?(࠵?)
࠵?
∗
= ࠵?
∗
+ ࠵? ,
࠵? = ࠵?
$
Transformations A and B result in a linear equation with unknown slope and zero intercept; Transformations C and D result in a linear equation with unity slope and unknown intercept. The equations to find the best-fit values of a single free parameter linear equation (either slope or intercept) were developed in HW04 and will be used here. Once the best-fit slope or intercept has been found, the value of ‘
k
’ for the non-linear equation can be determined, and predicted values of time, ࠵?
̂
!
can be calculated using the non-linear Eq 1. b) Create a new data table that includes columns for the original data, columns for the modified predictor/response variables, and columns for products of predictor/response variables needed to perform a linear regression using the modified variables. c) Calculate the best-fit value of k
from the linear regression of the modified variables (note that your regression calculation should be consistent with the linearized equation you state in part a). d) Using the value of k
found in part c and Eq. 1, calculate: the sum-of-squares of the residuals (
SSR
or S
2
r
), explained square variance (
SSE
, or S
2
e
), total square variance (
SST
, or S
2
t
) e) Calculate the correlation coefficient, r (note that ࠵? = √࠵?
#
), the adjusted correlation coefficient, r’
(
࠵?
%
= √1 − ࠵?
#
), the coefficient of determination, R
2 The best resource to calculate and show the required intermediate data is a spreadsheet calculation with data table. All four transformation cases have been calculated, and the spreadsheet table calculations for parts b-e have been determined. Transformation A Initial height, cm (
x
i
)
Time to bounce, s (
t
i
)
12
0.47
9
0.4
6
0.33
3
0.23
a)
Transformed variables: x*= xi^0.5, y* = (ti)
Transformed Equation: y*=(k^0.5)*x*= ax*
CURVE-FIT TABLE FOR TRANSFORMED EQUATION
GOODNESS-OF-FIT CALCULATION FOR PREDICTIVE EQUATION
b) & d)
xi = xi
ti = yi
x*i
y*i
x*i y*i
x*i^2
t^i=y^i
t-bar=ybar
(ti-tbar)^2
t^i-tbar)^2
(ti - t^i)^2
12
0.47
3.46410162
0.47
1.62812776
12
0.46590216
0.3575
0.01265625
0.01175103
1.67923E-05
9
0.4
3
0.4
1.2
9
0.40348311
0.3575
0.00180625
0.00211445
1.2132E-05
6
0.33
2.44948974
0.33
0.80833162
6
0.32944258
0.3575
0.00075625
0.00078722
3.10721E-07
3
0.23
1.73205081
0.23
0.39837169
3
0.23295108
0.3575
0.01625625
0.01551243
8.70887E-06
Sums
30
1.43
10.6456422
1.43
4.03483106
30
1.43177892
1.43
0.031475
0.03016513
3.79439E-05
SST
SSE
SSR
The equation for best-fit value of slope y = ax is:
c) a = Sum(x*i y*i)/Sum(x*i^2)
a* =
0.13449437
k = (a*)^2=
0.01808874
e)
r^2 =(SSE)/(SSE+SSR)
0.99874371
r = sqrt(r^2)
0.99937166
r' = sqrt(1=r^2)
0.03544423
R^2 = 1-(SSR/SST)
0.99879447
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Transformation B Transformation C Initial height, cm (
x
i
)
Time to bounce, s (
t
i
)
12
0.47
9
0.4
6
0.33
3
0.23
a)
Transformed Variable definitions: x*= xi, y* = (ti^2)
Transformed Equation definition: y*=k*x*= ax*
CURVE-FIT TABLE FOR TRANSFORMED EQUATION
GOODNESS-OF-FIT CALCULATION FOR PREDICTIVE EQUATION
b) & d)
xi = xi
ti = yi
x*i
y*i
x*i y*i
x*i^2
t^i=y^i
t-bar=ybar
(ti-tbar)^2
t^i-tbar)^2
(ti - t^i)^2
12
0.47
12
0.2209
2.6508
144
0.46680474
0.3575
0.01265625
0.01194753
1.02097E-05
9
0.4
9
0.16
1.44
81
0.40426476
0.3575
0.00180625
0.00218694
1.81882E-05
6
0.33
6
0.1089
0.6534
36
0.3300808
0.3575
0.00075625
0.00075181
6.52835E-09
3
0.23
3
0.0529
0.1587
9
0.23340237
0.3575
0.01625625
0.01540022
1.15761E-05
Sums
30
1.43
30
0.5427
4.9029
270
1.43455268
1.43
0.031475
0.0302865
3.99806E-05
SST
SSE
SSR
The equation for best-fit value of slope y = ax is:
c) a = Sum(x*i y*i)/Sum(x*i^2)
a =
0.01815889
k = a=
0.01815889
e)
r^2 =(SSE)/(SSE+SSR)
0.99868166
r = sqrt(r^2)
0.99934061
r' = sqrt(1=r^2)
0.03630892
R^2 = 1-(SSR/SST)
0.99872977
Initial height, cm (
x
i
)
Time to bounce, s (
t
i
)
12
0.47
9
0.4
6
0.33
3
0.23
a)
Transformed Variable Definitions: x*= log(xi), y* = 2log(ti)
Transformed Equation Definition: y*= x* + b*
CURVE-FIT TABLE FOR TRANSFORMED EQUATION
GOODNESS-OF-FIT CALCULATION FOR PREDICTIVE EQUATION
b) & d)
xi = xi
ti = yi
x*i
y*i
x*i y*i
x*i^2
t^i=y^i
t-bar=ybar
(ti-tbar)^2
t^i-tbar)^2
(ti - t^i)^2
12
0.47
1.07918125
-0.6558043
-0.7077317
1.16463216
0.46462599
0.3575
0.01265625
0.01147598
2.888E-05
9
0.4
0.95424251
-0.79588
-0.7594625
0.91057877
0.40237791
0.3575
0.00180625
0.00201403
5.65445E-06
6
0.33
0.77815125
-0.9629721
-0.749338
0.60551937
0.32854019
0.3575
0.00075625
0.00083867
2.13106E-06
3
0.23
0.47712125
-1.2765443
-0.6090664
0.22764469
0.23231299
0.3575
0.01625625
0.01567179
5.34994E-06
Sums
30
1.43
3.28869626
-3.6912007
-2.8255986
2.90837499
1.42785707
1.43
0.031475
0.03000046
4.20155E-05
SST
SSE
SSR
The equation for best-fit value of slope y = 1x + b is:
c) b* = [ -1*Sum(x*i)+Sum(y*i) ]/N = log(k)
b*
-1.7449743
k = 10^b
0.01798978
e)
r^2 =(SSE)/(SSE+SSR)
0.99860146
r = sqrt(r^2)
0.99930049
r' = sqrt(1=r^2)
0.03739699
R^2 = 1-(SSR/SST)
0.99866512
Transformation D f) Return to the original non-linear equation and develop an expression for the optimum value of k
that minimizes the residuals of the non-linear model (Eq. 1). Your expression should involve only sums and products of the measured non-linear predictor response variables (࠵?
!
, ࠵?
!
)
What does your result indicate about the linearized approximation for the optimum value of k
? Although the original equation is non-linear, because it is simple and has only one free parameter, we may attempt to determine a best-fit equation for ‘
k
’ by minimizing the sum-of-squares of the residual using the non-linear expression. Initial height, cm (
x
i
)
Time to bounce, s (
t
i
)
12
0.47
9
0.4
6
0.33
3
0.23
a)
x*= ln(xi), y* = 2ln(ti)
y*=1x* + b*
CURVE-FIT TABLE FOR TRANSFORMED EQUATION
GOODNESS-OF-FIT CALCULATION FOR PREDICTIVE EQUATION
b) & d)
xi = xi
ti = yi
x*i
y*i
x*i y*i
x*i^2
t^i=y^i
t-bar=ybar
(ti-tbar)^2
t^i-tbar)^2
(ti - t^i)^2
12
0.47
2.48490665
-1.5100452
-3.7523213
6.17476106
0.46462599
0.3575
0.01265625
0.01147598
2.888E-05
9
0.4
2.19722458
-1.8325815
-4.026593
4.82779584
0.40237791
0.3575
0.00180625
0.00201403
5.65445E-06
6
0.33
1.79175947
-2.2173252
-3.9729135
3.210402
0.32854019
0.3575
0.00075625
0.00083867
2.13106E-06
3
0.23
1.09861229
-2.9393519
-3.2292082
1.20694896
0.23231299
0.3575
0.01625625
0.01567179
5.34994E-06
Sums
30
1.43
7.57250299
-8.4993038
-14.981036
15.4199079
1.42785707
1.43
0.031475
0.03000046
4.20155E-05
SST
SSE
SSR
The equation for best-fit value of slope y = 1x + b is:
c) b* = [ -1*Sum(x*i)+Sum(y*i) ]/N = log(k)
b*
-4.0179517
k = e^b
0.01798978
e)
r^2 =(SSE)/(SSE+SSR)
0.99860146
r = sqrt(r^2)
0.99930049
r' = sqrt(1=r^2)
0.03739699
R^2 = 1-(SSR/SST)
0.99866512
Problem #2:
A student wants to determine the rate of radioactive decay of an isotope by measuring the radioactivity, R
, once per hour over a three-hour period. The radioactivity is modeled as: Eq. 2) ࠵? = ࠵?
&
࠵?
’ (
⁄
where ࠵?
is the time constant of decay (hours). The measurements are (
assume all values are known to five significant digits regardless of rounding
): t (hours) Radioactivity (emissions/ns) 0 13.8 1 7.9
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
2 6.1 3 3.5 or 2.9 a) Define modified predictor/response variables (࠵?
!
∗
, ࠵?
!
∗
)
so that you can use a linear regression technique to determine the ‘best-fit’ values of t
and R
o
. Write the linearized equation using the modified predictor/response variables. This equation is converted to linear by taking natural logarithm of both sides: ࠵?࠵?(࠵?) = ࠵?࠵?<࠵?
&
࠵?
’ (
⁄
=
࠵?࠵?(࠵?) = ࠵?࠵?(࠵?
&
) +
࠵?
࠵?
>
Defining the transform variables as: ࠵?
∗
= ࠵?࠵?(࠵?),
࠵?
∗
= ࠵?
The transformed equation is: ࠵?
∗
= ࠵?࠵?
∗
+ ࠵?,
࠵? =
1
࠵?
>
,
࠵? = ࠵?࠵?(࠵?
&
)
Because the transformed equation is that of a line with both slope and intercept as free parameters, we can use the standard best-fit equations for both the slope and intercept. b) Create a new data table that includes columns for the original data, columns for the modified predictor/response variables, and columns for products of predictor/response variables needed to perform a linear regression using the modified variables. c) Calculate the best-fit value of t
and R
o
from the linear regression of the modified variables (note that your regression calculation should be consistent with the linearized equation you state in part a). d) Using the value of k
found in part c and Eq. 1, calculate: the sum-of-squares of the residuals (
SSR
or S
2
r
), explained square variance (
SSE
, or S
2
e
), total square variance (
SST
, or S
2
t
) e) Calculate the correlation coefficient, r (note that ࠵? = √࠵?
#
), the adjusted correlation coefficient, r’
(
࠵?
%
= √1 − ࠵?
#
), the coefficient of determination, R
2 As in problem #1, the best approach to solving the transformed equation and presenting goodness-of-fit is a spreadsheet calculation. Since the last data point R(3) = 3.5 or 2.9,
both cases are solved:
Case A, R(3) = 3.5 Case B, R(3) = 2.9
t (hours)
Radioactivit
y (emissions/
ns)
0
13.8
1
7.9
2
6.1
3
3.5
a)
Transformed variable definitions: x*= ti, y* = ln(Ri)
Transformed equation definitions: y* = m*x* + b*, m* = 1/Tau, b*=ln(Ro)
CURVE-FIT TABLE FOR TRANSFORMED EQUATION
GOODNESS-OF-FIT CALCULATION FOR PREDICTIVE EQUATION
b) & d)
ti
Ri
x*i
y*i
x*i y*i
x*i^2
R^i=y^i
R-bar=y-bar
(Ri-Rbar)^2
R^i-Rbar)^2
(Ri - R^i)^2
0
13.8
0
2.62466859
0
0
13.3870712
7.825
35.700625
30.9366355
0.17051023
1
7.9
1
2.06686276
2.06686276
1
8.64395572
7.825
0.005625
0.67068847
0.55347011
2
6.1
2
1.80828877
3.61657754
4
5.58135305
7.825
2.975625
5.03395162
0.26899465
3
3.5
3
1.25276297
3.75828891
9
3.60384793
7.825
18.705625
17.8181248
0.01078439
Sums
6
31.3
6
7.75258309
9.44172921
14
31.2162279
31.3
57.3875
54.4594004
1.00375939
SST
SSE
SSR
c) m* = Slope, b*=intercept: the best-fit equations for slope and intercept are:
m* = -0.4374291
b*=
2.5942894
Tau
-2.2860848
Ro
13.3870712
e)
r^2 =(SSE)/(SSE+SSR)
0.98190223
r = sqrt(r^2)
0.9909098
r' = sqrt(1=r^2)
0.13452794
R^2 = 1-(SSR/SST)
0.98250909
t (hours)
Radioactivit
y (emissions/
ns)
0
13.8
1
7.9
2
6.1
3
2.9
a)
Transformed variable definitions: x*= ti, y* = ln(Ri)
Transformed equation definitions: y* = m*x* + b*, m* = 1/Tau, b*=ln(Ro)
CURVE-FIT TABLE FOR TRANSFORMED EQUATION
GOODNESS-OF-FIT CALCULATION FOR PREDICTIVE EQUATION
b) & d)
ti
Ri
x*i
y*i
x*i y*i
x*i^2
R^i=y^i
R-bar=y-bar
(Ri-Rbar)^2
R^i-Rbar)^2
(Ri - R^i)^2
0
13.8
0
2.62466859
0
0
13.900153
7.675
37.515625
38.75253
0.01003063
1
7.9
1
2.06686276
2.06686276
1
8.48292307
7.675
0.050625
0.6527397
0.33979931
2
6.1
2
1.80828877
3.61657754
4
5.17692027
7.675
2.480625
6.24040233
0.85207619
3
2.9
3
1.06471074
3.19413221
9
3.1593477
7.675
22.800625
20.3911157
0.06726123
Sums
6
30.7
6
7.56453086
8.87757251
14
30.7193441
30.7
62.8475
66.0367877
1.26916735
SST
SSE
SSR
c) m* = Slope, b*=intercept: the best-fit equations for slope and intercept are:
m* = -0.4938448
b*=
2.63189985
Tau
-2.0249279
Ro
13.900153
e)
r^2 =(SSE)/(SSE+SSR)
0.98114331
r = sqrt(r^2)
0.99052679
r' = sqrt(1=r^2)
0.13731965
R^2 = 1-(SSR/SST)
0.9798056
Problem #3:
Using any software or calculation method (you do not need to show your work), determine the best-fit values for a linear equation for the data sets in problems 1 and 2. Eq 3.) ࠵? = ࠵?࠵? + ࠵?
a) What are the best-fit ‘m’ and ‘b’ values for the data set in problem 1? b) Using the linear model equation, calculate the correlation coefficient, r (note that ࠵? = √࠵?
#
), the adjusted correlation coefficient, r’
(
࠵?
%
= √1 − ࠵?
#
), the coefficient of determination, R
2 c) Compare the results of part b) with part e) in problem #1. What does the comparison tell you? We can use another spreadsheet calculation to compute the slope and intercept values for problem #1, and to re-calculate the goodness-of-fit using Eq. 3 as the predictive equation. Problem #1- Linear Predictive Equation Initial height, cm (
x
i
)
Time to bounce, s (
t
i
)
12
0.47
9
0.4
6
0.33
3
0.23
Transformed variables: x*= xi, y* = ti
Linear Equation: y =mx + b
CURVE-FIT TABLE FOR TRANSFORMED EQUATION
GOODNESS-OF-FIT CALCULATION FOR PREDICTIVE EQUATION
xi = xi
ti = yi
x*i
y*i
x*i y*i
x*i^2
t^i=y^i
t-bar=ybar
(ti-tbar)^2
t^i-tbar)^2
(ti - t^i)^2
12
0.47
12
0.47
5.64
144
0.476
0.3575
0.01265625
0.01404225
3.6E-05
9
0.4
9
0.4
3.6
81
0.397
0.3575
0.00180625
0.00156025
9E-06
6
0.33
6
0.33
1.98
36
0.318
0.3575
0.00075625
0.00156025
0.000144
3
0.23
3
0.23
0.69
9
0.239
0.3575
0.01625625
0.01404225
8.1E-05
Sums
30
1.43
30
1.43
11.91
270
1.43
1.43
0.031475
0.031205
0.00027
SST
SSE
SSR
a)
Using Excel built-in functions for slope and intercept:
m =
0.02633333
b =
0.16
b)
r^2 =(SSE)/(SSE+SSR)
0.99142176
r = sqrt(r^2)
0.99570164
r' = sqrt(1-r^2)
0.09261877
R^2 = 1-(SSR/SST)
0.99142176
c)
Comparing with the non-linear equations of part 1, only r' shows that the non-linear fit clearly better (0.035 for non-linear vs 0.093 for linear)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
d) Repeat parts a-c for the data set of problem #2. Repeating a-c for problem #2, both data sets: t (hours)
Radioactivit
y (emissions/
ns)
0
13.8
1
7.9
2
6.1
3
3.5
Transformed variable definitions: x*= ti, y* = Ri
Linear Equation: y =mx + b
CURVE-FIT TABLE FOR TRANSFORMED EQUATION
GOODNESS-OF-FIT CALCULATION FOR PREDICTIVE EQUATION
ti
Ri
x*i
y*i
x*i y*i
x*i^2
R^i=y^i
R-bar=y-bar
(Ri-Rbar)^2
R^i-Rbar)^2
(Ri - R^i)^2
0
13.8
0
13.8
0
0
12.73
7.825
35.700625
24.059025
1.1449
1
7.9
1
7.9
7.9
1
9.46
7.825
0.005625
2.673225
2.4336
2
6.1
2
6.1
12.2
4
6.19
7.825
2.975625
2.673225
0.0081
3
3.5
3
3.5
10.5
9
2.92
7.825
18.705625
24.059025
0.3364
Sums
6
31.3
6
31.3
30.6
14
31.3
31.3
57.3875
53.4645
3.923
SST
SSE
SSR
a)
Using Excel built-in functions for slope and intercept:
m=
-3.27
b=
12.73
b)
r^2 =(SSE)/(SSE+SSR)
0.93164017
r = sqrt(r^2)
0.96521509
r' = sqrt(1=r^2)
0.26145714
R^2 = 1-(SSR/SST)
0.93164017
c)
In this case, all three goodness-of-fit metrics show advantage of the exponential fit to the data compared to the linear fit
t (hours)
Radioactivit
y (emissions/
ns)
0
13.8
1
7.9
2
6.1
3
2.9
Transformed variable definitions: x*= ti, y* = Ri
Linear Equation: y =mx + b
CURVE-FIT TABLE FOR TRANSFORMED EQUATION
GOODNESS-OF-FIT CALCULATION FOR PREDICTIVE EQUATION
ti
Ri
x*i
y*i
x*i y*i
x*i^2
R^i=y^i
R-bar=y-bar
(Ri-Rbar)^2
R^i-Rbar)^2
(Ri - R^i)^2
0
13.8
0
13.8
0
0
12.85
7.675
37.515625
26.780625
0.9025
1
7.9
1
7.9
7.9
1
9.4
7.675
0.050625
2.975625
2.25
2
6.1
2
6.1
12.2
4
5.95
7.675
2.480625
2.975625
0.0225
3
2.9
3
2.9
8.7
9
2.5
7.675
22.800625
26.780625
0.16
Sums
6
30.7
6
30.7
28.8
14
30.7
30.7
62.8475
59.5125
3.335
SST
SSE
SSR
a)
Using Excel built-in functions for slope and intercept:
m=
-3.45
b=
12.85
b)
r^2 =(SSE)/(SSE+SSR)
0.94693504
r = sqrt(r^2)
0.97310587
r' = sqrt(1=r^2)
0.23035833
R^2 = 1-(SSR/SST)
0.94693504
c)
In this case, all three goodness-of-fit metrics show advantage of the exponential fit to the data compared to the linear fit
Problem #4:
Consider the attached datasheet for temperature sensor devices: a type-T Thermocouple
, a platinum wire RTD,
and a model #44004 semi-conductor Thermistor. Based on the data tables alone, determine: a) The units
of the sensitivity (
S
) value for all three sensors. Note the input is
temperature
for all three sensors. The definition of sensitivity is: ࠵? =
࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?
࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?
, ࠵?࠵? ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?
∆࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?
∆࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?
By inspection of the values and units of the data sheets, we identify the output/inputs and sensitivity for all three thermos-electric sensors as: Input Output Sensitivity Thermocouple T Voltage mV/C RTD T Resistance Ohms/C Thermistor T Resistance Ohms/C b) The value of the sensitivity when the input temperature is 0 °
C for all three sensors. Sensitivity can be approximated by: D
(OUTPUT)/
D
T At 0 °C, we can consider small change from 0 to 1 °C: D
(OUTPUT) = {Output at 1 °C - Output at 0 °C} D
T = {1 °C - 0 °C} = 1 °C Output 0 C Output 1 C D(OUTPUT) Sensitivity Thermocouple (mV) 0.000 0.039 0.039 0.039 mV/C RTD (ohms) 100 100.39 0.390 0.390 Ohms/C Thermistor (ohms) 7355 6989 -366 -366 Ohms/C c) The value of the sensitivity when the input temperature is 20 °
C for all three sensors.
Using same procedure as part b) at 20 °
C, Output 20 C Output 21 C D(OUTPUT) Sensitivity Thermocouple (mV) 0.790 0.830 0.040 0.040 mV/C RTD (ohms) 107.79 108.18 0.390 0.390 Ohms/C Thermistor (ohms) 2814 2690 -124 -124 Ohms/C d) Based on the results of b and c, what is the linearity of each sensor over the range of temperature from 0 to 20 °
C? Linearity is expressed as a % deviation of the actual response to an ideal linear response. We can use the sensitivity (slope of input/output curve) value at 0 °
C to estimate the expected response at 20 °
C. We then compute the difference (error) between the expected output to the actual output at 20 °
C. The linearity is the fraction of the error relative to the expected change in output
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Computing expected and actual responses for all three sensors: Output 20C Pred Out 20C DOUT, act DOUT, pred Difference % Linearity Thermocouple (mV) 0.790 0.780 0.790 0.780 0.010 1.28% RTD (ohms) 107.79 107.80 7.79 7.80 -0.01 0.13% Thermistor (ohms) 2814 35 -4541 -7320 2779 37.96% e) What resolution of the electrical measurement is needed so that temperature resolution will be 0.1 °C at 0 °C for each sensor? The electrical resolution required can be computed by multiply sensitivity and required temperature resolution: ࠵?(࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?) = ࠵? ∙ ࠵?࠵?
For each sensor, the results are: dT in C Sensitivity @ 0C Resolution Thermocouple (mV) 0.1 0.039 0.0039 mV RTD (ohms) 0.1 0.390 0.039 ohms Thermistor (ohms) 0.1 -366 36.6 ohms f) What resolution of the electrical measurement is needed so that temperature resolution will be 0.1 °C at 20 °C for each sensor? Similarly at 20 °C, dT in C Sensitivity @ 0C Resolution Thermocouple (mV) 0.1 0.040 0.0040 mV RTD (ohms) 0.1 0.390 0.039 ohms Thermistor (ohms) 0.1 -124 12.4 ohms