GSJ W13 eng150_document_Explanatory Synthesis
doc
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Brigham Young University, Idaho *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
150
Subject
English
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
doc
Pages
8
Uploaded by CaptainParrotMaster237
1
Modern Education VS Traditional Education
Gibrilla Saidu Jalloh
Bachelor of Science in Applied Business Management
Brigham Young University - Idaho
COURSE ENG: 150
Stephen Gibson
12/09/2023
2
Modern Education VS Traditional Education
While traditional education emphasizes structured classroom settings and established curricula, modern education embraces innovative approaches, incorporating technology and personalized learning, redefining the landscape of educational methodologies to meet the evolving needs of students in the contemporary world. Education, a perennial cornerstone of societal progress, stands at the crossroads of tradition and innovation. The age-old debate between modern and traditional education models persists, each advocating for its unique merits. Education has been a constant force shaping human development, adapting to the needs and challenges of each era. Traditional education, rooted in centuries-old practices, emphasizes the teacher as the central figure, imparting knowledge through lectures and rote memorization. Modern education, on the other hand, leverages technology, collaborative learning, and student-centric approaches to foster critical thinking and adaptability. The historical context of education is a tapestry woven with threads of
tradition and threads of progress. Andrews (1940) reflects on the historical dichotomy, shedding light on the timeless principles of traditional education. Hirsch (1997) contributes to this discourse by positing the idea that traditional education is, in fact, more progressive. On the other hand, Allen and McCullough (1980) and Theinner detail (2021) weigh in on the transformative impact of technology in shaping modern education.
Modern education stands out for its integration of technology, offering an array of resources that transcend traditional classroom boundaries. The advent of computers, the internet,
and e-learning platforms has transformed the learning landscape. Virtual classrooms, multimedia
presentations, and interactive simulations engage students in ways unimaginable to previous
3
generations. The modern learner has access to an abundance of information, fostering self-
directed exploration and learning. Allen and McCullough (1980) delve into the transformative role of technology in education. The advent of computers, the internet, and e-learning platforms has ushered in a new era of learning possibilities. The ability to access information instantaneously and engage in collaborative, virtual spaces has revolutionized modern education.
However, Theinnerdetail (2021) raises concerns about the potential drawbacks, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach. One of the strengths of modern education lies in its ability to cater
to individual learning styles. Adaptive learning platforms, personalized lesson plans, and differentiated instruction acknowledge the diverse needs of students. Tailoring education to individual strengths and weaknesses enhances student engagement and promotes a deeper understanding of concepts. While modern education brings forth numerous advantages, it is not without challenges. The digital divide, potential for distraction, and concerns about the authenticity of online information are critical issues. Balancing technological integration with a focus on personal development and interpersonal skills becomes paramount for the efficacy of modern education.
Hirsch (1997) argues that traditional education, with its emphasis on foundational knowledge, provides a robust framework for intellectual growth. The structured curriculum, disciplined environment, and teacher-centric approach, according to Hirsch, equip students with the analytical tools necessary for problem-solving. The enduring strengths of traditional education, rooted in time-tested methods, remain a guiding light amid the winds of change. Theinnerdetail (2021) outlines the pros and cons of both traditional and modern education. The traditional approach is praised for its emphasis on discipline, foundational knowledge, and
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
teacher-student interaction. Meanwhile, modern education is lauded for its adaptability, individualized learning experiences, and technological integration. Theinnerdetail acknowledges that both models have strengths and weaknesses, opening the door for a potential synthesis. Ismail Eleburuike (2022) brings a contemporary perspective, advocating for innovation in education. The SchoolTry Solution presented by Eleburuike highlights the need to bring innovation into both traditional and modern modes of teaching. This source underscores the dynamic nature of education, calling for a nuanced understanding that embraces the strengths of both approaches.
As we navigate the complex educational landscape, a synthesis of modern and traditional approaches emerges as a promising paradigm. Drawing inspiration from Andrews' historical insights, Hirsch's advocacy for foundational knowledge, and Eleburuike's call for innovation, a harmonious blend is conceivable. The integration of technology, while preserving the essence of traditional principles, paves the way for a holistic education that prepares students for the challenges of the 21st century.
In the grand tapestry of education, the interplay between tradition and innovation continues to shape the learning odyssey. Modern education, with its technological prowess, and traditional education, with its enduring strengths, need not be adversaries but rather collaborators. By synthesizing the wisdom of the past with the possibilities of the future, we can embark on a transformative journey that transcends the boundaries of convention. The synthesis of modern and traditional education is not merely an option; it is an imperative for nurturing a generation equipped to thrive in an ever-evolving world.
5
https://targetstudy.com/articles/traditional-education-vs-modern-education ANDREWS, C. F. (1940). Traditional vs. Modern. The Journal of Education, 123(9), 297-297.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/42876524 Allen, D. W., & McCullough, L. N. (1980). Education and Technology:
The ChangingBasics.Educational Technology, 20(1), 47-5
http://www.jstor.org/stable/44421459 Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1997). Why traditional education is more progressive? The AmericanEnterprise, 8(2), 42+.https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A19219491/AONE?
u=anon~6d8fb054&sid=googleScholar&xid=6866a637 Theinnerdetail. (2021). 'Traditional & Modern Education': Pros & Cons.
https://theinnerdetail.com/traditional-modern-education-pros-cons/ Ismail Eleburuike (2022). "Bringing Innovation to Education," The SchoolTry Solution,
https://www.schooltry.com/traditional-and-modern-mode-of-teaching/
6
References
(Note that the following references are intended as examples only. These entries illustrate different types of references but are not cited in the text of this template. In your paper, be sure every reference entry matches a citation in your paper and every citation refers to an item in the reference list.)
American Counseling Association. (n.d.). About us.
https://www.counseling.org/about-us/about-
aca
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
Anderson, M. (2018). Getting consistent with consequences. Educational Leadership, 76
(1), 26-
33.
Bach, D., & Blake, D. J. (2016). Frame or get framed: The critical role of issue framing in nonmarket management. California Management Review, 58
(3), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.3.66
Burgess, R. (2019). Rethinking global health: Frameworks of Power.
Routledge.
Herbst-Damm, K. L., & Kulik, J. A. (2005). Volunteer support, marital status, and the survival times of terminally ill patients. Health Psychology, 24
(2), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.2.225
Johnson, P. (2003). Art: A new history.
HarperCollins. https://doi.org/10.1037.0000136-000
Lindley, L. C., & Slayter, E. M. (2018). Prior trauma exposure and serious illness at end of life: A national study of children in the U.S. foster care system from 2005 to 2015. Journal of
Pain and Symptom Management, 56
(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.001
Osman, M. A. (2016, December 15). 5 do’s and don’ts for staying motivated.
Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/in-depth/5-dos-and-donts-for-
staying-motivated/art-20270835
Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2016). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice
(7th ed.). Wiley.
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Anatomy of a research article
[Video]. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instructionalmedia/tutorials#s-lg-box-
7955524
8
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Writing literature reviews in your graduate coursework
[Webinar]. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/graduate#s-lg-box-18447417
World Health Organization. (2018, March). Questions and answers on immunization and vaccine safety.
https://www.who.int/features/qa/84/en/