6.3 Assignment_ Annotated Bibliography
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Gaylord High School/voc. Bldg. *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
10A
Subject
Communications
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by CoachMagpiePerson636
Source 1: "The Arab Spring at Ten Years: What's the Legacy of the Uprisings?" Council on Foreign Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, 17 Dec. 2020, https://www.cfr.org/article/arab-spring-ten-years-whats-legacy-uprisings
Why should you pay attention to what he or she says?
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is a reputable think tank specializing in international affairs. The organization provides well-researched and informed analyses on global issues, making their insights on the Arab Spring valuable for understanding the geopolitical context and consequences of the uprisings.
What are the author’s main ideas?
The article discusses the impact of the Arab Spring on six hotspots: Bahrain, Egypt, Libya, Syria,
Tunisia, and Yemen. It highlights political, social, and economic changes, emphasizing protests for dignity and human rights, religious tensions, economic struggles, youth unemployment, press
freedom, displacement, internet freedom, corruption, and women's empowerment.
Does this source answer any of your research questions? If so, which ones?
This source provides information relevant to multiple research questions, including the impact of
political repression, economic inequalities, youth unemployment, and the role of social media in mobilization.
Who is the intended audience?
The intended audience for this source includes policymakers, scholars, and the general public interested in gaining a comprehensive understanding of the consequences of the Arab Spring in the Middle East.
Is there any indication of bias? How do you know this?
While CFR is generally considered unbiased, it's essential to consider potential perspectives. The
article presents a balanced overview, but it's advisable to cross-reference information with other sources to ensure a well-rounded understanding.
How does this source compare and contrast to your other sources, in terms of helpfulness?
This source complements academic research by providing a concise overview of the broader impact of the Arab Spring, including social, political, and economic dimensions. It serves as a valuable starting point for understanding the multifaceted consequences of the uprisings.
Source 2: "Arab Spring."Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 13 Sept.2017, https://www.britannica.com/event/Arab-Spring
Why should you pay attention to what he or she says?
The entry from Britannica is a reputable reference source known for its comprehensive and well-
researched articles. While the author is not explicitly mentioned, the information provided is likely compiled and reviewed by subject matter experts, ensuring accuracy and reliability.
What are the author’s main ideas?
The article provides a historical overview of the Arab Spring, highlighting the wave of pro-
democracy protests and uprisings that swept across the Middle East and North Africa in 2010 and 2011. It details key events in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Bahrain, Libya, and Syria, offering insights into the causes, outcomes, and subsequent developments in the region.
Does this source answer any of your research questions? If so, which ones?
This source offers foundational information for understanding the broader context of the Arab Spring, addressing the second and fifth research questions related to the main causes of uprisings
and the variations in outcomes across different countries.
Who is the intended audience?
The intended audience for this source is the general public, students, and researchers seeking a concise and informative overview of the Arab Spring. Its accessibility makes it suitable for a broad readership.
Is there any indication of bias? How do you know this?
Britannica is generally considered a reliable and unbiased source. In this article, I did not see any
bias.
How does this source compare and contrast to your other sources, in terms of helpfulness?
This source serves as a valuable starting point for gaining a comprehensive understanding of the Arab Spring, providing a concise summary of events and outcomes. It complements scholarly articles by offering a more accessible narrative for those seeking a broad overview of the topic.
Source 3: History.com Editors. "Arab Spring."History.com, A&E Television Networks, 10 Jan.2018, https://www.history.com/topics/middle-east/arab-spring
Why should you pay attention to what he or she says?
History.com is a reputable source for historical information, and its editorial team ensures accuracy and reliability in its content. The information provided in this source is likely to be well-researched and curated for a general audience.
What are the author’s main ideas?
The article outlines the origins, key events, and aftermath of the Arab Spring, emphasizing the interconnected nature of the protests across the Middle East and North Africa. It discusses the catalyst event, the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia, and tracks the developments in various countries, including Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Bahrain.
Does this source answer any of your research questions? If so, which ones?
This source provides essential background information on the Arab Spring, addressing the first and second research questions related to the origins and key events of the uprisings.
Who is the intended audience?
The intended audience for this source is the general public, students, and those seeking a concise overview of the Arab Spring. It is accessible and suitable for readers without extensive prior knowledge of the topic.
Is there any indication of bias? How do you know this?
History.com is generally considered a reliable and unbiased source. The article presents facts and
events without apparent bias, making it suitable for gaining a broad understanding of the Arab Spring.
How does this source compare and contrast to your other sources, in terms of helpfulness?
This source complements the other entries by providing a concise historical overview of the Arab
Spring. Its accessibility makes it a valuable introductory source for those seeking a general understanding of the events, and it aligns with the information presented in other scholarly and reference-based entries.
Source 4: Simon, Clea. "Ten Years Later: Was the Arab Spring a Failure?"Harvard Gazette,Harvard Gazette, 4 Feb. 2021, https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/02/ten-
years-later-was-the-arab-spring-a-failure/
.
Why should you pay attention to what he or she says?
Alvin Powell is a staff writer at the Harvard Gazette, and this article appears to draw on insights from Arab scholars and analysts at Harvard University. The information presented is likely to reflect academic perspectives and analyses.
What are the author’s main ideas?
The article discusses the Arab Spring, emphasizing that despite initial optimism, little substantial change is evident in many Middle Eastern countries. It highlights the ongoing struggle between governments and the people, comparing it to a chess game. The piece suggests that beneath the surface, there is an ongoing current of change, with examples such as protests in Algeria leading to a ban on fracking and contributing to political change.
Does this source answer any of your research questions? If so, which ones?
This source addresses the overarching question of whether anything has changed a decade after the Arab Spring. It provides insights into the ongoing dynamics in the region and suggests that change is occurring.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Who is the intended audience?
The intended audience includes readers interested in gaining insights into the long-term impact of the Arab Spring, with a focus on academic perspectives and analyses.
Is there any indication of bias? How do you know this?
The article presents a balanced view of the situation, acknowledging both the challenges and changes in the aftermath of the Arab Spring. The inclusion of quotes from Arab scholars and analysts adds credibility to the information presented.
How does this source compare and contrast to your other sources, in terms of helpfulness?
This source provides a nuanced view of the ongoing changes in the Middle East post-Arab Spring. It complements the information provided by other sources, offering insights into the long-term impact, the role of modernizing autocrats, and the potential for societal demands for greater voice and accountability.
Source 5: Staff, NPR. "The Arab Spring: A Year of Revolution."NPR, NPR, 17 Dec. 2011, https://www.npr.org/2011/12/17/143897126/the-arab-spring-a-year-of-revolution
.
Why should you pay attention to what he or she says?
Deborah Amos is a journalist known for her coverage of the Middle East. She has reported extensively on the Arab Spring and its aftermath. This article provides on-the-ground perspectives and insights into the state of the Arab world one year after the Arab Spring began.
What are the author’s main ideas?
The article reflects on the state of the Arab world one year after the Arab Spring began, with a focus on Tunisia and Egypt. It highlights the mixed success in Egypt and the challenges faced during the transitional period. The article also explores the rise of Islamist groups in the region and the implications for the future. The perspectives of activists, scholars, and analysts are presented to provide a comprehensive view of the ongoing developments.
Does this source answer any of your research questions? If so, which ones?
This source contributes to understanding the progress and challenges in the Arab world one year after the Arab Spring. It provides insights into the mixed success in Egypt, the role of Islamist groups, and the ongoing struggles for democracy.
Who is the intended audience?
The intended audience includes readers interested in gaining insights into the aftermath of the Arab Spring, with a focus on the experiences of Tunisia and Egypt. It appeals to those following developments in the Middle East and North Africa.
Is there any indication of bias? How do you know this?
The article presents a balanced view, incorporating perspectives from various stakeholders, including activists, analysts, and scholars. While it acknowledges challenges and setbacks, it also
explores the complexity of the situation and the diverse opinions within the region.
How does this source compare and contrast to your other sources, in terms of helpfulness?
This source provides a more narrative and on-the-ground perspective on the Arab Spring's aftermath, complementing the academic analyses in other sources. It offers a nuanced view of the
challenges and opportunities faced by different countries in the region.