1107LWK4RameshA (1)

docx

School

University of the Fraser Valley *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1107L

Subject

Chemistry

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by advikaramesh

Report
Introduction The market for dietary supplements has been growing exponentially as the desire for a fit, healthy body grows in society. However, the weight loss industry has become a 2.1-billion-dollar industry [1], and as a result of the money in the industry, has several products out with claims that it cannot satisfy [2]. This experiment tests the validity of several supplements’ claims: if they provide high levels of protein. The experiment aims to see if these supplements truly do contain as much protein as they claim, as well as seeing how much fillers, like sugar and starch, are inside of these supplements. This information will be able to inform fitness aficionados on which supplements are harming them versus helping them. The experiment was conducted inside of a lab at UGA, where qualitative analysis was used to test the validity of the supplements. Methods A test tube with 2.5 mL of water was filled with 0.5 mL of Lugol’s reagent. The test tube was covered with Parafilm and mixed until a yellowish-orange tint to the water was noticed to ensure that the negative control was set. A test tube filled with 2.5 mL of stock starch solution (0.1 g/L starch) had 0.5 mL of Lugol’s reagent added into it. The test tube was covered with Parafilm and mixed until a bluish-black tint to the water was noticed to ensure that the positive control was set. A test tube filled with 2.5 mL of Supplement #1 had 0.5 mL of Lugol’s reagent added into it. The test tube was covered with Parafilm and mixed until a color change was noticed and recorded. The process that Supplement #1 went through was then repeated with Supplement #2 and #3.
A test tube with 2.5 mL of water was filled with 0.5 mL of Benedict’s reagent. The test tube was covered with Parafilm, mixed and then heated up to 75°C for 5 minutes until a blue tint to the water was noticed to ensure that the negative control was set. A test tube filled with 2.5 mL of stock sugar solution (20 g/L glucose) had 0.5 mL of Benedict’s reagent added into it. The test tube was covered with Parafilm, mixed and then heated up to 75°C for 5 minutes until a reddish- brown tint to the water was noticed to ensure that the positive control was set. A test tube filled with 2.5 mL of Supplement #1 had 0.5 mL of Benedict’s reagent added into it. The test tube was covered with Parafilm, mixed and then heated up to 75°C for 5 minutes until a color change was noticed and recorded. The process that Supplement #1 went through was then repeated with Supplement #2 and #3. A test tube with 2.5 mL of water was filled with 1.0 mL of Biuret reagent. The test tube was covered with Parafilm and mixed until a blue tint to the water was noticed to ensure that the control was set. A test tube filled with 2.5 mL of stock protein solution (5 g/L albumin) had 1.0 mL of Biuret reagent added into it. The test tube was covered with Parafilm and mixed until a purple tint to the water was noticed to ensure that the positive control was set. A test tube filled with 2.5 mL of Supplement #1 had 1.0 mL of Biuret reagent added into it. The test tube was covered with Parafilm and mixed until a color change was noticed and recorded. The process that Supplement #1 went through was then repeated with Supplement #2 and #3.
Findings Figure 1: (Colorimetric assay with Benedict’s reagent) (In order: Negative Control, Positive Control, Supplement #1, Supplement #2, Supplement #3) Figure 2 (Colorimetric assay with Lugol’s reagent) (In order: Negative Control, Positive Control, Supplement #1, Supplement #2, Supplement #3)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Figure 3 (Colorimetric assay with Biuret’s reagent) (In order: Negative Control, Positive Control, Supplement #1, Supplement #2, Supplement #3) These were the findings of our study. The photos of Benedict’s reagent test, Lugol’s reagent test, and Biuret reagent test, respectively, are displayed above. For the Benedict’s test, the light blue indicates that there is little to no sugar; the darker that the red is, the more sugar that is present. These results indicate that all of the supplements have some amount of sugar in it. Supplement #2 had much less sugar than Supplement #1, and Supplement #1 had less sugar than Supplement #3. In the Lugol’s test, a yellowish-orange color indicates a lack of starch, whereas the darker the color is, the more starch there is in the solution. In terms of starch, all of the supplements seem to also contain some amounts of starch. However, it seems that Supplement #2 had less than Supplement #3, which had much less than Supplement #1. In the Biuret’s test, a light blue indicates the absence of protein, where a darker blue represents more protein. The results for protein seemed to marginally indicate that Supplement #3 did not have any protein. In terms of the supplements that did, supplement #1 had the least, while Supplement #2 had the most.
Discussion/Conclusion Because Supplement #2 had the least amount of starch and sugar while having the most protein, Supplement #2 would be the one that the fitness club should recommend to its constituents. Supplement #1 also seems to come close in terms of having a similar amount of protein as well as a little less sugar. As a best-case scenario, the experiment looks for no sugar or starch, but all of these supplements contain sugar and starch as fillers. With the parameters that the supplement should have no fillers, all of these supplements fail. Works Cited 1. Arace of results. Nutr Bus J 2016;21:1, 3-7. 2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Tainted Weight I.oss Products. 2017.