Lab#4Cworksheet
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Salt Lake Community College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2010
Subject
Chemistry
Date
Jun 1, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by bryanmeza0610
Name: Bryan Meza
Lab #4C: Newton’s 3
rd
Law
Objectives:
By examining the graphs that these sensors will produce, we will employ two force sensors in this lab to test Newton's Third Law. The direction of the link between force pairs and the variance of force pairs will be observed. We will be able to comprehend and express Newton's Third Law in straightforward terms by the end of the experiment. Equipment:
Station #: 5
Partner: Kennadee Anderson
, rating: #5/5
Computer
LabQuest Mini Interface
Logger Pro
Two Vernier Force Sensors
1 or 2 N calibration weight
String
Elastic
Preliminary Questions:
#1: Because the force the bug exerts on the windshield is equal to the force the windshield exerts on the bug, it would be neither, according to Newton's Third Law. They have the same magnitude but face the opposite way.
#2: The rubber band is pulling on my right hand with some power. My left hand pulls on the rubber band, while my right hand pulls in the opposite direction.
#3: My right hand increases the force it is applying.
#4: My right hand pulls in the opposite direction with the same force as my left hand when I apply pulling pressure to my left
hand using a rubber band.
Procedure:
Using two force sensors that will graph the forces applied to them, we are testing Newton's Third Law in this lab. In order to graph the data on Logger Pro, we first had to set up everything, including the LabQuest Mini and two force sensors. We had to calibrate the sensors in Logger Pro once we had it connected and functioning properly. To test whether Newton's Third Law is true, we began graphing by pulling each sensor with a string and a rubber band.
Step #9:
String
Rubber Band Prediction
Rubber Band
Analysis:
#1:
The Third Law of Newton states that although the magnitude of the forces will be equal, the directions of the reaction forces will be in opposition to one another.
#2:
In the case of a rubber band, the tension will decrease as the band lengthens. The reaction forces, however, will remain constant and move in the opposite direction.
#3:
No, when we pull on each other's force sensors, the sensors do not all point in the same positive direction. The manufacturer specifies the positive direction of each force, which is typically the direction in which the force sensor is most sensitive. My force sensor's positive direction in this situation. is toward my partner, and the force in my partner's favor is moving in my way. As a result, the force sensor on my partner's body will register a positive force when I pull on it, whereas the sensor on his body will measure a negative force. Since two forces are acting in opposition to one another, this affects how the force pair is analyzed.
#4:
My partner and I may pull together while they held their sensor firmly in place on the table.
#5:
The expression "forces A and B are equal and opposite" denotes that the forces' intensities are equal and that their directions are opposite. Their sign points in the wrong way. Due to their equal magnitude and opposing direction, the forces actually cancel each other out.
According to Newton's third rule, there are always two forces operating on the objects involved in an interaction. The magnitude of the forces acting on the first and second objects are equal.
#6:
The bug and and windshield is zero since they cancel out according to Newton’s Third Law. Extensions: (extra credit)
#1:
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
#2: Conclusion:
In this lab, the forces were measured and examined using two Vernier force sensors. To find out if Newton's Third Law is accurate, we conducted this experiment. Both the time variation and the directional relationship of the force pairs have to be monitored. I would contend that our graphs demonstrate that we were effective in attaining our objectives. The graphs show that even if each sensor is tugging on the others, the magnitude of this pulling cancels out. I found that if two things are acting on each other, the force's strength will be zero regardless of the mass of the objects. I now have a better understanding of how Newton's Third Law works thanks to this experiment. My initial predictions turned out to be very accurate. One possible flaw that might have happened is the sensors' lack of calibration. Only once, during the
first test, did we calibrate it. They might not be very accurate as a result. I would make sure that the sensors were calibrated for the future experiment because there is a possibility that they weren't.
Related Documents
Related Questions
2. Assuming that all groups carried out the experiment and associated calculations
correctly, which would you expect to agree better with the known value of AH
any one group's average value or the entire class' average value? Explain.
fur
arrow_forward
1. The table below shows average temperatures recorded over a five-day period last winter
(a) Calculate the mean values, X, of these temperatures
(b) Calculate the standard deviation of the average temperatures . Clearly show all your calculations
(c) Find confidence interval at 90% and 99%
Days
Temperature (°C)
21
2
23
17
25
12
6.
19
arrow_forward
please answer #10
arrow_forward
For my lab I had to find the unknown concentration of a solution. I found wavelength max of the potassium chromate. Then used that max to find the absorbtion for my sample dilutions. Based on my attached graph. Is my unknown concentration # making sense? Or did I make an error with the absorbance I wrote down in the lab. I did my calculations when I got home. They are correct, but my unknown concentration amount doesn't look like it will even be on the graph. Or am I wrong. Please advise and explain. Thank you
arrow_forward
Calculate the linear momentum of a pickup truck that has a mass of 915 kg and is traveling eastward at 22 m/s. kg · m/s
arrow_forward
Please help
arrow_forward
Please help
arrow_forward
An essential part of the experimental design process is to select appropriate dependent and
independent variables.
True
False
arrow_forward
This question has multiple parts. Work all the parts to get the most points.
A solution of a dye was analyzed by spectrophotometry, and the following calibration data were collected.
Dye Concentration Absorbance (A) at 475 nm
0.50 x 10 M
0.24
9.
1.5 x 10 M
0.36
2.5 x 10 M
3.5 x 10 M
4.5 x 10 M
0.44
0.59
0.70
a Construct a calibration plot, and determine the slope and intercept.
Slope =
y-intercept =
arrow_forward
A protein’s concentration can be determined spectrophotometrically by mixing it with an indicator called a Bradford reagent and measuring the amount of light absorbed by the protein. Use the plot below to determine the mass of protein (in micrograms, μμg ) in 100.0 mL of the solution if its absorbance is 0.398.
A. 52
B. 3.1
C. 2.4
D. 0.52
E. 0.031
arrow_forward
Consider the following sets of replicate measurements:
(1) Calculate the mean and standard deviation of Group A.
(2) Determine the confidence interval at 95% confidence level. Assume the data here are the only knowledge you have and no previous measurements are available.
arrow_forward
Please don't provide handwritten solution .....
arrow_forward
1-37. A proton and a negatively charged u meson (called a muon)can form a short-lived species
called a mesonic atom. The charge of a muon is the same as that on an electron and the mass
of a muon is 207 me. Assume that the Bohr theory can be applied to such a mesonic atom
and calculate the ground-state energy, the radius of the first Bohr orbit, and the energy and
frequency associated with the n = 1 to n = 2 transition in a mesonic atom.
arrow_forward
Concentration
.020 M
.040 M
.080 M
.120 M
unknown
Transmittance
.695
.483
O
.233
.113
.316
Use the data above to answer the following questions. Estimate the concentration of the unknown
based on the data given.
Between .03 M and .05 M
Between .09 M and .100 M
Between .07 M and .09 M
Absorbance
.158
.316
.632
.948
.500
Between .05 M and .07 M
arrow_forward
5. | The biochemistry that takes place inside cells depends on
O various elements, such as sodium, potassium, and calcium, that
are dissolved in water as ions. These ions enter cells through nar-
row pores in the cell membrane known as ion channels. Each ion
channel, which is formed from a specialized protein molecule, is
selective for one type of ion. Measurements with microelectrodes
have shown that a 0.30-nm-diameter potassium ion (K+) channel
carries a current of 1.8 pA.
a. How many potassium ions pass through if the ion channel
opens for 1.0 ms?
b. What is the current density in the ion channel?
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you

Organic Chemistry: A Guided Inquiry
Chemistry
ISBN:9780618974122
Author:Andrei Straumanis
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Related Questions
- 2. Assuming that all groups carried out the experiment and associated calculations correctly, which would you expect to agree better with the known value of AH any one group's average value or the entire class' average value? Explain. furarrow_forward1. The table below shows average temperatures recorded over a five-day period last winter (a) Calculate the mean values, X, of these temperatures (b) Calculate the standard deviation of the average temperatures . Clearly show all your calculations (c) Find confidence interval at 90% and 99% Days Temperature (°C) 21 2 23 17 25 12 6. 19arrow_forwardplease answer #10arrow_forward
- For my lab I had to find the unknown concentration of a solution. I found wavelength max of the potassium chromate. Then used that max to find the absorbtion for my sample dilutions. Based on my attached graph. Is my unknown concentration # making sense? Or did I make an error with the absorbance I wrote down in the lab. I did my calculations when I got home. They are correct, but my unknown concentration amount doesn't look like it will even be on the graph. Or am I wrong. Please advise and explain. Thank youarrow_forwardCalculate the linear momentum of a pickup truck that has a mass of 915 kg and is traveling eastward at 22 m/s. kg · m/sarrow_forwardPlease helparrow_forward
- Please helparrow_forwardAn essential part of the experimental design process is to select appropriate dependent and independent variables. True Falsearrow_forwardThis question has multiple parts. Work all the parts to get the most points. A solution of a dye was analyzed by spectrophotometry, and the following calibration data were collected. Dye Concentration Absorbance (A) at 475 nm 0.50 x 10 M 0.24 9. 1.5 x 10 M 0.36 2.5 x 10 M 3.5 x 10 M 4.5 x 10 M 0.44 0.59 0.70 a Construct a calibration plot, and determine the slope and intercept. Slope = y-intercept =arrow_forward
- A protein’s concentration can be determined spectrophotometrically by mixing it with an indicator called a Bradford reagent and measuring the amount of light absorbed by the protein. Use the plot below to determine the mass of protein (in micrograms, μμg ) in 100.0 mL of the solution if its absorbance is 0.398. A. 52 B. 3.1 C. 2.4 D. 0.52 E. 0.031arrow_forwardConsider the following sets of replicate measurements: (1) Calculate the mean and standard deviation of Group A. (2) Determine the confidence interval at 95% confidence level. Assume the data here are the only knowledge you have and no previous measurements are available.arrow_forwardPlease don't provide handwritten solution .....arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Organic Chemistry: A Guided InquiryChemistryISBN:9780618974122Author:Andrei StraumanisPublisher:Cengage Learning

Organic Chemistry: A Guided Inquiry
Chemistry
ISBN:9780618974122
Author:Andrei Straumanis
Publisher:Cengage Learning
