Title_+A+Case+Study+Analysis+of+Jack%27s+Learning+Experience+at+Scanton+Industries

pdf

School

Mississippi State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

CCL8133

Subject

Business

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

5

Uploaded by CommodoreWildcatMaster664

Report
Jackson State University Title_ A Case Study Analysis of Jack's Learning Experience at Scanton Industries.docx Document Details Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240 Submission Date Nov 12, 2023, 9:45 PM CST Download Date Nov 13, 2023, 5:25 PM CST File Name Title_+A+Case+Study+Analysis+of+Jack%27s+Learning+Experience+at+Scanton+Industries.docx File Size 7.7 KB 3 Pages 446 Words 2,740 Characters Page 1 of 5 - Cover Page Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240 Page 1 of 5 - Cover Page Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240
How much of this submission has been generated by AI? 100% of qualifying text in this submission has been determined to be generated by AI. Caution: Percentage may not indicate academic misconduct. Review required. It is essential to understand the limitations of AI detection before making decisions about a student's work. We encourage you to learn more about Turnitin's AI detection capabilities before using the tool. Frequently Asked Questions What does the percentage mean? The percentage shown in the AI writing detection indicator and in the AI writing report is the amount of qualifying text within the submission that Turnitin's AI writing detection model determines was generated by AI. Our testing has found that there is a higher incidence of false positives when the percentage is less than 20. In order to reduce the likelihood of misinterpretation, the AI indicator will display an asterisk for percentages less than 20 to call attention to the fact that the score is less reliable. However, the final decision on whether any misconduct has occurred rests with the reviewer/instructor. They should use the percentage as a means to start a formative conversation with their student and/or use it to examine the submitted assignment in greater detail according to their school's policies. How does Turnitin's indicator address false positives? Our model only processes qualifying text in the form of long-form writing. Long-form writing means individual sentences contained in paragraphs that make up a longer piece of written work, such as an essay, a dissertation, or an article, etc. Qualifying text that has been determined to be AI-generated will be highlighted blue on the submission text. Non-qualifying text, such as bullet points, annotated bibliographies, etc., will not be processed and can create disparity between the submission highlights and the percentage shown. What does 'qualifying text' mean? Sometimes false positives (incorrectly flagging human-written text as AI-generated), can include lists without a lot of structural variation, text that literally repeats itself, or text that has been paraphrased without developing new ideas. If our indicator shows a higher amount of AI writing in such text, we advise you to take that into consideration when looking at the percentage indicated. In a longer document with a mix of authentic writing and AI generated text, it can be difficult to exactly determine where the AI writing begins and original writing ends, but our model should give you a reliable guide to start conversations with the submitting student. Disclaimer Our AI writing assessment is designed to help educators identify text that might be prepared by a generative AI tool. Our AI writing assessment may not always be accurate (it may misidentify both human and AI-generated text) so it should not be used as the sole basis for adverse actions against a student. It takes further scrutiny and human judgment in conjunction with an organization's application of its specific academic policies to determine whether any academic misconduct has occurred. Page 2 of 5 - AI Writing Overview Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240 Page 2 of 5 - AI Writing Overview Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240
Title: A Case Study Analysis of Jack's Learning Experience at Scanton Industries Introduction: Jack, a 43-year-old machinist with 23 years of experience at Scanton Industries, finds himself facing the challenge of adapting to new computerized machinery. The case study explores Jack's initial apprehensions, his experience in traditional and computer-based training, and the transformative impact of an unconventional training approach on his perspective. Background: Jack's anxiety about learning new skills stems from a perceived inadequacy in traditional academic settings. His unease intensifies as he anticipates the need to program machinery using computers. This challenge prompts the company to send him, along with 20 other trainees, to a local school for training. Traditional Classroom Setting: Upon entering the classroom, Jack is immediately reminded of his negative experiences in school. The atmosphere triggers memories of past failures and creates a sense of dread. The traditional teaching method, with a focus on lectures and information input, fails to engage Jack and his fellow trainees effectively. The fear of tests and the pressure to remember vast amounts of information further contribute to their anxiety. Page 3 of 5 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240 Page 3 of 5 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Unconventional Training: The narrative takes an unexpected turn when the training location is shifted to a local school due to a strike. The new trainer Doug, adopts a hands-on and interactive approach. Instead of bombarding trainees with theoretical knowledge, Doug immediately involves them in practical exercises. The training becomes a collaborative effort, with periodic mini-tests providing instant feedback and opportunities for additional support. Shift in Perception: training. The absence of traditional paper-and-pencil tests and the emphasis on behavioral assessments contribute to a more relaxed and engaging learning environment. The case study highlights Jack's shift in perception from viewing tests as stress-inducing to recognizing them as Comparative Analysis: A clear distinction emerges between the traditional and unconventional training methods. The traditional classroom setting, reminiscent of Jack's past negative experiences, fails to address the practical needs of the trainees. In contrast, the unconventional approach, focusing on hands-on experience and continuous feedback, proves to be more effective in preparing Jack for the new challenges posed by computerized machinery. Page 4 of 5 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240 Page 4 of 5 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240
Conclusion: Jack's journey from anxiety to certification exemplifies the transformative power of tailored training approaches. The case study demonstrates the importance of adapting training methods to the individual needs of employees, emphasizing practical applications over theoretical knowledge. Jack's positive experience serves as a valuable lesson for organizations seeking to facilitate smooth transitions in the face of technological advancements, ensuring that employees enthusiasm. Page 5 of 5 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240 Page 5 of 5 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::6119:285804240