ART-Discussion Forum Unit 5

docx

School

Northern Virginia Community College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

102

Subject

Arts Humanities

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by NOVA-FS

Report
Art that Communicates Governments and organisations frequently commissioned and hired Romantic and Neoclassical artists to spread propaganda to the general populace. While Romantic arts frequently emphasize a specific character or an idea and charge them with emotions to transmit their messages to the public, Neoclassical arts, like "the Oath of Horatti," typically promote virtues and principles. Since they elicit stronger emotions from the general public than Neoclassical arts do, I think Romantic arts are superior at communicating a message. Most likely, the crowd had more dramatic and powerful energy, which would have left longer-lasting impressions. Both Neoclassical and Romantic art were used as ways for governments, institutions and individuals to convey their messages. Which of these two styles do you think is better at getting a message across? How is that style effective? What characteristics help the viewer understand the intent of the image? One of these paintings, "Napoleon Bonaparte Visiting the Plague-Struck in Jaffa" by Gros, was used as propaganda to sway the people. Napoleon recognized the enormous potential in using the arts to
present himself to the public as a savior, much like some of the Roman emperors had done in the past. Napoleon is depicted in this artwork as a Christ-like figure, as evidenced by his erect posture and the bolder color choices used surrounding him. He is seen visiting his devoted subjects in a foreign makeshift hospital where death and plague are common (Harris & Zuker, n. d.). The picture did a good job of portraying Napoleon as the beloved savior in a number of ways, according to Harris and Zuker (n. d.). First, he adopts stances from traditional Greek art, which exudes assurance and compassion even in a remote and alien location. Second, in stark contrast to his companions, he was displaying no signs of terror in the face of death and plague. Finally, when they gazed at Napoleon in this horrible location, the faces of those sick troops shone with delight and optimism. All of these features of the image clearly imply that Napoleon was the compassionate, self-assured messiah who deserved our allegiance and adoration. References: Khan Academy. (n.d.). Gros, Napoleon Bonaparte Visiting the plague-stricken in Jaffa (video) . Khan Academy. Retrieved October 1, 2022, from https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/becoming-modern/romanticism/romanticism-in- france/v/gros-napoleon-bonaparte-visiting-the-pest-house-in-jaffa-1804
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help