Best Article

docx

School

Grand Canyon University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

PSY 260

Subject

Arts Humanities

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by HighnessFieldLark29

Best Article Brandy Grigson College of Humanities and Social Science, Grand Canyon University PSY 260: Introduction to Psychological Research and Ethics Dr. Justin Ienuso Novemember 26, 2023

Best Article Replicable Replicability is a fundamental aspect of scientific research, as it ensures that the findings of a study are reliable and can be trusted. When a study is replicated, it means that other researchers have conducted the same experiment or study and have obtained similar results (Morling, 2020). This is important because it allows for the validation of the original findings and helps to establish the robustness of the research. The study "Understanding When and Why People Give Others the Bigger Piece of the Pie" is a prime example of the importance of replicability in science. This study has been conducted by others in the past, and each time it has been replicated, the results have been consistent. This consistency provides strong evidence that the findings of the study are reliable and can be trusted (Shaw, Choshen-Hilel, & Caruso, 2016). The study is an extension of The Development of Inequity Aversion study, which aimed to understand how people respond to unequal distributions of resources. The new study builds on this research by exploring further scientific inquiries related to the subject matter. By replicating the original study and expanding on its findings, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms that drive human behavior. In conclusion, replicability is a crucial aspect of scientific research, and the study "Understanding When and Why People Give Others the Bigger Piece of the Pie" is a prime

example of its importance. By replicating and expanding on the original study, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of human behavior and establish the reliability of their findings. Generalization The current research is in the testing phase of various theories, and the results have shown promising accuracy within the selected population. The study prioritizes internal validity, which means that the focus is on ensuring internal consistency rather than external generalizability. The findings of this study have revealed that older children are more likely to endorse self-disadvantaging inequity compared to younger children. This means that older children are more willing to accept a situation where they receive less than others, as long as the distribution is fair (Shaw, Choshen-Hilel, & Caruso, 2016). Interestingly, the study also found that simply being generous is not enough to explain self-disadvantaging behavior. Even when older children had the opportunity to display generosity towards others, they refused to do so if it meant showing favoritism towards one person over another. This suggests that older children have a more complex understanding of fairness and equity, and they are willing to make sacrifices to maintain a sense of fairness (Shaw, Choshen-Hilel, & Caruso, 2016). Overall, the research has provided valuable insights into the development of fairness and equity in children. By prioritizing internal validity, the study has produced accurate findings that can inform future research and interventions in this area.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Importance The world of knowledge is vast and there are many areas that have yet to be fully explored. One such area that deserves our attention is the behavior of adults in the workplace. By delving deeper into this topic, we can gain valuable insights into their levels of empathy and reliability. Furthermore, conducting randomized assignments would enhance the credibility of our findings. This research is of utmost importance when compared to the second article, as it provides more valuable, dependable, and repeatable results.

References Shaw, A., Choshen-Hillel, S., & Caruso, E. M. (2016). The Development of Inequity Aversion: Understanding When (and Why) People Give Others the Bigger Piece of the Pie. Psychological Science (0956-7976) , 27 (10), 1352–1359. https://doi- org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0956797616660548 Morling, B. (2020). Research methods in psychology: Evaluating a world of information (4th ed.). Norton Publishing. ISBN-13: 978039389372

Best Article

Related Documents