A Pioneering Plea for Women's Suffrage
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Alexander College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
102
Subject
Arts Humanities
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by LieutenantCrownLeopard27
Title: Susan B. Anthony's Persuasive Rhetoric: A Pioneering Plea for Women's Suffrage
Introduction
Susan B. Anthony, a significant pioneer in the women's suffrage movement, delivered her famous speech,
"Women's Right to Vote," on March 8th, 1884 (Kratz). At a period when sexual orientation discrimination was
deeply embedded in American culture, Anthony's speech served as a powerful reinforcement of her steadfast
dedication to winning voting rights for women. Through a thorough explanatory study of her speech, I was able
to get insights into the strong strategies she employed, engaging in ethos, logos, and sensitivity to advance the
cause of women's suffrage.
Body
Anthony begins her speech by recognizing the historical context of her support, understanding the formidable
hurdles experienced by women in the nineteenth century (Kratz). This essential presentation establishes her
ethos, establishing herself as a knowledgeable and devoted champion for the cause. By identifying the
difficulties that women face, Anthony quickly builds a common understanding with her audience, laying the
groundwork for a powerful argument.
The appeal to logos could be an important part of Anthony's speech. She offers a clear and orderly case for
women's suffrage, emphasizing the typical anomalies in denying ladies the right to vote. Anthony skillfully
emphasizes that while women are expected to obey social standards and execute civic tasks, they are denied a
fundamental right of citizenship - the ability to vote. Anthony draws attention to the confusion of a majority rule
framework that restricts a crucial portion of its inhabitants by framing her argument in terms of tax collection
without representation (Kratz).
Anthony successfully employs extensive accent in her speech to underline the country's collective personality.
"It was we, the people, not we, the white male citizens, nor yet we, the male citizens, but we, the whole people,
who formed the Union" (Anthony). This purposeful use of inclusive language undermines the prevalent belief
that some segments of society were entitled to participate in the law-based plan. Anthony successfully broadens
the scope of her argument by appealing to all people' feeling of togetherness and shared duty.
Furthermore, Anthony's use of pathos may be a strong aspect in her rhetoric. She depicts the difficulties and
penances of women, shining light on the eager toll imposed by their disappointment. By humanizing the topic,
Anthony convinces her audience to identify with the plight of women, building an impassioned relationship that
strengthens her case. Her account of the efforts made by women in many fields, from nursing to teaching, serves
to highlight their competence and aptitude while dismantling prevalent prejudices and partialities (Kratz).
Consolidating coordinating citations from Anthony's speech is critical for expanding the inquiry. For example,
when she exclaims, "It is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty
while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican
government—the ballot," she exposes the stark inconsistency between the rhetoric of freedom and the reality of
women's disappointment. Such quotations capture the zeal and passion that characterized Anthony's support
(Kratz).
In addition to citations from Anthony's speech, experiences from reliable sources provide crucial verified
context and validation. "The History of Women's Suffrage," a significant work by Elizabeth Cady Stanton,
provides a fuller perspective on the problems and accomplishments of women's suffrage growth, strengthening
the study by placing Anthony's statements within a larger verifiable context ("History of Woman Suffrage").
Conclusion
Susan B. Anthony's "Women's Right to Vote" speech is a watershed moment in the history of women's suffrage.
A careful explanation investigation reveals that Anthony used a multifaceted method, masterfully integrating
ethos, logos, and emotion to construct an attractive case. Her crucial use of language and calls to communal
character and shared responsibility highlight the persistent influence of words in developing social decisions.
As we consider Anthony's comments, we are reminded of the transforming power of promotion based on a vote-
based system and consistency. Her speech not only advanced the cause of women's suffrage, but it also provided
the groundwork for subsequent generations of campaigners. Susan B. Anthony's legacy lives on as proof of the
power of appealing language in promoting societal change, pushing people to confront betrayal and strive for a
more comprehensive and evenhanded future.
REFERENCES
Kratz, Jessie. “Susan B. Anthony: Women’s Right to Vote.” Pieces of History, 5 Nov. 2019,
prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2019/11/05/susan-b-anthony-womens-right-to-vote/.
“History of Woman Suffrage, Volume I.” Gutenberg.org, 2017,
www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/28020/pg28020-
images.html
.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help