Examining the Complex Narratives of U.S. Immigration

Journal: Deconstructing Narratives

Deconstructing Narratives Question 1 The historical rhetoric within migration in the United States is frequently repurposed or reiterated. Discussions over the chemical makeup of the American population, the demands of the financial sector, and who counts as an American have gone on for decades. The fundamental tenets of racism, xenophobia, or nativism have not changed all through time, despite the fact that migration restrictionists' ideas and suggestions have. The experiences of previous immigrants influenced the views of subsequent generations toward those who are new, and similar discussions and conflicts continue to impact our current migration conflicts (Schrag, 2010). Since the country's creation, the idea that America is a "city atop a hill" and an exemplar of human perfection has proven to be an overarching concern. Similar concerns regarding the acceptance of other individuals, Question 2 The US's long tradition of immigration cherishes its wide foreign origins as well as recognizes foreigners' essential contributions to the country's monetary growth and prosperity. It recognizes how immigrants have an impact on American society, culture, and the economy, as well as the distinctiveness of the country (Schrag, 2010). The plot displays how different origins and ethnicities came together in America and how immigrants have made a good contribution. It tends to disregard the dark sides of the US's immigration history, such as racism, assault, and marginalization that many immigrant groups have encountered throughout time. The narrative systematically overlooks these heavier episodes, which especially can be explained by the plight of multiple immigrant populations. Question 3

The prevailing narrative of the immigration story in America is aimed at emphasizing the contributions that immigrants have brought to its finances, society, and society. That looks to pressure the thought that America addresses a blend of hidden different ethnic gatherings and societies as well as the assortment and painstakingness of this country's outsider legacy. Through this, this story looks to dissipate any negative biases and previously established inclinations about worker gatherings and convey a decent perspective on relocation (Schrag, 2010). It means to underline that settlers were pivotal to the development of the riches and thriving of the US of America and that it is a place that is known for potential open doors. There are impediments to this story also. It could diminish the obstacles and difficulties that workers have needed to go through in order to succeed in this country, yet frequently disregard the brutality, prohibition, and bias that numerous foreign gatherings have experienced throughout the long term. It might also understate the variety of points of view and perspectives that various immigrant groups hold, along with the complicated and varied experiences that those groups have had (Ryu & Tuvilla, 2018). Consequently, even if the most common account and immigration history aim to accomplish a lot of beneficial things, it is important to recognize its drawbacks while working toward a more thorough and nuanced knowledge of the course of emigration to America.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

References Ryu, Minjung, and Mavreen Rose S. Tuvilla. “Resettled Refugee Youths’ Stories of Migration, Schooling, and Future: Challenging Dominant Narratives about Refugees.” The Urban Review, vol. 50, no. 4, Mar. https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-018-0455-z Schrag, P. (2010). Not Fit for Our Society: Immigration and Nativism in America.

Journal - Deconstructing Narratives

Related Documents