Crew Parker Lab 1 Report
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of California, Irvine *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
107
Subject
Aerospace Engineering
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
9
Uploaded by DukeResolve213
MAE 107 Lab Report 1
Fall 2020
Crew Parker ID: 14186406
Instructor: Dr. Y. Wang
TA: Cody
Lab 1 Report
Summary
To perform this lab, a water pump was utilized with a water tank and manometer to
output a consistent mass flow rate of water out of a tube. Two different graduated cylinders, one
of 1000mL volume and another of 100mL volume, are used to measure how much water had
flowed from the tube. Four different combinations of graduated cylinder and mass flow rate are
measured in the same way. With a slower water flow rate and the 1000mL cylinder, the cylinder
is held under the stream of water until it reaches a predetermined volume. This volume is set to
500mL to speed up the lab, but any volume is acceptable if time is being measured, as mass flow
rate will be consistent independent of the final volume. One group member fills the cylinder to
500mL, while simultaneously holding a timer and timing when they begin and end filling the
cylinder. Another group member records the final volume and time of the trial. The volume is
calculated to the nearest 5mL by placing the cylinder on a flat surface and observing the
meniscus. This process is repeated 5 times for each member of the group, to attain better
accuracy of results. This sequence is then repeated with all group members for three more
combinations: 100mL cylinder with low flow rate, 1000mL cylinder with high flow rate, and
100mL cylinder with high flow rate. The results included very few outliers and matched our
calculations very closely (
see
Sample Calculations
)
. The average mass flow rates for the the
three cylinders were 33.05 mL/s for the low flow rate/large cylinder, 32.50 mL/s for the low flow
rate/small cylinder, and 55.29 mL/s for the high flow rate/large cylinder.
Crew Parker
1
MAE 107 Lab Report 1
Fall 2020
Questions
Q1.)
In the sample of experimental data, please estimate the precisions and range of each
equipment.
a.
The large graduated cylinder has a precision of 0.1mL and a range of 0 - 1000mL. The
small graduated cylinder has a precision of 0.01mL and a range of 0 - 50mL. The
stopwatch has a precision of 0.001 sec and a range of 0.00 - 359999.99 sec.
Q6.)
Plot the Rayleigh distributions for three means 1 m/s, 5 m/s, 10 m/s, respectively, using
Matlab or other programming languages, and attach the codes.
a.
See
Graphs.
Q8.)
What are the two categories of experimental errors? Please give examples using a ruler and
stopwatch.
a.
The two categories of experimental error are bias and uncertainty. Bias is essentially
where equipment or methods cause data to be skewed in a certain way. Uncertainty has to
do with the random variance associated with precision of data measurement. Bias with a
ruler may be the user observing the ruler from the wrong angle and skewing the data a
certain direction. Uncertainty with a stopwatch may occur if the number of digits the
watch can measure causes rounding to occur.
Q11.)
In a thermocouple, voltage (e) is measured to be 1 V. K= 300
o
C/V. δe=0.001 V, then δT=?
a.
See
Sample Calculations.
Q12.)
In Example 2, redo the calculation by using V=0.0955 liter and t = 1.08 sec.
a.
See
Sample Calculations.
Q13.)
In Example 3, add the extra data (3.1, 3.4, 3.2, 3.3) and redo the calculations.
a.
See
Sample Calculations.
Q2.)
Plot the frequency distributions of Q. Comment on the distributions: are there any outliers?
Please get rid of the outliers. Why are the distributions different?
a.
See
Graphs.
b.
The distributions did not change very much when the outliers were removed. They
essentially just become more similar to the expected probability distribution curve with
no outliers included.
Q3.)
Evaluate Equation 6 using the average values of t and V (without outliers) to determine the
predicted root-mean-square error δQ.
a.
See
Sample Calculations.
Q4.)
Compare the root-mean-square error δQ with the square root of the correct unbiased sample
variance, i.e. standard deviation S
Q
, and comment.
a.
The root-mean-square error of the low flow rate/large cylinder is 0.29 mL/s, the low flow
rate/small cylinder is 4.68 mL/s, and the high flow rate/large cylinder is 0.58 mL/s.
b.
The Standard deviation of the low flow rate/large cylinder is 0.75 mL/s, the low flow
rate/small cylinder is 4.03 mL/s, and the high flow rate/large cylinder is 1.89 mL/s.
Crew Parker
2
MAE 107 Lab Report 1
Fall 2020
c.
Overall these values are very similar with the exception of the high flow rate/large
cylinder values. These were the farthest apart, but otherwise they are quite close
relatively.
Tables
Q1.)
Sample of Experimental Data:
Crew Parker
3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
MAE 107 Lab Report 1
Fall 2020
Lab Data:
Crew Parker
4
MAE 107 Lab Report 1
Fall 2020
Graphs
Q6.)
MATLAB Rayleigh Distributions
Crew Parker
5
MAE 107 Lab Report 1
Fall 2020
Q6.)
Frequency Distribution Charts:
Crew Parker
6
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
MAE 107 Lab Report 1
Fall 2020
Sample Calculations
Q11.)
δT= K(δe) = (300 [
o
C/V])(0.001 [V]) =
0.3
o
C
Q12.)
=
= 0.01638
1
1.08
2
(0. 0005)
2
+
0.0955
2
1.08
4
(0. 2)
2
Q = 0.088 40 ± 0.0164 l/sec
Q13.)
3.25
𝑥
=
3.0+3.1+3.2+3.3+3.4+3.5
6
=
Crew Parker
7
MAE 107 Lab Report 1
Fall 2020
=
0.0292
σ
𝑥
2
=
1
6
𝑖=1
6
∑ (3. 0 − 3. 25)
2
s
x
2
=
0.035
=
1
6−1
𝑖=1
6
∑ (3. 0 − 3. 25)
2
Q3.)
δV = 5 mL, δt = 0.005 sec
a.
Low Flow Rate, Large Cylinder
V
avg
= 691.64 mL and t
avg
= 20.86 sec
δQ =
=
0.29 mL/sec
1
20.86
2
5
2
+
691.64
2
20.86
4
0. 005
2
b.
Low Flow Rate, Small Cylinder
V
avg
= 34.26 mL and t
avg
= 1.07 sec
δQ =
=
4.68 mL/sec
1
1.07
2
5
2
+
34.26
2
1.07
4
0. 005
2
c.
High Flow Rate, Large Cylinder
V
avg
= 537.17 mL and t
avg
= 9.72 sec
δQ =
=
0.58 mL/sec
1
9.72
2
5
2
+
537.17
2
9.72
4
0. 005
2
Crew Parker
8
MAE 107 Lab Report 1
Fall 2020
References
Wang, Yun. Practical Handbook of Thermal Fluid Science. Bentham Science Publisher, 2023.
Wang, Yun. Discussion “Lab 1 Q”. University of California, Irvine Canvas, 2023.
Crew Parker
9
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help