In an experiment to compare bearing strengths of pegs inserted in two different types of mounts, a sample of 14 observations on stress limit for red oak mounts resulted in a sample mean and sample standard deviation of 8.48 MPa and .79 MPa, respectively, whereas a sample of 12 observations when Douglas fir mounts were used gave a mean of 9.36 and a standard deviation of 1.52 (“Bearing Strength of White Oak Pegs in Red Oak and Douglas Fir Timbers,” J. of Testing and Evaluation, 1998, 109–114). Consider testing whether or not true average stress limits are identical for the two types of mounts. Compare df’s and P-values for the unpooled and pooled t tests.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 9 Solutions
Student Solutions Manual for Devore's Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, 9th
- The burning rates of two different solid-fuel propellants used in air crew escape systems are being studied. It is known that beth propellants have approximately the same standard deviation of burning rate; that is o, = 6, =3 centimeters per second. Two random samples of m, = 20 and M, = 20 specimens are tested; the sample mean burning rates are &, = 18 centimeters per second and &, = 24 centimeters per second. Use a = 0.10. Construct a 90% confidence interval on the difference in means.arrow_forwardA researcher compares two compounds (1 and 2) used in the manufacture of car tires that are designed to reduce braking distances for SUVs equipped with the tires. SUVs equipped with tires using compound 1 have a mean braking distance of 7777 feet and a standard deviation of 12.812.8 feet. SUVs equipped with tires using compound 2 have a mean braking distance of 8585 feet and a standard deviation of 5.35.3 feet. Suppose that a sample of 3333 braking tests are performed for each compound. Using these results, test the claim that the braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires using compound 1 is shorter than the braking distance when compound 2 is used. Let μ1μ1 be the true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 1 and μ2μ2 be the true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 2. Use the 0.10.1 level of significance. Step 1 of 4 : State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.arrow_forwardAn experiment was performed to compare the abrasive wear of two different laminatedmaterials. Twelve pieces of material 1 were tested by exposing each piece to a machine measuring wear.Ten pieces of material 2 were similarly tested. In each case, the depth of wear was observed. Thesamples of material 1 gave an average wear of 85 units with a sample standard deviation of 4, while thesamples of material 2 gave an average of 81 units and a sample standard deviation of 5. Can weconclude at the 0.05 level of significance that the abrasive wear of material 1 exceeds that of material 2by more than 2 units? Assume that the population to be approximately normal with potentially unequalvariances.arrow_forward
- Consider that an insurance actuary claims that the average footwell intrusions for small and medium cars is the same. Impact tests of 40 miles per hour were performed on 12 randomly selected small cars and 17 randomly selected medium cars. The average amount that the footwell bursts into the driver's legs has been measured. The average footwell intrusion in small cars was 10.1 cm with a standard deviation of 4.11 cm. For medium cars it was 8.3 cm with a standard deviation of 4.02 cm. Consider α = 0.10, and assume that the population variances are equal. Regarding the data presented, what decision making should be taken about the null hypothesis: We should: a) Reject the null hypothesis. b) Fail to Reject the Null Hypothesis.arrow_forwardAn experiment was performed to compare the abrasive wear of two different laminated materials. Twelve pieces of material 1 were tested by exposing each piece to a machine measuring wear. Ten pieces of material 2 were similarly tested. In each case, the depth of wear was observed. The samples of material 1 gave an average (coded) wear of 85 units with a sample standard deviation of 4, while the samples of material 2 gave an average of 81 with a sample standard deviation of 5. Can we conclude at the 0.05 level of significance that the abrasive wear of material 1 exceeds that of material 2 by more than 2 units? Assume the populations to be approximately normal with equal variances.arrow_forwardThe Edison Electric Institute has published figures on the number ofkilowatt hours used annually by various home appliances. It is claimed thata vacuum cleaner uses an average of 46 kilowatt hours per year. If arandom sample of 13 homes included in a planned study indicates thatvacuum cleaners use an average of 47 kilowatt hours per year with astandard deviation of 12.9 kilowatt hours, does this suggest at the 0.05level of significance that vacuum cleaners use, on average, greater than 46kilowatt hours annually? Assume the population of kilowatt hours to benormal.a. Solve using actual z or t value (whichever is applicable)b. Solve using p-valuearrow_forward
- The concentration of hexane (a common solvent) was measured in units of micrograms per liter for a simple random sample of nineteen specimens of untreated ground water taken near a municipal landfill. The sample mean was 289.2 with a sample standard deviation of 6.3. Twenty-two specimens of treated ground water had an average hexane concentration of 285.3 with a standard deviation of 7.6.It is reasonable to assume that both samples come from populations that are approximately normal. Can you conclude that the mean hexane concentration is less in treated water than in untreated water? Use the α = 0.10 level of significance. Use 6-step p-value method.arrow_forwarda) Soil has been improved to increase the strength of a ground. The average compressive strength of 61 samples before treatment is 45 kg / cm2 and the standard deviation is 6.75 kg / cm2; The average compressive strength of 56 samples after the improvement is 52.5 kg / cm2 and the standard deviation is 8 kg / cm2. Determine whether the improvement application changes the standard deviation of the soil strength or not at the 5% significance level .b) Find the confidence intervals at the 7% significance level of the mean compressive strength of the sample after improvement?arrow_forwardArsenic occurs naturally in some ground water and can be toxic. A mean arsenic level of μ=9μ=9 parts per billion (ppb) is considered safe for agricultural use. A well in San Bernardino County is used to water strawberry crops. This well is tested on a regular basis for arsenic. A random sample of 46 tests gave a sample mean of 8 ppb arsenic, with a sample standard deviation of 5.4 ppb. Does this information indicate that the mean level of arsenic in this well is different from μ=9μ=9 ppb? Use α=0.05α=0.05What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. H0:H0:? χ p σ μ Select an answer < ≠ > = ppbH1:H1:? σ p χ μ Select an answer ≠ > < = ppbWhat sampling distribution will you use? Explain the rationale for you choice of sampling distribution. The Student's t, since we have a simple random sample that is large and σσ is known. The Student's t, since we have a simple random sample that is large. The standard normal, since we have a simple random…arrow_forward
- the concentration of heaxane 0a common solvent) was measured in units of micrograms per liter for a simple random sample of ninteen specimens of untreated ground water taken near a municipal landfill. the sample mean was 508.4 with a sample standard deviation of 4.3. sixteen specimens of treated ground water had an average hexane concentration of 506.1. with a standard deviation of 4.7. it is responsable to assume that both sample come from populations that are approximately normal. can you conclude that the mean hexane concentration is less in treated water than in untreated water? use the α= 0.01 level of significance. A). yes B). Noarrow_forwardTwo subspecies of dark-eyed juncos were studied by D. Cristol et al. One of the subspecies migrates each year, and the other does not. Several characteristics of 14 birds of each subspecies were measured, one of which was wing length (in millimeters). The summaries of two samples are as follows: migratory subspecies has a sample mean wing length of 82.1 millimeters with standard deviation of 1.5 millimeters; non-migratory subspecies had a sample mean wing length of 84.92 millimeters with standard deviation of 1.69 millimeters. Assume that wing lengths in populations of subspecies are normally distributed. Conduct a hypothesis test to determine if there is a significant difference between mean wing lengths of the two subspecies. a. The appropriate hypotheses are b. Degree of freedom, test statistic and p-value are c. At the significance level calculated in part (b), we conclude that: i. The difference between mean wing lengths of the two subspecies is statistically significant ii. The…arrow_forwardIn a study of microplastics in our environment, it was determined that there are 5.25 trillion plastic pieces floating in the ocean, weighing more than 250,000 tons. In a recent expedition to examine whether increases in plastic production have led to changes in ocean microplastics, 16 samples were taken at various locations in the Pacific Ocean. It was determined that the average concentration was 9.5 particles per liter of ocean water with a sample standard deviation of 6. In one of the earliest research expeditions to study microplastics in the ocean conducted in 2009, it was determined that the average concentration of microplastics was 6 particles per liter (consider this the population or reference mean). What is the value of your test statistic? 0.5833 0.875 -0.875 2.333 -2.333 -0.5822arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman