(a)
Whether the confidence interval provides convincing evidence that the true
(a)
Answer to Problem 8E
There is no convincing evidence that the true mean weight is different than 17 grams.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
95% confidence interval for the true mean weight:
Note that
The confidence interval contains 17 grams.
This implies
It is likely that the true mean weight is 17 grams.
Thus,
This further implies
There is no convincing evidence that the true mean weight is different than 17 grams.
(b)
Whether the confidence interval provides convincing evidence that the true mean weight is 17 grams.
(b)
Answer to Problem 8E
Because of many other possible values for the true mean weight, there is no convincing evidence that the true mean weight is 17 grams.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
95% confidence interval for the true mean weight:
Note that
The confidence interval contains 17 grams.
This implies
It is likely that the true mean weight is 17 grams.
Moreover,
All weights between 16.945 grams and 17.395 grams are equally likely to be the true mean weight.
Thus,
It is not sure that the true mean weight is 17 grams.
This implies
We can’t say that there is any convincing evidence for the true mean weight is 17 grams.
Chapter 8 Solutions
PRACTICE OF STATISTICS F/AP EXAM
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
Algebra and Trigonometry (6th Edition)
Thinking Mathematically (6th Edition)
Intro Stats, Books a la Carte Edition (5th Edition)
Elementary Statistics
Precalculus
College Algebra (7th Edition)
- (c) Utilize Fubini's Theorem to demonstrate that E(X)= = (1- F(x))dx.arrow_forward(c) Describe the positive and negative parts of a random variable. How is the integral defined for a general random variable using these components?arrow_forward26. (a) Provide an example where X, X but E(X,) does not converge to E(X).arrow_forward
- (b) Demonstrate that if X and Y are independent, then it follows that E(XY) E(X)E(Y);arrow_forward(d) Under what conditions do we say that a random variable X is integrable, specifically when (i) X is a non-negative random variable and (ii) when X is a general random variable?arrow_forward29. State the Borel-Cantelli Lemmas without proof. What is the primary distinction between Lemma 1 and Lemma 2?arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman