Concept explainers
a.
Find the 95% confidence interval for the slope of Manganese.
a.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Answer to Problem 2E
The 95% confidence interval for the slope of Manganese is
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The data represents the MINITAB output of the regression model
Calculation:
Multiple linear regression model:
A multiple linear regression model is given as
The ‘Coefficient’ column of the regression analysis MINITAB output gives the slopes corresponding to the respective variables stored in the column ‘Predictor’.
Let
From the accompanying MINITAB output, the slope coefficient of Manganese is
Confidence interval:
The general formula for the confidence interval for the slope of the regression line is,
Where,
From the accompanying MINITAB output, the estimate of error standard deviation of slope coefficient of Manganese is
Critical value:
For 95% confidence level,
Degrees of freedom:
The number of plates that are sampled is
The degrees of freedom is,
From Table A.5 of the t- distribution in Appendix A, the critical value corresponding to the right tail area 0.025 and 17 degrees of freedom is 2.110.
Thus, the critical value is
The 95% confidence interval is,
Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the slope of Manganese is
Interpretation:
There is 95% confident that the average change in the tensile strength associated with 1 ppt increase in manganese lies between
b.
Find the 99% confidence interval for the slope of Thickness.
b.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Answer to Problem 2E
The 99% confidence interval for the slope of Thickness is
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
From the accompanying MINITAB output, the slope coefficient of Thickness is
Confidence interval:
The general formula for the confidence interval for the slope of the regression line is,
Where,
From the accompanying MINITAB output, the estimate of error standard deviation of slope coefficient of Thickness is
Critical value:
For 99% confidence level,
Degrees of freedom:
The number of plates that are sampled is
The degrees of freedom is,
From Table A.5 of the t- distribution in Appendix A, the critical value corresponding to the right tail area 0.005 and 17 degrees of freedom is 2.898.
Thus, the critical value is
The 95% confidence interval is,
Thus, the 99% confidence interval for the slope of Thickness is
Interpretation:
There is 99% confident that the average change in the tensile strength associated with 1 ppt increase in Thickness lies between
c.
Test whether there is enough evidence to conclude that
c.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Answer to Problem 2E
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
From the accompanying MINITAB output, the slope coefficient of Manganese is
Here, the claim is that
The test hypotheses are given below:
Null hypothesis:
That is, 1 ppt increase in manganese tends to at most
Alternative hypothesis:
That is, increase in the true average of tensile strength due to 1 ppt increase in manganese will be greater than
Test statistic:
The test statistic is,
Where,
From the accompanying MINITAB output, the estimate of error standard deviation of slope coefficient of Manganese is
Test statistic under null hypothesis:
Under the null hypothesis, the test statistic is obtained as follows:
Thus, the test statistic is 0.9642.
Degrees of freedom:
The number of plates that are sampled is
The degrees of freedom is,
Thus, the degree of freedom is 17.
Here, level of significance is not given.
So, the prior level of significance
P-value:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain the P- value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Probability Distribution Plot choose View Probability > OK.
- From Distribution, choose ‘t’ distribution and enter 17 as degrees of freedom.
- Click the Shaded Area tab.
- Choose X-Value and Right Tail for the region of the curve to shade.
- Enter the X-value as 0.9642.
- Click OK.
Output obtained from MINITAB is given below:
From the output, the P- value is 0.1742.
Thus, the P- value is 0.1742.
Decision criteria based on P-value approach:
If
If
Conclusion:
The P-value is 0.1742 and
Here, P-value is greater than the
That is
By the rejection rule, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Hence, 1 ppt increase in manganese tends to at most
Therefore, there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that
d.
Test whether there is enough evidence to conclude that
d.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Answer to Problem 2E
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
From the accompanying MINITAB output, the slope coefficient of Thickness is
Here, the claim is that
The test hypotheses are given below:
Null hypothesis:
That is, 1 mm increase in thickness tends to at least
Alternative hypothesis:
That is, decrease in the true average of tensile strength due to 1 mm increase in thickness will be less than
Test statistic:
The test statistic is,
Where,
From the accompanying MINITAB output, the estimate of error standard deviation of slope coefficient of Thickness is
Test statistic under null hypothesis:
Under the null hypothesis, the test statistic is obtained as follows:
Thus, the test statistic is -2.577.
Degrees of freedom:
The number of plates that are sampled is
The degrees of freedom is,
Thus, the degree of freedom is 17.
Here, level of significance is not given.
So, the prior level of significance
P-value:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain the P- value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Probability Distribution Plot choose View Probability > OK.
- From Distribution, choose ‘t’ distribution and enter 17 as degrees of freedom.
- Click the Shaded Area tab.
- Choose X-Value and Left Tail for the region of the curve to shade.
- Enter the X-value as -2.577.
- Click OK.
Output obtained from MINITAB is given below:
From the output, the P- value is 0.009795.
Thus, the P- value is 0.009795.
Decision criteria based on P-value approach:
If
If
Conclusion:
The P-value is 0.009795 and
Here, P-value is less than the
That is
By the rejection rule, reject the null hypothesis.
Hence, 1 mm increase in thickness tends to at least
Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
EBK STATISTICS FOR ENGINEERS AND SCIENT
- According to an economist from a financial company, the average expenditures on "furniture and household appliances" have been lower for households in the Montreal area than those in the Quebec region. A random sample of 14 households from the Montreal region and 16 households from the Quebec region was taken, providing the following data regarding expenditures in this economic sector. It is assumed that the data from each population are distributed normally. We are interested in knowing if the variances of the populations are equal. a) Perform the appropriate hypothesis test on two variances at a significance level of 1%. Include the following information: i. Hypothesis / Identification of populations ii. Critical F-value(s) iii. Decision rule iv. F-ratio value v. Decision and conclusion b) Based on the results obtained in a), is the hypothesis of equal variances for this socio-economic characteristic measured in these two populations upheld? c) Based on the results obtained in a),…arrow_forwardA major company in the Montreal area, offering a range of engineering services from project preparation to construction execution, and industrial project management, wants to ensure that the individuals who are responsible for project cost estimation and bid preparation demonstrate a certain uniformity in their estimates. The head of civil engineering and municipal services decided to structure an experimental plan to detect if there could be significant differences in project evaluation. Seven projects were selected, each of which had to be evaluated by each of the two estimators, with the order of the projects submitted being random. The obtained estimates are presented in the table below. a) Complete the table above by calculating: i. The differences (A-B) ii. The sum of the differences iii. The mean of the differences iv. The standard deviation of the differences b) What is the value of the t-statistic? c) What is the critical t-value for this test at a significance level of 1%?…arrow_forwardCompute the relative risk of falling for the two groups (did not stop walking vs. did stop). State/interpret your result verbally.arrow_forward
- Microsoft Excel include formulasarrow_forwardQuestion 1 The data shown in Table 1 are and R values for 24 samples of size n = 5 taken from a process producing bearings. The measurements are made on the inside diameter of the bearing, with only the last three decimals recorded (i.e., 34.5 should be 0.50345). Table 1: Bearing Diameter Data Sample Number I R Sample Number I R 1 34.5 3 13 35.4 8 2 34.2 4 14 34.0 6 3 31.6 4 15 37.1 5 4 31.5 4 16 34.9 7 5 35.0 5 17 33.5 4 6 34.1 6 18 31.7 3 7 32.6 4 19 34.0 8 8 33.8 3 20 35.1 9 34.8 7 21 33.7 2 10 33.6 8 22 32.8 1 11 31.9 3 23 33.5 3 12 38.6 9 24 34.2 2 (a) Set up and R charts on this process. Does the process seem to be in statistical control? If necessary, revise the trial control limits. [15 pts] (b) If specifications on this diameter are 0.5030±0.0010, find the percentage of nonconforming bearings pro- duced by this process. Assume that diameter is normally distributed. [10 pts] 1arrow_forward4. (5 pts) Conduct a chi-square contingency test (test of independence) to assess whether there is an association between the behavior of the elderly person (did not stop to talk, did stop to talk) and their likelihood of falling. Below, please state your null and alternative hypotheses, calculate your expected values and write them in the table, compute the test statistic, test the null by comparing your test statistic to the critical value in Table A (p. 713-714) of your textbook and/or estimating the P-value, and provide your conclusions in written form. Make sure to show your work. Did not stop walking to talk Stopped walking to talk Suffered a fall 12 11 Totals 23 Did not suffer a fall | 2 Totals 35 37 14 46 60 Tarrow_forward
- Question 2 Parts manufactured by an injection molding process are subjected to a compressive strength test. Twenty samples of five parts each are collected, and the compressive strengths (in psi) are shown in Table 2. Table 2: Strength Data for Question 2 Sample Number x1 x2 23 x4 x5 R 1 83.0 2 88.6 78.3 78.8 3 85.7 75.8 84.3 81.2 78.7 75.7 77.0 71.0 84.2 81.0 79.1 7.3 80.2 17.6 75.2 80.4 10.4 4 80.8 74.4 82.5 74.1 75.7 77.5 8.4 5 83.4 78.4 82.6 78.2 78.9 80.3 5.2 File Preview 6 75.3 79.9 87.3 89.7 81.8 82.8 14.5 7 74.5 78.0 80.8 73.4 79.7 77.3 7.4 8 79.2 84.4 81.5 86.0 74.5 81.1 11.4 9 80.5 86.2 76.2 64.1 80.2 81.4 9.9 10 75.7 75.2 71.1 82.1 74.3 75.7 10.9 11 80.0 81.5 78.4 73.8 78.1 78.4 7.7 12 80.6 81.8 79.3 73.8 81.7 79.4 8.0 13 82.7 81.3 79.1 82.0 79.5 80.9 3.6 14 79.2 74.9 78.6 77.7 75.3 77.1 4.3 15 85.5 82.1 82.8 73.4 71.7 79.1 13.8 16 78.8 79.6 80.2 79.1 80.8 79.7 2.0 17 82.1 78.2 18 84.5 76.9 75.5 83.5 81.2 19 79.0 77.8 20 84.5 73.1 78.2 82.1 79.2 81.1 7.6 81.2 84.4 81.6 80.8…arrow_forwardName: Lab Time: Quiz 7 & 8 (Take Home) - due Wednesday, Feb. 26 Contingency Analysis (Ch. 9) In lab 5, part 3, you will create a mosaic plot and conducted a chi-square contingency test to evaluate whether elderly patients who did not stop walking to talk (vs. those who did stop) were more likely to suffer a fall in the next six months. I have tabulated the data below. Answer the questions below. Please show your calculations on this or a separate sheet. Did not stop walking to talk Stopped walking to talk Totals Suffered a fall Did not suffer a fall Totals 12 11 23 2 35 37 14 14 46 60 Quiz 7: 1. (2 pts) Compute the odds of falling for each group. Compute the odds ratio for those who did not stop walking vs. those who did stop walking. Interpret your result verbally.arrow_forwardSolve please and thank you!arrow_forward
- 7. In a 2011 article, M. Radelet and G. Pierce reported a logistic prediction equation for the death penalty verdicts in North Carolina. Let Y denote whether a subject convicted of murder received the death penalty (1=yes), for the defendant's race h (h1, black; h = 2, white), victim's race i (i = 1, black; i = 2, white), and number of additional factors j (j = 0, 1, 2). For the model logit[P(Y = 1)] = a + ß₁₂ + By + B²², they reported = -5.26, D â BD = 0, BD = 0.17, BY = 0, BY = 0.91, B = 0, B = 2.02, B = 3.98. (a) Estimate the probability of receiving the death penalty for the group most likely to receive it. [4 pts] (b) If, instead, parameters used constraints 3D = BY = 35 = 0, report the esti- mates. [3 pts] h (c) If, instead, parameters used constraints Σ₁ = Σ₁ BY = Σ; B = 0, report the estimates. [3 pts] Hint the probabilities, odds and odds ratios do not change with constraints.arrow_forwardSolve please and thank you!arrow_forwardSolve please and thank you!arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillBig Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin HarcourtHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9e14/b9e141b888912793d57db61a53fa701d5defdb09" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af711/af7111c99977ff8ffecac4d71f474692077dfd4c" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ae58/9ae58d45ce2e430fbdbd90576f52102eefa7841e" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0445/b044547db96333d789eefbebceb5f3241eb2c484" alt="Text book image"