Direct materials and direct manufacturing labor variances. Rugged Life, Inc., designs and manufactures fleece quarter-zip jackets. It sells its jackets to brand-name outdoor outfitters in lots of one dozen. Rugged Life’s May 2017 static budget and actual results for direct inputs are as follows: Static Budget Number of jacket lots (1 lot = 1 dozen) 300 Per Lot of Jackets: Direct materials 18 yards at $4.65 per yard = $83.70 Direct manufacturing labor 2.4 hours at $12.50 per hour = $30.00 Actual Results Number of jacket lots sold 325 Total Direct Inputs: Direct materials 6,500 yards at $4.85 per yard = $31,525 Direct manufacturing labor 715 hours at $12.60 = $9,009 Rugged Life has a policy of analyzing all input variances when they add up to more than 8% of the total cost of materials and labor in the flexible budget, and this is true in May 2017. The production manager discusses the sources of the variances: “A new type of material was purchased in May. This led to faster cutting and sewing, but the workers used more material than usual as they learned to work with it. For now, the standards are fine.” 1. Calculate the direct materials and direct manufacturing labor price and efficiency variances in May 2017. What is the total flexible- budget variance for both inputs (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor) combined? What percentage is this variance of the total cost of direct materials and direct manufacturing labor in the flexible budget? 2. Comment on the May 2017 results. Would you continue the “experiment” of using the new material?
Direct materials and direct manufacturing labor variances. Rugged Life, Inc., designs and manufactures fleece quarter-zip jackets. It sells its jackets to brand-name outdoor outfitters in lots of one dozen. Rugged Life’s May 2017 static budget and actual results for direct inputs are as follows: Static Budget Number of jacket lots (1 lot = 1 dozen) 300 Per Lot of Jackets: Direct materials 18 yards at $4.65 per yard = $83.70 Direct manufacturing labor 2.4 hours at $12.50 per hour = $30.00 Actual Results Number of jacket lots sold 325 Total Direct Inputs: Direct materials 6,500 yards at $4.85 per yard = $31,525 Direct manufacturing labor 715 hours at $12.60 = $9,009 Rugged Life has a policy of analyzing all input variances when they add up to more than 8% of the total cost of materials and labor in the flexible budget, and this is true in May 2017. The production manager discusses the sources of the variances: “A new type of material was purchased in May. This led to faster cutting and sewing, but the workers used more material than usual as they learned to work with it. For now, the standards are fine.” 1. Calculate the direct materials and direct manufacturing labor price and efficiency variances in May 2017. What is the total flexible- budget variance for both inputs (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor) combined? What percentage is this variance of the total cost of direct materials and direct manufacturing labor in the flexible budget? 2. Comment on the May 2017 results. Would you continue the “experiment” of using the new material?
Solution Summary: The author explains the difference between the budgeted per unit cost of raw material and the actual per-unit cost, and direct labor efficiency variance.
Direct materials and direct manufacturing labor variances. Rugged Life, Inc., designs and manufactures fleece quarter-zip jackets. It sells its jackets to brand-name outdoor outfitters in lots of one dozen. Rugged Life’s May 2017 static budget and actual results for direct inputs are as follows:
Static Budget
Number of jacket lots (1 lot = 1 dozen)
300
Per Lot of Jackets:
Direct materials
18 yards at $4.65 per yard = $83.70
Direct manufacturing labor
2.4 hours at $12.50 per hour = $30.00
Actual Results
Number of jacket lots sold
325
Total Direct Inputs:
Direct materials
6,500 yards at $4.85 per yard = $31,525
Direct manufacturing labor
715 hours at $12.60 = $9,009
Rugged Life has a policy of analyzing all input variances when they add up to more than 8% of the total cost of materials and labor in the flexible budget, and this is true in May 2017. The production manager discusses the sources of the variances: “A new type of material was purchased in May. This led to faster cutting and sewing, but the workers used more material than usual as they learned to work with it. For now, the standards are fine.”
1. Calculate the direct materials and direct manufacturing labor price and efficiency variances in May 2017. What is the total flexible-budget variance for both inputs (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor) combined? What percentage is this variance of the total cost of direct materials and direct manufacturing labor in the flexible budget?
2. Comment on the May 2017 results. Would you continue the “experiment” of using the new material?
Definition Definition Measure used to estimate the difference between the budgeted and annual proportion for a specific accounting year. A favorable budget variance refers to positive variances or gains, while unfavorable or negative variances refer to a shortfall in the budget. A budget variance is indicative of the instances where the actual costs incurred are higher or lower than the estimated costs.
Year
0123
Cash Flow
-$ 19,000
11,300
10,200
6,700
a. What is the profitability index for the set of cash flows if the relevant discount rate is 11 percent?
Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 3 decimal places, e.g., 32.161.
b. What is the profitability index for the set of cash flows if the relevant discount rate is 16 percent?
Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 3 decimal places, e.g., 32.161.
c. What is the profitability index for the set of cash flows if the relevant discount rate is 23 percent?
Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 3 decimal places, e.g., 32.161.
a. Profitability index
b. Profitability index
c. Profitability index
Sol This question answer
Recently, Abercrombie & Fitch has been implementing a turnaround strategy since its sales had been falling for the past few years (11% decrease in 2014, 8% in 2015, and just 3% in 2016.) One part of Abercrombie's new strategy has been to abandon its logo-adorned merchandise, replacing it with a subtler look. Abercrombie wrote down $20.6 million of inventory, including logo-adorned merchandise, during the year ending January 30, 2016. Some of this inventory dated back to late 2013. The write-down was net of the amount it would be able to recover selling the inventory at a discount. The write-down is significant; Abercrombie's reported net income after this write-down was $35.6 million. Interestingly, Abercrombie excluded the inventory write-down from its non-GAAP income measures presented to investors; GAAP earnings were also included in the same report. Question: What is the impact on Abercrombie & Fitch's financial statements from the write-down of its logo-adorned merchandise…
Chapter 7 Solutions
Horngren's Cost Accounting, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Accounting with Pearson eText - Access Card Package (16th Edition)
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.