Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk. An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor. However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse. Characters in the case: Person E: The patient Person X: The employee of the hospital Doctor Nurse To discuss: The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

In Nathaniel Hawthorne's "The Birth-Mark," explore the theme of perfection and the consequences of pursuing physical flawlessness. Analyze the character of Aylmer, who seeks to remove his wife's birthmark in his quest for perfection, and draw parallels to contemporary society's fascination with plastic surgery and cosmetic procedures. Discuss how Aylmer's actions and motivations reflect modern ideals of beauty and the societal pressures to conform to an idealized standard. Consider the ethical implications of altering one's appearance to achieve perfection and the potential psychological and physical consequences. Reflect on the story's message about the nature of true beauty and the potential pitfalls of striving for an unattainable physical ideal. Your paper should be 1 page, double-spaced (250 words) and should draw connections between 'The Birth-Mark' and contemporary attitudes towards cosmetic procedures.

A child has been newly diagnosed with epilepsy and is prescribed phenytoin. 2.5mg/kg The child weighs 22.8kg What is the volume in millimetres to phenytoin 30mg/5ml suspension the child should receive for each dose ?

Do Nurses at your facility carry their own malpractice insurance? Are nursing students liable when performing duties? Please cite in text source and list references

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Answer 6

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Answer 7

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Answer 8

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Answer 9

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Answer 10

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Answer 11

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Answer 12

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 13

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 14

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 15

Ch. 7 - Prob. 1RP Ch. 7 - Prob. 2RP Ch. 7 - Prob. 3RP Ch. 7 - Prob. 4RP Ch. 7 - Prob. 5RP Ch. 7 - Prob. 1DCR Ch. 7 - Prob. 2DCR Ch. 7 - Prob. 3DCR Ch. 7 - Prob. 4DCR Ch. 7 - Prob. 5DCR

Concept explainers

Videos

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 7 Solutions