Engineering Economy, Student Value Edition (17th Edition)
17th Edition
ISBN: 9780134838137
Author: William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 6, Problem 80FE
For the following table, assume a MARR of 10% per year and a useful life for each alternative of six years that equals the study period. The rank-order of alternatives from least capital investment to greatest capital investment is Do Nothing
→ A → B → C → B.
Complete the
- a. Do Nothing
- b. Alternative A
- c. Alternative B
- d. Alternative C
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
This is the complete homework question.
Alternative A and B are two mutually exclusive cost alternatives, and one of them must be
selected. Using Incremental Analysis, which of the alternatives should be recommended based on
ERR (the External Rate of Return)? ·
MARR (Minimum acceptable rate of return) is 12% per year while the re-investment rate is
10% per year.
The study period is 20 years. Assume repeatability is appropriate for this comparison.
Alternative
A
B
$ (101,000)
$ (6,000)
20 years
$ (6,000)
$ (18,500 )
10 years
Initial capital investment
Annual operating expenses
Useful life
Salvage value
None
None
The following five alternatives that are evaluated by the rate of return method, If the alternatives are independent and the MARR is 15% per year, the onels) to select is (are)
Incremental ROR, N.
When Compared with
Alternative
Initial
Investment,S
Alternative
Alternative
A BC DE
10.6
27.3
194
353 25.0
-25,000
-35,000
13.1
38.5
24.4
-40,000
13.4
46.5
27.3
26.8
-60,000
25.4
-75,000
20.2
Only D
O Only D and E
O Only A D, and E
O Only E
Chapter 6 Solutions
Engineering Economy, Student Value Edition (17th Edition)
Ch. 6 - An oil refinery finds that it is necessary to...Ch. 6 - The Consolidated Oil Company must install...Ch. 6 - One of the mutually exclusive alternatives below...Ch. 6 - Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are...Ch. 6 - Prob. 5PCh. 6 - Prob. 6PCh. 6 - Fiesta Foundry is considering a new furnace that...Ch. 6 - Prob. 8PCh. 6 - DuPont claims that its synthetic composites will...Ch. 6 - Prob. 10P
Ch. 6 - Which alternative in the table below should be...Ch. 6 - Prob. 12PCh. 6 - The alternatives for an engineering project to...Ch. 6 - Prob. 14PCh. 6 - Prob. 15PCh. 6 - Prob. 16PCh. 6 - Refer to the situation in Problem 6-16. Most...Ch. 6 - An old, heavily used warehouse currently has an...Ch. 6 - Prob. 19PCh. 6 - Two electric motors (A and B) are being considered...Ch. 6 - Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are...Ch. 6 - Pamela recently moved to Celebration, Florida, an...Ch. 6 - Environmentally conscious companies are looking...Ch. 6 - Prob. 24PCh. 6 - Two 100 horsepower motors are being considered for...Ch. 6 - In the Rawhide Company (a leather products...Ch. 6 - Refer to Problem 6-2. Solve this problem using the...Ch. 6 - Prob. 28PCh. 6 - Prob. 29PCh. 6 - Two electric motors are being considered to drive...Ch. 6 - Prob. 31PCh. 6 - Prob. 32PCh. 6 - Prob. 33PCh. 6 - Potable water is in short supply in many...Ch. 6 - Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives...Ch. 6 - Prob. 36PCh. 6 - A companys MARR is 10% per year. Two mutually...Ch. 6 - Prob. 38PCh. 6 - a. Compare the probable part cost from Machine A...Ch. 6 - A one-mile section of a roadway in Florida has...Ch. 6 - Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being...Ch. 6 - Prob. 42PCh. 6 - IBM is considering an environmentally conscious...Ch. 6 - Three mutually exclusive earth-moving pieces of...Ch. 6 - A piece of production equipment is to be replaced...Ch. 6 - Prob. 46PCh. 6 - Prob. 47PCh. 6 - Prob. 48PCh. 6 - Prob. 49PCh. 6 - Prob. 50PCh. 6 - Prob. 51PCh. 6 - Prob. 52PCh. 6 - Prob. 53PCh. 6 - Use the imputed market value technique to...Ch. 6 - Prob. 55PCh. 6 - Prob. 56PCh. 6 - Prob. 57PCh. 6 - Prob. 58PCh. 6 - Prob. 59PCh. 6 - Prob. 60PCh. 6 - Prob. 61PCh. 6 - Prob. 62PCh. 6 - Prob. 63PCh. 6 - Prob. 64PCh. 6 - Prob. 65PCh. 6 - Prob. 66PCh. 6 - Three models of baseball bats will be manufactured...Ch. 6 - Refer to Example 6-3. Re-evaluate the recommended...Ch. 6 - Prob. 69SECh. 6 - Prob. 70SECh. 6 - Prob. 71SECh. 6 - Prob. 72CSCh. 6 - Prob. 73CSCh. 6 - Prob. 74CSCh. 6 - Prob. 75FECh. 6 - Prob. 76FECh. 6 - Prob. 77FECh. 6 - Complete the following analysis of cost...Ch. 6 - Prob. 79FECh. 6 - For the following table, assume a MARR of 10% per...Ch. 6 - Prob. 81FECh. 6 - Problems 6-82 through 6-85. (6.4) Table P6-82 Data...Ch. 6 - Prob. 83FECh. 6 - Problems 6-82 through 6-85. (6.4) Table P6-82 Data...Ch. 6 - Problems 6-82 through 6-85. (6.4) Table P6-82 Data...Ch. 6 - Consider the mutually exclusive alternatives given...Ch. 6 - Prob. 87FE
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Three mutually exclusive electric-vehicle battery systems are being investigated by a large automobile manufacturer. Pertinent data are given below: Solve, a. Use the PW method to select the best battery system. The MARR is 15% per year, and the system chosen must provide service for 10 years. Assume repeatability. b. Confirm your recommendation in Part (a) using the IRR method.arrow_forwardIf the IRR of Alternative A is 10%, the IRR of Alternative B is 8% and the MARR is 6%, which of the following is true? OAlternative B is preferred over Alternative A Alternative A is preferred over Alternative B Both alternatives are preferred over the do nothing alternative Both b and c are truearrow_forwardQuestions: A.) Future worth of Alternative A, B, C & D B.) Using the future worth method, which Alternative should be chosen? C.) Annual worth of Alternative A, B, C, & D D.) Using Annual worth method, which alternative should be chosen?arrow_forward
- An industrial coal-fired boiler for process steam is equipped with a 10-year-old electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Changes in coal quality have caused stack emissions to be in noncompliance with federal standards for particulates. Two mutually exclusive alternatives have been proposed to rectify this problem (doing nothing is not an option). The MARR is 9% per year. Make a recommendation regarding which alternative to select. 3. An industrial coal-fired boiler for process steam is equipped with a 10-year-old electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Changes in coal quality have caused stack emissions to be in noncompliance with federal standards for particulates. Two mutually exclusive alternatives have been proposed to rectify this problem (doing nothing is not an option). Capital investment Annual operating expenses Useful Life New Baghouse $1,140,000 $115,500 10 years New ESP $992,500 $73,200 10 years The MARR is 9% per year. Make a recommendation regarding which alternative to select.arrow_forwardAs supervisor of a facilities engineering department, you consider mobile cranes to be critical equipment. The purchase of a new, medium-sized truck-mounted crane is being evaluated. The economic estimates for the two best alternatives are shown in the following table. MARR is at 15% per year. You can use the assumption of repeatability in this case. Show that the same selection is made for the following methods:a. RORAI method b. AWC method c. PW methodarrow_forwardVidhi is investing in some rental property in Collegeville and is investigating her income from the investment. She knows the rental revenue will increase each year, but so will the maintenance expenses. She has been able to generate the data that follows regarding this investment opportunity. Assume that all cash flows occur at the end of each year and that the purchase and sale of this property are not relevant to the study. • If Vidhi's MARR = 6% per year, is this investment a profitable undertaking? Use Future Worth method! Year Revenue Year Expenses 1 $6,000 1 $3,100 2 6,200 2 3,300 6,300 3 3,500 6,400 4 3,700 6,500 5 3,900 6,600 6 6,100 6,700 7 4,300 6,800 8 4,500 6,900 4,700 7,000 4,900 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 10arrow_forward
- Fiesta Foundry is considering a new furnace that will allow them to be more productive. Three alternative furnaces are under consideration. Perform an incremental analysis of these alternatives using the IRR method for each increment of cash flows. The MARR is 14% per year.arrow_forwardurgent i will 10 upvotesarrow_forwardThe PW-based relation for the incremental cash flow series to find A/* between the lower first-cost alternative X and alternative Y has been developed. 0=-38,000+9000(P/A‚¡ *,10) + (-2000(P/F,Ai*,10)) Determine the highest MARR value for which Y is preferred over X. Any MARR value less than % favors Y.arrow_forward
- Advanced Modular Technology (AMT) makes energy cleaner, safer, more secure and more efficient. It typically exhibits net annual revenues that increase over a fairly long period. In the long run, an AMT project may be profitable as measured by IRR, but its simple payback period may be unacceptable. Evaluate this AMT project using the IRR method when the company MARR is 13% per year and its maximum allowable payback period is two years. What is your recommendation? $98,000 $2,000 + Capital investment at time 0 Net revenues in year k $10,000 • (k- 1) $9,000 Market (salvage) value Life 4 yearsarrow_forwardThe ROR analysis evaluates the increments between two alternatives in pairwise comparisons. Select one: O a. True Ob. Falsearrow_forwardFour mutually exclusive alternatives are being evaluated, and their costs and revenues are itemized in the Table. If the MARR 15%per year and the analysis period is 12 years, use the PW method to determine PW1, PW2, PW3, PW4, and which one of those four is the best alternative ?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Break Even Analysis (BEP); Author: Tutorials Point (India) Ltd.;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOEkc3O_Q_Y;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
Cost Volume Profit Analysis (CVP): calculating the Break Even Point; Author: Edspira;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nw2IioaF6Lc;License: Standard Youtube License