(a) A car traveling due east strikes a car traveling due north at an intersection, and the two move together as a unit. A property owner on the southeast corner of the intersection claims that his fence was torn down in the collision. Should he be awarded damages by the insurance company? Defend your answer, (b) Let the eastward-moving car have a mass of 1.30 ×10 3 -kg and a speed of 30.0 km/h and the northward-moving car a mass of 1.10 × 10 3 -kg and a speed of 20.0 km/h. Find the velocity after the collision. Are the results consistent with your answer to part (a)?
(a) A car traveling due east strikes a car traveling due north at an intersection, and the two move together as a unit. A property owner on the southeast corner of the intersection claims that his fence was torn down in the collision. Should he be awarded damages by the insurance company? Defend your answer, (b) Let the eastward-moving car have a mass of 1.30 ×10 3 -kg and a speed of 30.0 km/h and the northward-moving car a mass of 1.10 × 10 3 -kg and a speed of 20.0 km/h. Find the velocity after the collision. Are the results consistent with your answer to part (a)?
Solution Summary: The author concludes that the claim of the property owner for award of damage by the insurance company should be denied.
(a) A car traveling due east strikes a car traveling due north at an intersection, and the two move together as a unit. A property owner on the southeast corner of the intersection claims that his fence was torn down in the collision. Should he be awarded damages by the insurance company? Defend your answer, (b) Let the eastward-moving car have a mass of 1.30 ×103-kg and a speed of 30.0 km/h and the northward-moving car a mass of 1.10 × 103-kg and a speed of 20.0 km/h. Find the velocity after the collision. Are the results consistent with your answer to part (a)?
(a) A car traveling due east strikes a car traveling due north at an intersection, and the two move together as a unit. A property owner on the southeast corner of the intersection claims that his fence was torn down in the collision. Should he be awarded
damages by the insurance company? Defend your answer.
(b) Let the eastward-moving car have a mass of 1,350 kg and a speed of 30.0 km/h and the northward-moving car a mass of 1,100 kg and a speed of 19.5 km/h. Find the velocity after the collision. Are the results consistent with your answer to part (a)?
magnitude
km/h
direction
o north of east
(a) A car traveling due east strikes a car traveling due north at an intersection, and the two move together as a unit. A property owner on the southeast corner of the intersection claims that his fence was torn down in the collision. Should he be awarded damages by the insurance company? Defend your answer. (b) Let the eastward-moving car have a mass of 1 300 kg and a speed of 30.0 km/h and the northward-moving car a mass of 1 100 kg and a speed of 20.0 km/h. Find the velocity after the collision. Are the results consistent with your answer to part (a)?
(a) A car traveling due east strikes a car traveling duenorth at an intersection, and the two move together as a unit.A property owner on the southeast corner of the intersectionclaims that his fence was torn down in the collision. Should hebe awarded damages by the insurance company? Defend youranswer. (b) Let the eastward-moving car have a mass of 1.30 x103-kg and a speed of 30.0 km/h and the northward-movingcar a mass of 1.10 x 103-kg and a speed of 20.0 km/h. Findthe velocity after the collision. Are the results consistent withyour answer to part (a)?
Glencoe Physics: Principles and Problems, Student Edition
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.