a)
Interpretation:Effect onnumber of moles of
Concept introduction: In accordance to Le Chatelier’s principle, change in reaction condition brings changes in position of equilibrium and shifts equilibrium in that direction that tends to decrease the change. It states that on addition of reactant or product in a reaction, shifts the equilibrium in the direction of decreasing the added amount. Whereas on removal of reactant or product in reaction, shifts the equilibrium in the direction of increasing the amount removed.
b)
Interpretation:Effect onnumber of moles of
Concept introduction: In accordance to Le Chatelier’s principle, change in reaction condition brings changes in position of equilibrium and shifts equilibrium in that direction that tends to decrease the change. It states that on addition of reactant or product in a reaction, shifts the equilibrium in the direction of decreasing the added amount. Whereas on removal of reactant or product in reaction, shifts the equilibrium in the direction of increasing the amount removed.
c)
Interpretation: Effect on number of moles of
Concept introduction: In accordance to Le Chatelier’s principle change in reaction condition brings changes in position of equilibrium and shifts equilibrium in that direction that tends to decrease the change.
d)
Interpretation: Effect onnumber of moles of
Concept introduction: In accordance to Le Chatelier’s principle change in reaction condition brings changes in position of equilibrium and shifts equilibrium in that direction that tends to decrease the change. It states that for an endothermic reaction increase in temperature tends to shift equilibrium in forward direction and for exothermic reaction it shifts in backward direction.
e)
Interpretation:Effect onnumber of moles of
Concept introduction: In accordance to Le Chatelier’s principle, change in reaction condition brings changes in position of equilibrium and shifts equilibrium in that direction that tends to decrease the change. It states that on addition of reactant or product in a reaction, shifts the equilibrium in the direction of decreasing the added amount. Whereas on removal of reactant or product in reaction, shifts the equilibrium in the direction of increasing the amount removed.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 6 Solutions
EBK CHEMICAL PRINCIPLES
- A gaseous material XY(g) dissociates to some extent to produce X(g) and Y(g): XY(g)X(g)+Y(g) A 2.00-g sample of XY (molar mass = 165 g/mol) is placed in a container with a movable piston at 25C. The pressure is held constant at 0.967 atm. As XY begins to dissociate, the piston moves until 35.0 mole percent of the original XY has dissociated and then remains at a constant position. Assuming ideal behavior, calculate the density of the gas in the container after the piston has stopped moving, and determine the value of K for this reaction of 25C.arrow_forwardThe experiment in Exercise 12.33 was redesigned so that the reaction started with 0.15 mol each of N2 and O2 being injected into a 1.0-L container at 2500 K. The equilibrium constant at 2500 K is 3.6 X 10“’. What was the composition of the reaction mixture after equilibrium was attained? The following reaction establishes equilibrium at 2000 K: N2(g) + O2(g) *2 2 NO K = 4.1 X IO-4 If the reaction began with 0.100 mol L-1 of N2 and 0.100 mol L-’ ofO2, what were the equilibrium concentrations of all species?arrow_forwardWhat is the law of mass action? Is it true that the value of K depends on the amounts of reactants and products mixed together initially? Explain. Is it true that reactions with large equilibrium constant values are very fast? Explain. There is only one value of the equilibrium constant for a particular system at a particular temperature, but there is an infinite number of equilibrium positions. Explain.arrow_forward
- Consider the reaction N2O4(g)2NO2(g). Draw a graph illustrating the changes of concentrations of N2O4 and NO2 as equilibrium is approached. Describe how the rates of the forward and reverse reactions change as the mixture approaches dynamic equilibrium. Why is this called a dynamic equilibrium?arrow_forwardAt 2300 K the equilibrium constant for the formation of NO(g) is 1.7 103. N2(g) + O2(g) 2 NO(g) (a) Analysis shows that the concentrations of N2 and O2 are both 0.25 M, and that of NO is 0.0042 M under certain conditions. Is the system at equilibrium? (b) If the system is not at equilibrium, in which direction does the reaction proceed? (c) When the system is at equilibrium, what are the equilibrium concentrations?arrow_forwardCalculate the equilibrium concentrations that result when 0.25 M O2 and 1.0 M HCl react and come to equilibrium. 4HCl(g)+O2(g)2Cl2+2H2O(g)Kc=3.11013arrow_forward
- Because calcium carbonate is a sink for CO32- in a lake, the student in Exercise 12.39 decides to go a step further and examine the equilibrium between carbonate ion and CaCOj. The reaction is Ca2+(aq) + COj2_(aq) ** CaCO,(s) The equilibrium constant for this reaction is 2.1 X 10*. If the initial calcium ion concentration is 0.02 AI and the carbonate concentration is 0.03 AI, what are the equilibrium concentrations of the ions? A student is simulating the carbonic acid—hydrogen carbonate equilibrium in a lake: H2COj(aq) H+(aq) + HCO}‘(aq) K = 4.4 X 10"7 She starts with 0.1000 AI carbonic acid. What are the concentrations of all species at equilibrium?arrow_forwardWhat is Le Chteliers principle? Consider the reaction 2NOCI(g)2NO(g)+Cl2(g) If this reaction is at equilibrium. what happens when the following changes occur? a. NOCI(g) is added. b. NO(g) is added. c. NOCI(g) is removed. d. Cl2(g) is removed. e. The container volume is decreased. For each of these changes, what happens to the value of K for the reaction as equilibrium is reached again? Give an example of a reaction for which the addition or removal of one of the reactants or products has no effect on the equilibrium position. In general, how will the equilibrium position of a gas-phase reaction be affected if the volume of the reaction vessel changes? Are there reactions that will not have their equilibria shifted by a change in volume? Explain. Why does changing the pressure in a rigid container by adding an inert gas not shift the equilibrium position for a gas-phase reaction?arrow_forward1’he reaction in Exercise 12.33 was repeated. This time, the reaction began when only NO was injected into the reaction container. 110.200 mol L_l NO was injected, what were the equilibrium concentrations of all species? The following reaction establishes equilibrium at 2000 K: N2(g) + O2(g) ^2 NO K = 4.1 X 10~4 If the reaction began with 0.100 mol L-1 of N2 and 0.100 mol L"' ofO2, what were the equilibrium concentrations of all species?arrow_forward
- The value of the equilibrium constant, K, is dependent on which of the following? (There may be more than one answer.) a. the initial concentrations of the reactants b. the initial concentrations of the products c. the temperature of the system d. the nature of the reactants and products Explain.arrow_forwardIn the reaction in Exercise 12.33, another trial was carried out. The reaction began with an initial concentration of N2 equal to the initial concentration of NO. Each had a concentration of 0.100 mol L-1. WTat were the equilibrium concentrations of all species? The following reaction establishes equilibrium at 2000 K: N2(g) + O2(g) ^2 NO K = 4.1 X 10~4 If the reaction began with 0.100 mol L-1 of N2 and 0.100 mol L'1 ofO2, what were the equilibrium concentrations of all species?arrow_forwardConsider the reaction 2N2O(g) + O2(g) 4NO(g) Suppose the system is at equilibrium, and then an additional mole of N2O(g) is injected into the system at constant temperature. Once the reaction reestablishes equilibrium, has the amount of N2O increased or decreased from its original equilibrium amount? Explain. What happens to the value of the equilibrium constant with this change?arrow_forward
- General, Organic, and Biological ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781285853918Author:H. Stephen StokerPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: An Atoms First ApproachChemistryISBN:9781305079243Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. ZumdahlPublisher:Cengage LearningIntroductory Chemistry: A FoundationChemistryISBN:9781337399425Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Chemistry: The Molecular ScienceChemistryISBN:9781285199047Author:John W. Moore, Conrad L. StanitskiPublisher:Cengage LearningWorld of Chemistry, 3rd editionChemistryISBN:9781133109655Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan L. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Brooks / Cole / Cengage LearningChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage Learning