
Is acceleration directly proportional to mass, or is it inversely proportional to mass?

To identify: Whether the acceleration is directly or inversely proportional to mass
Answer to Problem 3A
Acceleration is inversely proportional to mass
Explanation of Solution
Introduction:
Acceleration is the change in velocity of an object with time and it is caused by applying a suitable force on the object.
Acceleartion not only depends on the force but also the mass of the object under consideration. A heavier object gets less accelerated compared to a lighter object. Thus it indicates that the acceleration and mass are inversely proportional to each other.
This can be mathematically expressed by the Newton’s second law which gives the force as,
Now, for a constant applied force, the acceleration can be expressed as,
This proves the inverse relationship between mass and acceleration.
Chapter 6 Solutions
Conceptual Physics: The High School Physics Program
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Microbiology: An Introduction
Microbiology with Diseases by Body System (5th Edition)
Campbell Biology (11th Edition)
Campbell Biology in Focus (2nd Edition)
Anatomy & Physiology (6th Edition)
Applications and Investigations in Earth Science (9th Edition)
- Imagine you are out for a stroll on a sunny day when you encounter a lake. Unpolarized light from the sun is reflected off the lake into your eyes. However, you notice when you put on your vertically polarized sunglasses, the light reflected off the lake no longer reaches your eyes. What is the angle between the unpolarized light and the surface of the water, in degrees, measured from the horizontal? You may assume the index of refraction of air is nair=1 and the index of refraction of water is nwater=1.33 . Round your answer to three significant figures. Just enter the number, nothing else.arrow_forwardDeduce what overvoltage is like in reversible electrodes.arrow_forwardpls help on thesearrow_forward
- pls help on thesearrow_forward20. Two small conducting spheres are placed on top of insulating pads. The 3.7 × 10-10 C sphere is fixed whie the 3.0 × 107 C sphere, initially at rest, is free to move. The mass of each sphere is 0.09 kg. If the spheres are initially 0.10 m apart, how fast will the sphere be moving when they are 1.5 m apart?arrow_forwardpls help on allarrow_forward
- 19. Mount Everest, Earth's highest mountain above sea level, has a peak of 8849 m above sea level. Assume that sea level defines the height of Earth's surface. (re = 6.38 × 106 m, ME = 5.98 × 1024 kg, G = 6.67 × 10 -11 Nm²/kg²) a. Calculate the strength of Earth's gravitational field at a point at the peak of Mount Everest. b. What is the ratio of the strength of Earth's gravitational field at a point 644416m below the surface of the Earth to a point at the top of Mount Everest? C. A tourist watching the sunrise on top of Mount Everest observes a satellite orbiting Earth at an altitude 3580 km above his position. Determine the speed of the satellite.arrow_forwardpls help on allarrow_forwardpls help on allarrow_forward
- College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781305952300Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris VuillePublisher:Cengage LearningUniversity Physics (14th Edition)PhysicsISBN:9780133969290Author:Hugh D. Young, Roger A. FreedmanPublisher:PEARSONIntroduction To Quantum MechanicsPhysicsISBN:9781107189638Author:Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.Publisher:Cambridge University Press
- Physics for Scientists and EngineersPhysicsISBN:9781337553278Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningLecture- Tutorials for Introductory AstronomyPhysicsISBN:9780321820464Author:Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina BrissendenPublisher:Addison-WesleyCollege Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio...PhysicsISBN:9780134609034Author:Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart FieldPublisher:PEARSON





