Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781337619455
Author: Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 33FF
a.
To determine
Introduction:
To describe: The audit procedures and audit evidence which can detect the misstatements identified in report of SEC.
b.
To determine
Introduction: Auditor’s assessment of management’s integrity has an inverse relationship with the quantity and quality of audit procedures performed by the auditor.
To describe:Impact of auditor’s assessment of management’s integrity on audit procedures and role of professional skepticism.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Rite-Aid in 1999. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think Rite-Aid would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud. Rite Aid failed to record an accrued expense for stock appreciation rights it had granted to employees, in a program that gave the recipients the right to receive cash or stock in amounts tied to increases in the market price of Rite Aid stock. Rite Aid should have accrued an expense of $22 million in FY 1998 and $33 million in FY 1999 for these obligations.
The following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Rite-Aid in 1999. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think Rite-Aid would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud.Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Rite Aid
should have written off the pertinent "dead deal" expenses at the time that it
decided not to build on each specific site. Such writeoffs would have reduced
reported income in the relevant periods. Instead, Rite Aid continued to carry these
items on its balance sheet as assets. By the end of FY 1999, the accumulated
dead deal expenses totaled $10.6 millio
The following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Rite-Aid in 1999. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think Rite-Aid would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud. From at least the first quarter of FY 1998 through the first quarter of FY 2000, Rite Aid also made improper adjusting entries known as "gross profit" entries. This practice had the effect of lowering cost of goods sold and accounts payable. These entries caused material overstatements of Rite Aid's net income in each quarterly period in which they were made. In the second quarter of FY 1999, for example, Rite Aid improperly reduced cost of goods sold and accounts payable by approximately $100 million. As a result of these "gross profit" entries alone, Rite Aid overstated pre-tax income by $100 million in the second quarter of FY 1999. In each of the relevant…
Chapter 6 Solutions
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
Ch. 6 - Prob. 1CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 2CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 3CYBKCh. 6 - Which of the following statements is true...Ch. 6 - Prob. 5CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 6CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 7CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 8CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 9CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 10CYBK
Ch. 6 - Prob. 11CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 12CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 13CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 14CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 15CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 16CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 17CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 18CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 19CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 20CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 1RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 2RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 3RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 4RQSCCh. 6 - Refer to Exhibit 6.2 and describe the differences...Ch. 6 - Prob. 6RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 7RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 8RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 10RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 11RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 12RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 13RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 14RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 15RQSCCh. 6 - Indicate how the auditor could use substantive...Ch. 6 - Prob. 17RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 18RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 19RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 20RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 21RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 22RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 23RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 24RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 25RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 26RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 27RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 28RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 29FFCh. 6 - Prob. 30FFCh. 6 - Prob. 31FFCh. 6 - Prob. 32FFCh. 6 - Prob. 33FFCh. 6 - MINISCRIBE (LO 1, 2) As reported in the Wall...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Which of the following is NOT a method UCI's former executive VP and CFO used to embezzle 2.97 million? options: 1) Charging personal purchases on UCI's corporate credit card, followed by arranging for UCI to pay the credit card statement by check 2) Preparing false expense reports and submitting them for reimbursement, resulting in payment to himself since nobody other than the accounts payable supervisor reviewed these reports 3) Adding family members to UCI's payroll and placing large checks into their bank accounts 4) Submitting unsupported check requests for personal credit card accounts and nonbusiness expenditures, such as construction work on his personal residencearrow_forwardKim Company, a CPA firm, conducted an audit for the 2020 financial statements of Erin Corporation. The auditors found that the accounting manager changed the journal entry for estimating bad debt expense to a smaller number to hide the poor results from extending credit to high risk customers. This made income materially higher than it otherwise would have been. This is an example of: Embezzlement Employee fraud Larceny Management fraud O None of the abovearrow_forwardAnsarrow_forward
- Read the facts of the case in Problem 2-26 to become familiar withthe fraud involving Koss Corporation. From the company’s October 7,2009, proxy statement (Def 14A filing with the SEC), we know the followingfacts about the company’s audit committee and its members:Thomas L. Doerr 65, has been a director of the company since 1987. In1972, Mr. Doerr co-founded Leeson Electric Corporation and served asits president and CEO until 1982. The company manufactures industrialelectric motors. In 1983, Mr. Doerr incorporated Doerr Corporation asa holding company for the purpose of acquiring established companiesinvolved in distributing products to industrial and commercial markets.Currently, Mr. Doerr serves as president of Doerr Corporation.Mr. Doerr owns no stock in Koss Corporation and received $24,000 incash compensation during 2009 to serve on the audit committee.Lawrence S. Mattson 77, has been a director of the company since 1978.Mr. Mattson is the retired president of Oster company, a…arrow_forwardEnron and Arthur Andersen UP Enron was an energy comp any based in Houston, Texas, that made energy trades. It was formed in 1985 with the merger of Houston Natural Gas and lnterNorth. After an aggressive expansion plan that involved risky financing transactions outside the original, fundamental business model of the company, Enron was billions of dollars in debt. Enron concealed this debt through hidden transactions with related-party partnerships, fraudulent accounting, and illegal loans. Enron is considered to be one of the largest and most important financial reporting frauds in history. The company ultimately filed for bankruptcy in 2001. One of the reasons that Enron was able to get away with the fraud for some rime was because of a low-quality audit by its external audit firm, Arthur Andersen. Prior to the failure of Enron in 2001, Arthur Andersen had been involved in two other major audit failures. These failed audits, related to frauds at Waste Management (1996) and Sunbeam (1997), should have raised red flags for management and any outside observers that some of the audit firm’s internal quality assurance processes were not working. When the federal government uncovered Enron’s fraud along with the string of poor quality audits at Arthur Andersen, the government forced the audit firm out of business. Internal documentation at Arthur Andersen showed that there were conflicts between the auditors and the audit committee of Enron, and that even though there were many individuals concerned about the accounting and disclosure practices at Enron, nothing was done by Andersen to report these problems. In fact, the leading partner on the audit, David Duncan, actively worked to ensure that Enron’s fraudulent financial reporting went uncovered. It appears that Duncan was motivated by the fact that Arthur Andersen was earning enormous consulting fees on the Enron engagement; Enron was a hugely important client for him personally and for the Houston office of Arthur Andersen. Together, these conflicts of interest clouded his independent judgment and professional skepticism. Around the time that Enron declared bankruptcy in late 2001, Arthur Andersen personnel in the Houston office began aggressively destroying documentation relating to the Enron engagement. This action enabled the federal government to file charges against Arthur Andersen that ultimately led to the downfall of the audit firm. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted partially in response to the Enron fraud and the revelation of the poor audit conducted by Arthur Andersen, which is why this case is of particular historical relevance. Considering these facts, answer the following questions: a. Members of Enron management were the individuals who perpetrated the financial statement fraud, this, why do you think the auditors were held responsible when they are not the ones actually making the fraudulent journal entries? b. Explain why the consulting fees and importance of Enron to David Duncan and the Houston office of Arthur Andersen might have affected Duncan’s independence, and thus the quality of the audits he supervised. c. Describe the likely users of Enron’s audited financial statements. How were these various user groups likely affected by the fraud? d. How might the sequential list of frauds perpetrated by Arthur Andersen client (Wage Management, Sunbeam, and finally Enron) have affected the decision by the SEC and federal prosecutors to aggressively seek Arthur Andersen’s legal demise?arrow_forwardSubject: Accounting Information System ETHICS, FRAUD, AND INTERNAL CONTROL Stated Problem: EXPENSE ACCOUNT FRAUD While auditing the financial statements of Petty Cor-poration, the certified public accounting firm of TrueBlue and Smith discovered that its client’s legal expenses account was abnormally high. Further investigation of the records indicated the following:•Since the beginning of the year, several disbursements totaling $15,000 had been made to the law firm of Swindle, Fox, and Kreip.•Swindle, Fox, and Kreip were not Petty Corporation's attorneys. A review of the canceled checks showed that they had been written and approved by Mary Boghas, the cash disbursements clerk. Boghas’s other duties included performing the end-of-month bank reconciliation. Subsequent investigation revealed that Swindle,Fox, and Kreip are representing Mary Boghas in an unrelated embezzlement case in which she is the defendant. The checks had been written in payment of her personal legal fees.…arrow_forward
- The following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Gateway. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud. On September 21, 2000, Gateway's sales representative sent an e-mail to the consumer leasing company confirming that the consumer leasing company would issue a purchase order for $16.5 million of PCs, for which it would receive a 5% discount, that the consumer leasing company would be billed by September 30, 2000 and would take the PCs by October 31, 2000.arrow_forwardWhich of the following statements is/are correct? O a. The ban on simultaneously offering consulting and auditing services to economically relevant companies within the framework of the FISG results from the bad experiences that BaFin had with corresponding offers in the context of the Wirecard scandal. O b. Violations of the so-called "blacklist" lead to significant fines being paid by the auditing company. Oc. According to the Financial Market Integrity Strengthening Act, companies are obliged to set up an audit committee to monitor the quality of the audit. O d. The external rotation of auditing firms requires more frequent tendering processes for auditing services.arrow_forwardMarshall Companies, Inc., holds a note receivable from a former subsidiary. Due to financial difficulties, the former subsidiary has been unable to pay the previous year’s interest on the note. Marshall agreed to restructure the debt by both delaying and reducing remaining cash payments. The concessions result in a credit loss on the creditor’s investment in the receivable. How is the credit loss on the troubled debt restructuring calculated?arrow_forward
- Identify one (1) real-life ‘financial reporting accounting fraud’ that occurred post 1990 (i.e. in the last 30 years), in any country, and answer the following questions: a) Discuss what specific accounting regulations were violated?arrow_forwardAssume that you are interviewed by a student newspaper regarding the nature of accounting fraud. The reporter says, "As I understand it, asset misappropriations are more likely to be found in small organizations, but not in larger organizations. On the other hand, fraudulent financial reporting is more likely to be found in larger organizations." How would you respond to the reporter's observation?arrow_forward# 18: In 2001, the Enron scandal rocked the world of accounting. What is the name of Enron's external auditor, who failed to detect rampant fraud at Enron and was indicted for obstruction of justice for shredding documents related to the audit? A. Coopers & Lybrand B. Grant Thornton C. Pricewaterhouse D. Arthur Andersen a och Bola Josi to ipval txoa silt at bumearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And AnalysisAccountingISBN:9781337788281Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald PagachPublisher:Cengage LearningBusiness/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And Analysis
Accounting
ISBN:9781337788281
Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage