Introduction:
It is about the degree of risk involved in the prudence shown the auditor while ascertaining the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, which might result into material statement if prudence is not displayed. It also wants us to explain that if there is a high risk factor decision and low risk decision is to be taken, how sufficiency and appropriateness goes in contrast and the materiality aspect is changed.
To explain:
It is about the importance of sufficiency and appropriateness factor of auditevidence, which may result into material misstatement related with that client. It is also about the contrast factor of difference in sufficiency and appropriateness, if it is the case of a high risk decision or a low risk decision.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 6 Solutions
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
- Which of the following statements is true regarding the sufficiency of evidence needed to test an account? a. Evidence sufficiency is a measure of evidence quality. b. Evidence sufficiency is affected by the quality of evidence. c. A relationship does not exist between evidence sufficiency and evidence quality. d. For a specific client, evidence sufficiency will be the same across all accounts.arrow_forwardEvidence that tends to make some fact in issue more or less likely than it would be without the evidence is called: A. Relevant evidence. B. Authenticated evidence. C. Direct evidence. D. Real evidence.arrow_forwardWhat is the relationship between Evidence and Detection Risk?arrow_forward
- Contrast the liability issues and disclosure of errors. Does disclosure minimize the risk? Does the disclosure improve avoidable events?arrow_forwardstate the effect on planned evidence (increase or decrease) of changing each of 'AN INCREASE IN ACCEPTABLE AUDIT RISK' factor, while the other factors remain unchanged.arrow_forwardDoes the MM theory appear to be correct according to either empirical research or observations offirms’ actual behavior? How do assumptions affectyour conclusion about whether the MM theoryappears to be correct?arrow_forward
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of an adverse auditarrow_forwardWhich of the following characteristics is not considered essential to audit evidence? a. Availability of evidence b. Reliability of evidence c. Sufficiency of evidence d. Relevance of evidencearrow_forwardThe two characteristics of the appropriateness of evidence are a. relevance and reliability. b. relevance and timeliness. c. relevance and accuracy. d. reliability and accuracy.arrow_forward
- Which of the following terms best describes the risk that audit procedures will fail to detect material misstatements? a. Control risk. b. Inherent risk. c. Detection risk. d. Audit risk.arrow_forwardWhat is the term given for information that should NOT be taken from one source as the collectors of the information may have collected this for a specific purpose? a. Accuracy b. REliability c. Completeness d. Biasarrow_forwardExplain what is meant by the term acceptable audit risk. Whatis its relevance to evidence accumulation?arrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College PubIntermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage Learning