CASE STUDY| Fish tales Aquatic vegetation overgrowth, usually controlled by dredging or herbicides, represents a significant issue in maintaining private and public waterways. In 1963, diploid grass carp were introduced in Arkansas to consume vegetation, but they reproduced prodigiously and spread to eventually become a hazard to aquatic ecosystems in 35 states. In the 1980s, many states adopted triploid grass carp as an alternative because of their high, but not absolute, sterility and their longevity of seven to ten years. Today, most states require permits for vegetation control by triploid carp, requiring their containment in the body of water to which they are introduced. Genetic modifications of organisms to achieve specific outcomes willcertainly become more common in the future and raise several interesting questions. Taking triploid carp as an example, what controversies may emerge as similar modified species become available for widespread use?

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 6, Problem 1CS

CASE STUDY| Fish tales

Aquatic vegetation overgrowth, usually controlled by dredging or herbicides, represents a significant issue in maintaining private and public waterways. In 1963, diploid grass carp were introduced in Arkansas to consume vegetation, but they reproduced prodigiously and spread to eventually become a hazard to aquatic ecosystems in 35 states. In the 1980s, many states adopted triploid grass carp as an alternative because of their high, but not absolute, sterility and their longevity of seven to ten years. Today, most states require permits for vegetation control by triploid carp, requiring their containment in the body of water to which they are introduced. Genetic modifications of organisms to achieve specific outcomes willcertainly become more common in the future and raise several interesting questions.

Taking triploid carp as an example, what controversies may emerge as similar modified species become available for widespread use?

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

19. On the diagram below a. Label the three pictures as: DNA; polypeptide; or RNA. b. Label the arrows as: translation or transcription/RNA processing. c. Add the following details to the diagram. Promoter region TATA box Transcription start site Transcription terminator Intron (A,B,C,D) Exons (1,2,3,4,5) Splice sites 5' cap 5' UTR (untranslated region) 3' poly A tail 3' UTR (untranslated region) Translational start (AUG) Translational stop (UGA, UAG, or UAA) N and C ends of polypeptide 0000

Match the letter labels in the figure below to the terms. Some letter labels are not used. MNNNNNNIN M C B A M D F E H K G 8

The diagram below illustrates a quorum sensing pathway from Staphylococcus aureus. Please answer the following questions. 1. Autoinduction is part of the quorum sensing system. Which promoter (P2 or P3) is critical for autoinduction? 2)This staphylococcus aureus grows on human wounds, causing severe infections. You would like to start a clinical trial to treat these wound infections. Please describe: a) What molecule do you recommend for the trial. Why? b) Your trial requires that Staphylococcus aureus be isolated from the wound and submitted to genome sequencing before admittance. Why? What are you testing for? 3) If a mutation arises where the Promoter P3 is constitutively active, how would that influence sensitivity to AIP? Please explain your rationale. 4) This pathway is sensitive to bacterial cell density. Describe two separate mutation that would render the pathway active independent of cell density. Briefly explain your rationale. Mutation 1 Mutation 2

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 6, Problem 1CS

CASE STUDY| Fish tales

Aquatic vegetation overgrowth, usually controlled by dredging or herbicides, represents a significant issue in maintaining private and public waterways. In 1963, diploid grass carp were introduced in Arkansas to consume vegetation, but they reproduced prodigiously and spread to eventually become a hazard to aquatic ecosystems in 35 states. In the 1980s, many states adopted triploid grass carp as an alternative because of their high, but not absolute, sterility and their longevity of seven to ten years. Today, most states require permits for vegetation control by triploid carp, requiring their containment in the body of water to which they are introduced. Genetic modifications of organisms to achieve specific outcomes willcertainly become more common in the future and raise several interesting questions.

Taking triploid carp as an example, what controversies may emerge as similar modified species become available for widespread use?

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 6, Problem 1CS

CASE STUDY| Fish tales

Aquatic vegetation overgrowth, usually controlled by dredging or herbicides, represents a significant issue in maintaining private and public waterways. In 1963, diploid grass carp were introduced in Arkansas to consume vegetation, but they reproduced prodigiously and spread to eventually become a hazard to aquatic ecosystems in 35 states. In the 1980s, many states adopted triploid grass carp as an alternative because of their high, but not absolute, sterility and their longevity of seven to ten years. Today, most states require permits for vegetation control by triploid carp, requiring their containment in the body of water to which they are introduced. Genetic modifications of organisms to achieve specific outcomes willcertainly become more common in the future and raise several interesting questions.

Taking triploid carp as an example, what controversies may emerge as similar modified species become available for widespread use?

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 6, Problem 1CS

CASE STUDY| Fish tales

Aquatic vegetation overgrowth, usually controlled by dredging or herbicides, represents a significant issue in maintaining private and public waterways. In 1963, diploid grass carp were introduced in Arkansas to consume vegetation, but they reproduced prodigiously and spread to eventually become a hazard to aquatic ecosystems in 35 states. In the 1980s, many states adopted triploid grass carp as an alternative because of their high, but not absolute, sterility and their longevity of seven to ten years. Today, most states require permits for vegetation control by triploid carp, requiring their containment in the body of water to which they are introduced. Genetic modifications of organisms to achieve specific outcomes willcertainly become more common in the future and raise several interesting questions.

Taking triploid carp as an example, what controversies may emerge as similar modified species become available for widespread use?

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.