Information Technology Project Management
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781337101356
Author: Kathy Schwalbe
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Expert Solution & Answer
Chapter 5, Problem 5T
Explanation of Solution
Strategy for scope validation:
The only strategy used for validating scope is inspection. Inspection entails reviewing the deliverables to ensure they meet the stakeholder needs. Some of the ways to do this:
- Analysis
- This method is used if the user can’t see what is happening, but he can infer from the result that things work correctly.
- Test
- For quantifiable requirements, the user can measure...
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Have you written any test cases without any document like FSD or design document? Do you require updating the initial test case in project life cycle any time?
Draw the project map with and without the architecture below to better understand it. considering the product's impact.
Prepare taxonomy for testing strategy. How can you use the above taxonomy for your team project?
Chapter 5 Solutions
Information Technology Project Management
Ch. 5 - What is involved in project scope management, and...Ch. 5 - Prob. 2DQCh. 5 - Prob. 4DQCh. 5 - Prob. 5DQCh. 5 - Why do you need a good WBS to use project...Ch. 5 - You are working on a project to develop a new or...Ch. 5 - Read the report cited in the chapter called PMIs...Ch. 5 - Prob. 6ECh. 5 - Prob. 1TCh. 5 - Prob. 2T
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- This might result in either feature creep or scope creep, both of which are undesirable. Explain to everyone how the two concepts are distinct from one another so that they may comprehend your explanation. In what ways do you believe these two problems stem from the same source? In the event that these two unpleasant events take place while working on this project, how disastrous may the situation become?arrow_forward5. Ône of your group members asks you to review a paragraph he wrote for the Background Information part of the group project. It's really bad. Describe the problems he has with each part of the paragraph, with examples.arrow_forwardExplain the poten�al decision points, and their loca�on in the project cycle.List and explain the possible dependencies, and their poten�al impact on the course of theproject. List any assump�ons you had to make when formula�ng the plan.arrow_forward
- This might lead to scope creep or feature creep, both of which are negative outcomes. Help the listeners understand your point by describing the differences between the two ideas. Please explain how you arrive at the conclusion that the root cause of these two issues is the same. When working on this project, how awful would it be if these two things happened?arrow_forwardBoth scope creep and feature creep are outcomes of this situation. Elucidate the dichotomy between the two concepts for the reader. Please provide an explanation for the underlying causes of these two issues. In the event that these two issues manifest, what are the potential negative outcomes that could befall this project?arrow_forwardExamine the article's sample project, consider your project, and evaluate whether the waterfall approach is appropriate.arrow_forward
- Both scope creep and feature creep are consequences of this. Clarify the contrast between the two ideas for the reader. Please explain the root of these two issues. When these two problems arise, what is the worst that may happen with this project?arrow_forwardThe project's viability may be better assessed if a map is drawn both with and without the central architecture. Taking into account the impact of the final product.arrow_forwardScope creep and feature creep are two possible outcomes. Distinguish between the two ideas using concrete examples. What do you think is the root of these two issues? The worst-case scenario in this project is what happens if these two undesired scenarios arise?arrow_forward
- It's possible that drawing a project's map both with and without its underlying architecture can help you understand it better. Keeping in mind the impact that the final product will have.arrow_forwardScope creep and feature creep are both possible outcomes of this. Describe the differences between the two ideas so that everyone can understand them. What do you think the root of these two issues is? How bad may things go if these two unwelcome circumstances arise throughout the course of this project?arrow_forwardIt will help you fathom the project better if you draw the project's map both with and without the underlying architecture. Taking into account the impact that the finished product will have.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Information Technology Project ManagementComputer ScienceISBN:9781337101356Author:Kathy SchwalbePublisher:Cengage Learning
Information Technology Project Management
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337101356
Author:Kathy Schwalbe
Publisher:Cengage Learning