
Which of the two alternatives should be selected.

Answer to Problem 34P
The option to be implemented is the automated process, since it results in an overall lower
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Initial Cost:
Labor Intensive Process $0
Automated Process $55,000
Installation Cost:
Labor Intensive Process $0
Automated Process $15,500
Operation and Maintenance costs:
Labor Intensive Process $1,500
Automated Process $4,800
Increase in Operation and Maintenance costs:
Labor Intensive Process $200
Automated Process $600
Labor Costs:
Labor Intensive Process $116,000
Automated Process $41,000
Increase in Labor Costs:
Labor Intensive Process 4%
Automated Process 4%
Salvage Value in year 15:
Labor Intensive Process $5,000
Automated Process $19,000
Rate of Interest for Calculation: 25%
Based on the above information, the following tables outlines the
Labor Intensive Process:
Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @25% | Present value |
0 | Installation Cost | $- | 1.0000 | $- |
1 | Annual Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.8000 | $ 1,200.00 |
2 | Annual Operating costs | $ 1,700.00 | 0.6400 | $ 1,088.00 |
3 | Annual Operating costs | $ 1,900.00 | 0.5120 | $ 972.80 |
4 | Annual Operating costs | $ 2,100.00 | 0.4096 | $ 860.16 |
5 | Annual Operating costs | $ 2,300.00 | 0.3277 | $ 753.71 |
6 | Annual Operating costs | $ 2,500.00 | 0.2621 | $ 655.25 |
7 | Annual Operating costs | $ 2,700.00 | 0.2097 | $ 566.19 |
8 | Annual Operating costs | $ 2,900.00 | 0.1678 | $ 486.62 |
9 | Annual Operating costs | $ 3,100.00 | 0.1342 | $ 416.02 |
10 | Annual Operating costs | $ 3,300.00 | 0.1074 | $ 354.42 |
11 | Annual Operating costs | $ 3,500.00 | 0.0859 | $ 300.65 |
12 | Annual Operating costs | $ 3,700.00 | 0.0687 | $ 254.19 |
13 | Annual Operating costs | $ 3,900.00 | 0.0550 | $ 214.50 |
14 | Annual Operating costs | $ 4,100.00 | 0.0440 | $ 180.40 |
15 | Annual Operating costs | $ 4,100.00 | 0.0352 | $ 144.32 |
1 | Annual Labor costs | $116,000.00 | 0.8000 | $92,800.00 |
2 | Annual Labor costs | $120,640.00 | 0.6400 | $77,209.60 |
3 | Annual Labor costs | $125,465.60 | 0.5120 | $64,238.39 |
4 | Annual Labor costs | $130,484.22 | 0.4096 | $53,446.34 |
5 | Annual Labor costs | $135,703.59 | 0.3277 | $44,470.07 |
6 | Annual Labor costs | $141,131.74 | 0.2621 | $36,990.63 |
7 | Annual Labor costs | $146,777.01 | 0.2097 | $30,779.14 |
8 | Annual Labor costs | $152,648.09 | 0.1678 | $25,614.35 |
9 | Annual Labor costs | $158,754.01 | 0.1342 | $21,304.79 |
10 | Annual Labor costs | $165,104.17 | 0.1074 | $17,732.19 |
11 | Annual Labor costs | $171,708.34 | 0.0859 | $14,749.75 |
12 | Annual Labor costs | $178,576.67 | 0.0687 | $12,268.22 |
13 | Annual Labor costs | $185,719.74 | 0.0550 | $10,214.59 |
14 | Annual Labor costs | $193,148.53 | 0.0440 | $ 8,498.54 |
15 | Annual Labor costs | $200,874.47 | 0.0352 | $ 7,070.78 |
15 | Salvage Value | $ (5,000.00) | 0.0352 | $(176.00) |
Net Present value | $525,658.58 |
Automated Process:
Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @25% | Present value |
0 | Installation Cost | $70,500.00 | 1.0000 | $70,500.00 |
1 | Annual Operating costs | $4,800.00 | 0.8000 | $3,840.00 |
2 | Annual Operating costs | $5,400.00 | 0.6400 | $3,456.00 |
3 | Annual Operating costs | $6,000.00 | 0.5120 | $3,072.00 |
4 | Annual Operating costs | $6,600.00 | 0.4096 | $2,703.36 |
5 | Annual Operating costs | $7,200.00 | 0.3277 | $2,359.44 |
6 | Annual Operating costs | $7,800.00 | 0.2621 | $2,044.38 |
7 | Annual Operating costs | $8,400.00 | 0.2097 | $1,761.48 |
8 | Annual Operating costs | $9,000.00 | 0.1678 | $1,510.20 |
9 | Annual Operating costs | $9,600.00 | 0.1342 | $1,288.32 |
10 | Annual Operating costs | $10,200.00 | 0.1074 | $1,095.48 |
11 | Annual Operating costs | $10,800.00 | 0.0859 | $927.72 |
12 | Annual Operating costs | $11,400.00 | 0.0687 | $783.18 |
13 | Annual Operating costs | $12,000.00 | 0.0550 | $660.00 |
14 | Annual Operating costs | $12,600.00 | 0.0440 | $554.40 |
15 | Annual Operating costs | $13,200.00 | 0.0352 | $464.64 |
1 | Annual Labor costs | $41,000.00 | 0.8000 | $32,800.00 |
2 | Annual Labor costs | $42,640.00 | 0.6400 | $27,289.60 |
3 | Annual Labor costs | $44,345.60 | 0.5120 | $22,704.95 |
4 | Annual Labor costs | $46,119.42 | 0.4096 | $18,890.51 |
5 | Annual Labor costs | $47,964.20 | 0.3277 | $15,717.87 |
6 | Annual Labor costs | $49,882.77 | 0.2621 | $13,074.27 |
7 | Annual Labor costs | $51,878.08 | 0.2097 | $10,878.83 |
8 | Annual Labor costs | $53,953.20 | 0.1678 | $9,053.35 |
9 | Annual Labor costs | $56,111.33 | 0.1342 | $7,530.14 |
10 | Annual Labor costs | $58,355.78 | 0.1074 | $6,267.41 |
11 | Annual Labor costs | $60,690.02 | 0.0859 | $5,213.27 |
12 | Annual Labor costs | $63,117.62 | 0.0687 | $4,336.18 |
13 | Annual Labor costs | $65,642.32 | 0.0550 | $3,610.33 |
14 | Annual Labor costs | $68,268.01 | 0.0440 | $3,003.79 |
15 | Annual Labor costs | $70,998.73 | 0.0352 | $2,499.16 |
15 | Salvage Value | ($19,000.00) | 0.0352 | ($668.80) |
Net Present value | $279,221.46 |
Net present value is the difference of Sum of Present values of cash inflows and Sum of Present values of cash outflows. If the value is positive then the project may be accepted. While evaluation of two or more alternatives takes place, then the proposal with the higher net present value may be selected since it results in a greater
In the given scenario, Present values are calculated by calculating the present values of cash inflows in the form of salvage value and cash outflows such as installation cost and operating cost.
In case of the labor intensive
In case of the automated process the Installation Cost is $70,500 i.e. $55,000 for the Initial cost and $15,500 for the installation costs, Annual Operating costs are $4,800 with an increase of $600 each year. Annual Labor costs is $41,000 with an increase of 4% each year. Salvage value at the end of year 15 is $19,000.
Present value factor is calculated as 1/1.25 ^ N where N is the year of operation
Conclusion:
Hence the process to be implemented is the automated process since it results in lower overall cash flow for a period of 15 years.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 5 Solutions
ENGINEERING ECO ANALYSIS W/STUDY GUIDE
- not use ai pleasearrow_forward• Prismatic Cards: A prismatic card will be a card that counts as having every suit. We will denote, e.g., a prismatic Queen card by Q*. With this notation, 2.3045 Q would be a double flush since every card is a diamond and a heart. • Wild Cards: A wild card counts as having every suit and every denomination. Denote wild cards with a W; if there are multiple, we will denote them W₁, W2, etc. With this notation, W2 20.30054 would be both a three-of-a-kind (three 2's) and a flush (5 diamonds). If we add multiple wild cards to the deck, they count as distinct cards, so that (e.g.) the following two hands count as "different hands" when counting: W15 5Q and W255◊♡♡♣♣ In addition, 1. Let's start with the unmodified double-suited deck. (a) Call a hand a flush house if it is a flush and a full house, i.e. if all cards share a suit and there are 3 cards of one denomination and two of another. For example, 550. house. How many different flush house hands are there? 2. Suppose we add one wild…arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- In a classic oil-drilling example, you are trying to decide whether to drill for oil on a field that might or might not contain any oil. Before making this decision, you have the option of hiring a geologist to perform some seismic tests and then predict whether there is any oil or not. You assess that if there is actually oil, the geologist will predict there is oil with probability 0.85 . You also assess that if there is no oil, the geologist will predict there is no oil with probability 0.90. Please answer the two questions below, as I am trying to ensure that I am correct. 1. Why will these two probabilities not appear on the decision tree? 2. Which probabilities will be on the decision tree?arrow_forwardAsap pleasearrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- not use ai pleasearrow_forwardIn this question, you will test relative purchasing parity (PPP) using the data. Use yearly data from FRED website from 1971 to 2020: (i) The Canadian Dollars to U.S. Dollar Spot Exchange Rate (ER) (ii) Consumer price index for Canada (CAN_CPI), and (iii) Consumer price index for the US (US_CPI). Inflation is measured by the consumer price index (CPI). The relative PPP equation is: AE CAN$/US$ ECAN$/US$ = π CAN - πUS Submit the Excel sheet that you worked on. 1. First, compute the percentage change in the exchange rate (left-hand side of the equation). Caculate the variable for each year from 1972 to 2020 in Column E (named Change_ER) of the Excel sheet. For example, for 1972, compute E3: (B3-B2)/B2). ER1972 ER1971 ER 1971 (in Excel, the formula in cellarrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- 8. The current price of 3M stock is $87 per share. The previous dividend paid was $5.96, and the next dividend is $6.25, assuming a growth rate of 4.86% per year. What is the forward (next 12 months) dividend yield? Show at least two decimal places, as in x.xx% %arrow_forwardJoy's Frozen Yogurt shops have enjoyed rapid growth in northeastern states in recent years. From the analysis of Joy's various outlets, it was found that the demand curve follows this pattern: Q=200-300P+1201 +657-250A +400A; where Q = number of cups served per week P = average price paid for each cup I = per capita income in the given market (thousands) Taverage outdoor temperature A competition's monthly advertising expenditures (thousands) = A; = Joy's own monthly advertising expenditures (thousands) One of the outlets has the following conditions: P = 1.50, I = 10, T = 60, A₁ = 15, A; = 10 1. Estimate the number of cups served per week by this outlet. Also determine the outlet's demand curve. 2. What would be the effect of a $5,000 increase in the competitor's advertising expenditure? Illustrate the effect on the outlet's demand curve. 3. What would Joy's advertising expenditure have to be to counteract this effect?arrow_forwardThe Compute Company store has been selling its special word processing software, Aceword, during the last 10 months. Monthly sales and the price for Aceword are shown in the following table. Also shown are the prices for a competitive software, Goodwrite, and estimates of monthly family income. Calculate the appropriate elasticities, keeping in mind that you can calculate an elasticity measure only when all other factors do not change (using Excel). For example, price elasticities, months 1-2. Month Price Aceword Quantity Aceword Family Income Price Goodwrite 1 $120 200 $4,000 $130 21 120 210 4,000 145 3 120 220 4,200 145 4 110 240 4,200 145 90 5 115 230 4,200 145 6 115 215 4,200 125 10 7899 115 220 4,400 125 105 230 4,400 125 105 235 4,600 125 105 220 4,600 115arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





