
Which of the two alternatives should be selected.

Answer to Problem 34P
The option to be implemented is the automated process, since it results in an overall lower
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Initial Cost:
Labor Intensive Process $0
Automated Process $55,000
Installation Cost:
Labor Intensive Process $0
Automated Process $15,500
Operation and Maintenance costs:
Labor Intensive Process $1,500
Automated Process $4,800
Increase in Operation and Maintenance costs:
Labor Intensive Process $200
Automated Process $600
Labor Costs:
Labor Intensive Process $116,000
Automated Process $41,000
Increase in Labor Costs:
Labor Intensive Process 4%
Automated Process 4%
Salvage Value in year 15:
Labor Intensive Process $5,000
Automated Process $19,000
Rate of Interest for Calculation: 25%
Based on the above information, the following tables outlines the
Labor Intensive Process:
Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @25% | Present value |
0 | Installation Cost | $- | 1.0000 | $- |
1 | Annual Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.8000 | $ 1,200.00 |
2 | Annual Operating costs | $ 1,700.00 | 0.6400 | $ 1,088.00 |
3 | Annual Operating costs | $ 1,900.00 | 0.5120 | $ 972.80 |
4 | Annual Operating costs | $ 2,100.00 | 0.4096 | $ 860.16 |
5 | Annual Operating costs | $ 2,300.00 | 0.3277 | $ 753.71 |
6 | Annual Operating costs | $ 2,500.00 | 0.2621 | $ 655.25 |
7 | Annual Operating costs | $ 2,700.00 | 0.2097 | $ 566.19 |
8 | Annual Operating costs | $ 2,900.00 | 0.1678 | $ 486.62 |
9 | Annual Operating costs | $ 3,100.00 | 0.1342 | $ 416.02 |
10 | Annual Operating costs | $ 3,300.00 | 0.1074 | $ 354.42 |
11 | Annual Operating costs | $ 3,500.00 | 0.0859 | $ 300.65 |
12 | Annual Operating costs | $ 3,700.00 | 0.0687 | $ 254.19 |
13 | Annual Operating costs | $ 3,900.00 | 0.0550 | $ 214.50 |
14 | Annual Operating costs | $ 4,100.00 | 0.0440 | $ 180.40 |
15 | Annual Operating costs | $ 4,100.00 | 0.0352 | $ 144.32 |
1 | Annual Labor costs | $116,000.00 | 0.8000 | $92,800.00 |
2 | Annual Labor costs | $120,640.00 | 0.6400 | $77,209.60 |
3 | Annual Labor costs | $125,465.60 | 0.5120 | $64,238.39 |
4 | Annual Labor costs | $130,484.22 | 0.4096 | $53,446.34 |
5 | Annual Labor costs | $135,703.59 | 0.3277 | $44,470.07 |
6 | Annual Labor costs | $141,131.74 | 0.2621 | $36,990.63 |
7 | Annual Labor costs | $146,777.01 | 0.2097 | $30,779.14 |
8 | Annual Labor costs | $152,648.09 | 0.1678 | $25,614.35 |
9 | Annual Labor costs | $158,754.01 | 0.1342 | $21,304.79 |
10 | Annual Labor costs | $165,104.17 | 0.1074 | $17,732.19 |
11 | Annual Labor costs | $171,708.34 | 0.0859 | $14,749.75 |
12 | Annual Labor costs | $178,576.67 | 0.0687 | $12,268.22 |
13 | Annual Labor costs | $185,719.74 | 0.0550 | $10,214.59 |
14 | Annual Labor costs | $193,148.53 | 0.0440 | $ 8,498.54 |
15 | Annual Labor costs | $200,874.47 | 0.0352 | $ 7,070.78 |
15 | Salvage Value | $ (5,000.00) | 0.0352 | $(176.00) |
Net Present value | $525,658.58 |
Automated Process:
Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @25% | Present value |
0 | Installation Cost | $70,500.00 | 1.0000 | $70,500.00 |
1 | Annual Operating costs | $4,800.00 | 0.8000 | $3,840.00 |
2 | Annual Operating costs | $5,400.00 | 0.6400 | $3,456.00 |
3 | Annual Operating costs | $6,000.00 | 0.5120 | $3,072.00 |
4 | Annual Operating costs | $6,600.00 | 0.4096 | $2,703.36 |
5 | Annual Operating costs | $7,200.00 | 0.3277 | $2,359.44 |
6 | Annual Operating costs | $7,800.00 | 0.2621 | $2,044.38 |
7 | Annual Operating costs | $8,400.00 | 0.2097 | $1,761.48 |
8 | Annual Operating costs | $9,000.00 | 0.1678 | $1,510.20 |
9 | Annual Operating costs | $9,600.00 | 0.1342 | $1,288.32 |
10 | Annual Operating costs | $10,200.00 | 0.1074 | $1,095.48 |
11 | Annual Operating costs | $10,800.00 | 0.0859 | $927.72 |
12 | Annual Operating costs | $11,400.00 | 0.0687 | $783.18 |
13 | Annual Operating costs | $12,000.00 | 0.0550 | $660.00 |
14 | Annual Operating costs | $12,600.00 | 0.0440 | $554.40 |
15 | Annual Operating costs | $13,200.00 | 0.0352 | $464.64 |
1 | Annual Labor costs | $41,000.00 | 0.8000 | $32,800.00 |
2 | Annual Labor costs | $42,640.00 | 0.6400 | $27,289.60 |
3 | Annual Labor costs | $44,345.60 | 0.5120 | $22,704.95 |
4 | Annual Labor costs | $46,119.42 | 0.4096 | $18,890.51 |
5 | Annual Labor costs | $47,964.20 | 0.3277 | $15,717.87 |
6 | Annual Labor costs | $49,882.77 | 0.2621 | $13,074.27 |
7 | Annual Labor costs | $51,878.08 | 0.2097 | $10,878.83 |
8 | Annual Labor costs | $53,953.20 | 0.1678 | $9,053.35 |
9 | Annual Labor costs | $56,111.33 | 0.1342 | $7,530.14 |
10 | Annual Labor costs | $58,355.78 | 0.1074 | $6,267.41 |
11 | Annual Labor costs | $60,690.02 | 0.0859 | $5,213.27 |
12 | Annual Labor costs | $63,117.62 | 0.0687 | $4,336.18 |
13 | Annual Labor costs | $65,642.32 | 0.0550 | $3,610.33 |
14 | Annual Labor costs | $68,268.01 | 0.0440 | $3,003.79 |
15 | Annual Labor costs | $70,998.73 | 0.0352 | $2,499.16 |
15 | Salvage Value | ($19,000.00) | 0.0352 | ($668.80) |
Net Present value | $279,221.46 |
Net present value is the difference of Sum of Present values of cash inflows and Sum of Present values of cash outflows. If the value is positive then the project may be accepted. While evaluation of two or more alternatives takes place, then the proposal with the higher net present value may be selected since it results in a greater
In the given scenario, Present values are calculated by calculating the present values of cash inflows in the form of salvage value and cash outflows such as installation cost and operating cost.
In case of the labor intensive
In case of the automated process the Installation Cost is $70,500 i.e. $55,000 for the Initial cost and $15,500 for the installation costs, Annual Operating costs are $4,800 with an increase of $600 each year. Annual Labor costs is $41,000 with an increase of 4% each year. Salvage value at the end of year 15 is $19,000.
Present value factor is calculated as 1/1.25 ^ N where N is the year of operation
Conclusion:
Hence the process to be implemented is the automated process since it results in lower overall cash flow for a period of 15 years.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 5 Solutions
ENGINEERING ECO ANALYSIS W/STUDY GUIDE
- Styrofoam is non-biodegradable and is not easily recyclable. Many cities and at least one state have enacted laws that ban the use of polystyrene containers. These locales understand that banning these containers will force many businesses to turn to other more expensive forms of packaging and cups, but argue the ban is environmentally important. Shane owns a firm with a conventional production function resulting in U-shaped ATC, AVC, and MC curves. Shane's business sells takeout food and drinks that are currently packaged in styrofoam containers and cups. Graph the short-run AFC0, AVC0, ATC0, and MC0 curves for Shane's firm before the ban on using styrofoam containers.arrow_forwardd-farrow_forwarda-c pleasearrow_forward
- d-farrow_forwardPART II: Multipart Problems wood or solem of triflussd aidi 1. Assume that a society has a polluting industry comprising two firms, where the industry-level marginal abatement cost curve is given by: MAC = 24 - ()E and the marginal damage function is given by: MDF = 2E. What is the efficient level of emissions? b. What constant per-unit emissions tax could achieve the efficient emissions level? points) c. What is the net benefit to society of moving from the unregulated emissions level to the efficient level? In response to industry complaints about the costs of the tax, a cap-and-trade program is proposed. The marginal abatement cost curves for the two firms are given by: MAC=24-E and MAC2 = 24-2E2. d. How could a cap-and-trade program that achieves the same level of emissions as the tax be designed to reduce the costs of regulation to the two firms?arrow_forwardOnly #4 please, Use a graph please if needed to help provearrow_forward
- a-carrow_forwardFor these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. 2. A stated-preference method will provide a measure of the value of Komodo dragons that is more accurate than the value estimated through application of the travel cost model to visitation data for Komodo National Park in Indonesia. 3. A correlation between community demographics and the present location of polluting facilities is sufficient to claim a violation of distributive justice. olsvrc Q 4. When the damages from pollution are uncertain, a price-based mechanism is best equipped to manage the costs of the regulator's imperfect…arrow_forwardFor environmental economics, question number 2 only please-- thank you!arrow_forward
- For these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. cullog iba linevoz ve bubivorearrow_forwardExercise 3 The production function of a firm is described by the following equation Q=10,000-3L2 where L stands for the units of labour. a) Draw a graph for this equation. Use the quantity produced in the y-axis, and the units of labour in the x-axis. b) What is the maximum production level? c) How many units of labour are needed at that point? d) Provide one reference with you answer.arrow_forwardExercise 1 Consider the market supply curve which passes through the intercept and from which the market equilibrium data is known, this is, the price and quantity of equilibrium PE=50 and QE=2000. Considering those two points, find the equation of the supply. Draw a graph of this line. Provide one reference with your answer. Exercise 2 Considering the previous supply line, determine if the following demand function corresponds to the market demand equilibrium stated above. QD=3000-2p.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





