ENGINEERING ECO ANALYSIS W/STUDY GUIDE
13th Edition
ISBN: 9780190693053
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 31P
To determine
(a)
Which of the two alternatives should be selected assuming a 10% rate of interest.
Expert Solution
Answer to Problem 31P
The Option to be implemented is Option 2, since it results in a lower
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Option 1:
Install one cable now for 4000 lines. Installation cost $20,000 and annual maintenance costs would be $1,500.
Option 2:
Install one cable for 2000 lines now and one cable for 2000 lines after 10 years. Installation cost $15,000 and annual maintenance costs would be $1,000.
Rate of interest for calculation: 10%.
Based on the above information, the following tables outlines the
Option 1:
| Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
| 0 | Installation Cost | $20,000.00 | 1 | $20,000.00 |
| 1 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.9091 | $1,363.64 |
| 2 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.8264 | $1,239.67 |
| 3 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.7513 | $1,126.97 |
| 4 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.6830 | $1,024.52 |
| 5 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.6209 | $931.38 |
| 5 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.6209 | $931.38 |
| 6 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.5645 | $846.71 |
| 7 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.5132 | $769.74 |
| 8 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.4665 | $699.76 |
| 9 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.4241 | $636.15 |
| 10 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.3855 | $578.31 |
| 11 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.3505 | $525.74 |
| 12 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.3186 | $477.95 |
| 13 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.2897 | $434.50 |
| 14 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.2633 | $395.00 |
| 15 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.2394 | $359.09 |
| 16 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.2176 | $326.44 |
| 17 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.1978 | $296.77 |
| 18 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.1799 | $269.79 |
| 19 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.1635 | $245.26 |
| 20 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.1486 | $222.97 |
| 21 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.1351 | $202.70 |
| 22 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.1228 | $184.27 |
| 23 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.1117 | $167.52 |
| 24 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.1015 | $152.25 |
| 25 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.0923 | $138.44 |
| 26 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.0839 | $125.86 |
| 27 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.0763 | $114.42 |
| 28 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.0693 | $104.02 |
| 29 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.0630 | $94.56 |
| 30 | Operating costs | $1,500.00 | 0.0573 | $85.96 |
| Net cash outflow | $35,071.75 |
Option 2:
| Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
| 0 | Installation Cost | $15,000.00 | 1 | $15,000.00 |
| 1 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.9091 | $909.09 |
| 2 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.8264 | $826.45 |
| 3 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.7513 | $751.31 |
| 4 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.6830 | $683.01 |
| 5 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.6209 | $620.92 |
| 5 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.6209 | $620.92 |
| 6 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.5645 | $564.47 |
| 7 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.5132 | $513.16 |
| 8 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.4665 | $466.51 |
| 9 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.4241 | $424.10 |
| 10 | Operating costs | $1,000.00 | 0.3855 | $385.54 |
| 10 | Installation Cost | $15,000.00 | 0.3855 | $5,783.15 |
| 11 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.3505 | $700.99 |
| 12 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.3186 | $637.26 |
| 13 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.2897 | $579.33 |
| 14 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.2633 | $526.66 |
| 15 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.2394 | $478.78 |
| 16 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.2176 | $435.26 |
| 17 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.1978 | $395.69 |
| 18 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.1799 | $359.72 |
| 19 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.1635 | $327.02 |
| 20 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.1486 | $297.29 |
| 21 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.1351 | $270.26 |
| 22 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.1228 | $245.69 |
| 23 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.1117 | $223.36 |
| 24 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.1015 | $203.05 |
| 25 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.0923 | $184.59 |
| 26 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.0839 | $167.81 |
| 27 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.0763 | $152.56 |
| 28 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.0693 | $138.69 |
| 29 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.0630 | $126.08 |
| 30 | Operating costs | $2,000.00 | 0.0573 | $114.62 |
| Net cash outflow | $34,113.33 |
Net present value is the difference of Sum of Present values of cash inflows and Sum of Present values of cash outflows. If the value is positive then the project may be accepted. While evaluation of two or more alternatives takes place, then the proposal with the higher net present value may be selected since it results in a greater
In the given scenario, Present values are calculated by calculating the present values of cash outflows such as installation cost and operating cost.
Present value factor is calculated as 1/1.10 ^ N where N is the year of operation of the refrigerator.
Deferment of capital expenditure to Year 10 in case of Option 2 results in a lower overall cash outflow despite increase in the annual operating costs from years 11-30. This is owing to the present value factor.
Conclusion:
Hence the Option to be implemented is Option 2 since it results in lower overall cash outflow.
To determine
(b)
Which of the two alternatives should be selected.
Expert Solution
Answer to Problem 31P
The Option to be implemented is Option 1, since it results in a lower cash outflow for a period of 30 years.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Option 1:
Install one cable now for 4000 lines. Installation cost $20,000 and annual maintenance costs would be $1,500.
Option 2:
Install one cable for 2000 lines now and one cable for 2000 lines after 5 years. Installation cost $15,000 and annual maintenance costs would be $1,000.
Rate of interest for calculation: 10%.
Based on the above information, the following tables outlines the net present value calculation of the two options.
Option 1:
| Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
| 0 | Installation Cost | $ 20,000.00 | 1.00 | $ 20,000.00 |
| 1 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.91 | $ 1,363.64 |
| 2 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.83 | $ 1,239.67 |
| 3 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.75 | $ 1,126.97 |
| 4 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.68 | $ 1,024.52 |
| 5 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.62 | $ 931.38 |
| 5 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.62 | $ 931.38 |
| 6 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.56 | $ 846.71 |
| 7 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.51 | $ 769.74 |
| 8 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.47 | $ 699.76 |
| 9 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.42 | $ 636.15 |
| 10 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.39 | $ 578.31 |
| 11 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.35 | $ 525.74 |
| 12 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.32 | $ 477.95 |
| 13 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.29 | $ 434.50 |
| 14 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.26 | $ 395.00 |
| 15 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.24 | $ 359.09 |
| 16 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.22 | $ 326.44 |
| 17 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.20 | $ 296.77 |
| 18 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.18 | $ 269.79 |
| 19 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.16 | $ 245.26 |
| 20 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.15 | $ 222.97 |
| 21 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.14 | $ 202.70 |
| 22 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.12 | $ 184.27 |
| 23 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.11 | $ 167.52 |
| 24 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.10 | $ 152.29 |
| 25 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.09 | $ 138.44 |
| 26 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.08 | $ 125.86 |
| 27 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.08 | $ 114.42 |
| 28 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.07 | $ 104.02 |
| 29 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.06 | $ 94.56 |
| 30 | Operating costs | $ 1,500.00 | 0.06 | $ 85.96 |
| Net cash outflow | 35,071.75 |
Option 2:
| Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
| 0 | Installation Cost | $ 15,000.00 | 1.00 | $ 15,000.00 |
| 1 | Operating costs | $ 1,000.00 | 0.91 | $ 909.09 |
| 2 | Operating costs | $ 1,000.00 | 0.83 | $ 826.45 |
| 3 | Operating costs | $ 1,000.00 | 0.75 | $ 751.31 |
| 4 | Operating costs | $ 1,000.00 | 0.68 | $ 683.01 |
| 5 | Operating costs | $ 1,000.00 | 0.62 | $ 620.92 |
| 5 | Operating costs | $ 1,000.00 | 0.62 | $ 620.92 |
| 5 | Installation Cost | $ 15,000.00 | 0.62 | $ 9,313.82 |
| 6 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.56 | $ 1,128.95 |
| 7 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.51 | $ 1,026.32 |
| 8 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.47 | $ 933.01 |
| 9 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.42 | $ 848.20 |
| 10 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.39 | $ 771.09 |
| 11 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.35 | $ 700.99 |
| 12 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.32 | $ 637.26 |
| 13 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.29 | $ 579.33 |
| 14 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.26 | $ 526.66 |
| 15 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.24 | $ 478.78 |
| 16 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.22 | $ 435.26 |
| 17 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.20 | $ 395.69 |
| 18 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.18 | $ 359.72 |
| 19 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.16 | $ 327.02 |
| 20 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.15 | $ 297.29 |
| 21 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.14 | $ 270.26 |
| 22 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.12 | $ 245.69 |
| 23 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.11 | $ 223.36 |
| 24 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.10 | $ 203.05 |
| 25 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.09 | $ 184.59 |
| 26 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.08 | $ 167.81 |
| 27 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.08 | $ 152.56 |
| 28 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.07 | $ 138.69 |
| 29 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.06 | $ 126.08 |
| 30 | Operating costs | $ 2,000.00 | 0.06 | $ 114.62 |
| Net cash outflow | 39,997.78 |
Net present value is the difference of Sum of Present values of cash inflows and Sum of Present values of cash outflows. If the value is positive then the project may be accepted. While evaluation of two or more alternatives takes place, then the proposal with the higher net present value may be selected since it results in a greater cash inflow over the duration of the project.
In the given scenario, Present values are calculated by calculating the present values of cash outflows such as installation cost and operating cost.
Present value factor is calculated as 1/1.10 ^ N where N is the year of operation of the refrigerator.
Deferment of capital expenditure to Year 5 in case of Option 2 results in a higher overall cash outflow due to increase in the annual operating costs from years 6-30. This is owing to the present value factor.
Conclusion:
Hence the Option to be implemented is Option 1 since it results in lower overall cash outflow.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
General Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? C
It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives.
Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.
For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Chapter 5 Solutions
ENGINEERING ECO ANALYSIS W/STUDY GUIDE
Ch. 5 - Prob. 1QTCCh. 5 - Prob. 2QTCCh. 5 - Prob. 3QTCCh. 5 - Prob. 1PCh. 5 - Prob. 2PCh. 5 - Prob. 3PCh. 5 - Prob. 4PCh. 5 - Prob. 5PCh. 5 - Prob. 6PCh. 5 - Prob. 7P
Ch. 5 - Prob. 8PCh. 5 - Prob. 9PCh. 5 - Prob. 10PCh. 5 - Prob. 11PCh. 5 - Prob. 12PCh. 5 - Prob. 13PCh. 5 - Prob. 14PCh. 5 - Prob. 15PCh. 5 - Prob. 16PCh. 5 - Prob. 17PCh. 5 - Prob. 18PCh. 5 - Prob. 19PCh. 5 - Prob. 20PCh. 5 - Prob. 21PCh. 5 - Prob. 22PCh. 5 - Prob. 23PCh. 5 - Prob. 24PCh. 5 - Prob. 25PCh. 5 - Prob. 26PCh. 5 - Prob. 27PCh. 5 - Prob. 28PCh. 5 - Prob. 29PCh. 5 - Prob. 30PCh. 5 - Prob. 31PCh. 5 - Prob. 32PCh. 5 - Prob. 33PCh. 5 - Prob. 34PCh. 5 - Prob. 35PCh. 5 - Prob. 36PCh. 5 - Prob. 37PCh. 5 - Prob. 38PCh. 5 - Prob. 39PCh. 5 - Prob. 40PCh. 5 - Prob. 41PCh. 5 - Prob. 42PCh. 5 - Prob. 43PCh. 5 - Prob. 44PCh. 5 - Prob. 45PCh. 5 - Prob. 46PCh. 5 - Prob. 47PCh. 5 - Prob. 48PCh. 5 - Prob. 49PCh. 5 - Prob. 50PCh. 5 - Prob. 51PCh. 5 - Prob. 52PCh. 5 - Prob. 53PCh. 5 - Prob. 54PCh. 5 - Prob. 55PCh. 5 - Prob. 56PCh. 5 - Prob. 57PCh. 5 - Prob. 58PCh. 5 - Prob. 59PCh. 5 - Prob. 60PCh. 5 - Prob. 61PCh. 5 - Prob. 62PCh. 5 - Prob. 63PCh. 5 - Prob. 64PCh. 5 - Prob. 65PCh. 5 - Prob. 66PCh. 5 - Prob. 67PCh. 5 - Prob. 68PCh. 5 - Prob. 69PCh. 5 - Prob. 70PCh. 5 - Prob. 71PCh. 5 - Prob. 72PCh. 5 - Prob. 73PCh. 5 - Prob. 74PCh. 5 - Prob. 75PCh. 5 - Prob. 76PCh. 5 - Prob. 77PCh. 5 - Prob. 78PCh. 5 - Prob. 79PCh. 5 - Prob. 80PCh. 5 - Prob. 81PCh. 5 - Prob. 82PCh. 5 - Prob. 83PCh. 5 - Prob. 84PCh. 5 - Prob. 85PCh. 5 - Prob. 86PCh. 5 - Prob. 87PCh. 5 - Prob. 88PCh. 5 - Prob. 89PCh. 5 - Prob. 90PCh. 5 - Prob. 91PCh. 5 - Prob. 92PCh. 5 - Prob. 93PCh. 5 - Prob. 94PCh. 5 - Prob. 95PCh. 5 - Prob. 96PCh. 5 - Prob. 97PCh. 5 - Prob. 98PCh. 5 - Prob. 99PCh. 5 - Prob. 100PCh. 5 - Prob. 101P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- For the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forward
- Suppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forwardO’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education