ENGINEERING ECO ANALYSIS W/STUDY GUIDE
13th Edition
ISBN: 9780190693053
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 30P
To determine
Which of the three alternative refrigerators should be purchased.
Expert Solution & Answer
Answer to Problem 30P
Equipment to be purchased is Foxhill instrument, based on
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Installation Costs in Year 0:
Foxhill Instrument $35,000
Quicksilver $40,000
Almaden $100,000
Annual Energy costs for Years 1-20:
Foxhill Instrument $8,000
Quicksilver $7,000
Almaden $2,000
Annual Income:
Foxhill Instrument $2,000
Quicksilver $2,200
Almaden $3,500
Salvage Value in year 20:
Foxhill Instrument $20,000
Quicksilver 0
Almaden 0.
Based on the above information, the following tables outlines the net present value calculation of the equipment of Foxhill Instrument, Quicksilver, and Almaden.
Foxhill Instrument:
| Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
| 0 | Installation Cost | $35,000.00 | 1 | $35,000.00 |
| 1 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.9091 | $5,454.55 |
| 2 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.8264 | $4,958.68 |
| 3 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.7513 | $4,507.89 |
| 4 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.6830 | $4,098.08 |
| 5 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.6209 | $3,725.53 |
| 6 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.5645 | $3,386.84 |
| 7 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.5132 | $3,078.95 |
| 8 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.4665 | $2,799.04 |
| 9 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.4241 | $2,544.59 |
| 10 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.3855 | $2,313.26 |
| 11 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.3505 | $2,102.96 |
| 12 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.3186 | $1,911.78 |
| 13 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2897 | $1,737.99 |
| 14 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2633 | $1,579.99 |
| 15 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2394 | $1,436.35 |
| 16 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2176 | $1,305.77 |
| 17 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1978 | $1,187.07 |
| 18 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1799 | $1,079.15 |
| 19 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1635 | $981.05 |
| 20 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1486 | $891.86 |
| 20 | Salvage Value | ($20,000.00) | 0.1486 | ($2,972.87) |
| Net cash outflow | $83,108.51 |
Quicksilver:
| Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
| 0 | Installation Cost | $40,000.00 | 1.0000 | $40,000.00 |
| 1 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.9091 | $4,363.64 |
| 2 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.8264 | $3,966.94 |
| 3 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.7513 | $3,606.31 |
| 4 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.6830 | $3,278.46 |
| 5 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.6209 | $2,980.42 |
| 5 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.6209 | $2,980.42 |
| 6 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.5645 | $2,709.47 |
| 7 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.5132 | $2,463.16 |
| 8 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.4665 | $2,239.24 |
| 9 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.4241 | $2,035.67 |
| 10 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.3855 | $1,850.61 |
| 11 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.3505 | $1,682.37 |
| 12 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.3186 | $1,529.43 |
| 13 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2897 | $1,390.39 |
| 14 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2633 | $1,263.99 |
| 15 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2394 | $1,149.08 |
| 16 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2176 | $1,044.62 |
| 17 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1978 | $949.65 |
| 18 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1799 | $863.32 |
| 19 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1635 | $784.84 |
| 20 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1486 | $713.49 |
| 20 | Salvage Value | 0 | 0.1486 | $0.00 |
| Net cash outflow | $83,845.53 |
Almaden:
| Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
| 0 | Installation Cost | $100,000.00 | 1.0000 | $100,000.00 |
| 1 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.9091 | ($1,363.64) |
| 2 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.8264 | ($1,239.67) |
| 3 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.7513 | ($1,126.97) |
| 4 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.6830 | ($1,024.52) |
| 5 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.6209 | ($931.38) |
| 5 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.6209 | ($931.38) |
| 6 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.5645 | ($846.71) |
| 7 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.5132 | ($769.74) |
| 8 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.4665 | ($699.76) |
| 9 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.4241 | ($636.15) |
| 10 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.3855 | ($578.31) |
| 11 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.3505 | ($525.74) |
| 12 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.3186 | ($477.95) |
| 13 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2897 | ($434.50) |
| 14 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2633 | ($395.00) |
| 15 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2394 | ($359.09) |
| 16 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2176 | ($326.44) |
| 17 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1978 | ($296.77) |
| 18 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1799 | ($269.79) |
| 19 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1635 | ($245.26) |
| 20 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1486 | ($222.97) |
| 20 | Salvage Value | $ - | 0.1486 | $0.00 |
| Net cash outflow | $86,298.27 |
Net present value is the difference of Sum of Present values of cash inflows and Sum of Present values of cash outflows. If the value is positive then the project may be accepted. While evaluation of two or more alternatives takes place, then the proposal with the higher net present value may be selected since it results in a greater
In the given scenario, Present values are calculated by calculating the present values of cash inflows in the form of salvage value and cash outflows such as installation cost and operating cost.
In case of Foxhill, Installation Cost is $35,000, Operating costs less Revenue is $6,000 i.e. Operating costs of $8,000 less Revenues of $2,000 and Salvage value is $20,000. In case of Quicksilver, Installation Cost is $40,000, Operating costs less Revenue is $4,800 i.e. Operating costs of $7,000 less Revenues of $2,200 and Salvage value is $0. In case of Almaden, Installation Cost is $100,000, Operating costs less Revenue is ($1,500) i.e. Operating costs of $2,000 less Revenues of $3,500 and Salvage value is $0.
Present value factor is calculated as 1/1.10 ^ N where N is the year of operation of the equipment.
Conclusion:
Hence the equipment with the lowest cash outflows over a period of 20 years is selected.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
How did Jennifer Lopez use free enterprise to become successful ?
An actuary analyzes a company’s annual personal auto claims, M and annual commercialauto claims, N . The analysis reveals that V ar(M ) = 1600, V ar(N ) = 900, and thecorrelation between M and N is ρ = 0.64. Compute V ar(M + N ).
Don't used hand raiting
Chapter 5 Solutions
ENGINEERING ECO ANALYSIS W/STUDY GUIDE
Ch. 5 - Prob. 1QTCCh. 5 - Prob. 2QTCCh. 5 - Prob. 3QTCCh. 5 - Prob. 1PCh. 5 - Prob. 2PCh. 5 - Prob. 3PCh. 5 - Prob. 4PCh. 5 - Prob. 5PCh. 5 - Prob. 6PCh. 5 - Prob. 7P
Ch. 5 - Prob. 8PCh. 5 - Prob. 9PCh. 5 - Prob. 10PCh. 5 - Prob. 11PCh. 5 - Prob. 12PCh. 5 - Prob. 13PCh. 5 - Prob. 14PCh. 5 - Prob. 15PCh. 5 - Prob. 16PCh. 5 - Prob. 17PCh. 5 - Prob. 18PCh. 5 - Prob. 19PCh. 5 - Prob. 20PCh. 5 - Prob. 21PCh. 5 - Prob. 22PCh. 5 - Prob. 23PCh. 5 - Prob. 24PCh. 5 - Prob. 25PCh. 5 - Prob. 26PCh. 5 - Prob. 27PCh. 5 - Prob. 28PCh. 5 - Prob. 29PCh. 5 - Prob. 30PCh. 5 - Prob. 31PCh. 5 - Prob. 32PCh. 5 - Prob. 33PCh. 5 - Prob. 34PCh. 5 - Prob. 35PCh. 5 - Prob. 36PCh. 5 - Prob. 37PCh. 5 - Prob. 38PCh. 5 - Prob. 39PCh. 5 - Prob. 40PCh. 5 - Prob. 41PCh. 5 - Prob. 42PCh. 5 - Prob. 43PCh. 5 - Prob. 44PCh. 5 - Prob. 45PCh. 5 - Prob. 46PCh. 5 - Prob. 47PCh. 5 - Prob. 48PCh. 5 - Prob. 49PCh. 5 - Prob. 50PCh. 5 - Prob. 51PCh. 5 - Prob. 52PCh. 5 - Prob. 53PCh. 5 - Prob. 54PCh. 5 - Prob. 55PCh. 5 - Prob. 56PCh. 5 - Prob. 57PCh. 5 - Prob. 58PCh. 5 - Prob. 59PCh. 5 - Prob. 60PCh. 5 - Prob. 61PCh. 5 - Prob. 62PCh. 5 - Prob. 63PCh. 5 - Prob. 64PCh. 5 - Prob. 65PCh. 5 - Prob. 66PCh. 5 - Prob. 67PCh. 5 - Prob. 68PCh. 5 - Prob. 69PCh. 5 - Prob. 70PCh. 5 - Prob. 71PCh. 5 - Prob. 72PCh. 5 - Prob. 73PCh. 5 - Prob. 74PCh. 5 - Prob. 75PCh. 5 - Prob. 76PCh. 5 - Prob. 77PCh. 5 - Prob. 78PCh. 5 - Prob. 79PCh. 5 - Prob. 80PCh. 5 - Prob. 81PCh. 5 - Prob. 82PCh. 5 - Prob. 83PCh. 5 - Prob. 84PCh. 5 - Prob. 85PCh. 5 - Prob. 86PCh. 5 - Prob. 87PCh. 5 - Prob. 88PCh. 5 - Prob. 89PCh. 5 - Prob. 90PCh. 5 - Prob. 91PCh. 5 - Prob. 92PCh. 5 - Prob. 93PCh. 5 - Prob. 94PCh. 5 - Prob. 95PCh. 5 - Prob. 96PCh. 5 - Prob. 97PCh. 5 - Prob. 98PCh. 5 - Prob. 99PCh. 5 - Prob. 100PCh. 5 - Prob. 101P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Answer in step by step with explanation. Don't use Ai.arrow_forwardUse the figure below to answer the following question. Let I represent Income when healthy, let I represent income when ill. Let E [I] represent expected income for a given probability (p) of falling ill. Utility у в ULI income Is есте IM The actuarially fair & partial contract is represented by Point X × OB A Yarrow_forwardSuppose that there is a 25% chance Riju is injured and earns $180,000, and a 75% chance she stays healthy and will earn $900,000. Suppose further that her utility function is the following: U = (Income) ³. Riju's utility if she earns $180,000 is _ and her utility if she earns $900,000 is. X 56.46; 169.38 56.46; 96.55 96.55; 56.46 40.00; 200.00 169.38; 56.46arrow_forward
- Use the figure below to answer the following question. Let là represent Income when healthy, let Is represent income when ill. Let E[I], represent expected income for a given probability (p) of falling ill. Utility & B естве IH S Point D represents ☑ actuarially fair & full contract actuarially fair & partial contract O actuarially unfair & full contract uninsurance incomearrow_forwardSuppose that there is a 25% chance Riju is injured and earns $180,000, and a 75% chance she stays healthy and will earn $900,000. Suppose further that her utility function is the following: U = (Income). Riju is risk. She will prefer (given the same expected income). averse; no insurance to actuarially fair and full insurance lover; actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance averse; actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance neutral; he will be indifferent between actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance lover; no insurance to actuarially fair and full insurancearrow_forward19. (20 points in total) Suppose that the market demand curve is p = 80 - 8Qd, where p is the price per unit and Qd is the number of units demanded per week, and the market supply curve is p = 5+7Qs, where Q5 is the quantity supplied per week. a. b. C. d. e. Calculate the equilibrium price and quantity for a competitive market in which there is no market failure. Draw a diagram that includes the demand and supply curves, the values of the vertical- axis intercepts, and the competitive equilibrium quantity and price. Label the curves, axes and areas. Calculate both the marginal willingness to pay and the total willingness to pay for the equilibrium quantity. Calculate both the marginal cost of the equilibrium quantity and variable cost of producing the equilibrium quantity. Calculate the total surplus. How is the value of total surplus related to your calculations in parts c and d?arrow_forward
- Sam's profit is maximized when he produces shirts. When he does this, the marginal cost of the last shirt he produces is , which is than the price Sam receives for each shirt he sells. The marginal cost of producing an additional shirt (that is, one more shirt than would maximize his profit) is , which is than the price Sam receives for each shirt he sells. Therefore, Sam's profit-maximizing quantity corresponds to the intersection of the curves. Because Sam is a price taker, this last condition can also be written as .arrow_forwardWhy must total spending be equal to total income in an economy? Total income plus total spending equals total output. The value-added measurement of GDP shows this is true. Every dollar that someone spends is a dollar of income for someone else. all of the abovearrow_forwardLabor Market Data Price $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 3,000,000 6,000,000 9,000,000 12,000,000 15,000,000 Qd 15,000,000 12,000,000 9,000,000 6,000,000 3,000,000 Price $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 + +- x- 3 6 Do + + F 9 12 15 Quantity (In millions) Area of a triangle = 1/2* base *height Market Efficiency & Total Surplus Worth Publishers SCENARIO: The state government is considering raising the minimum wage from $15 per hour to $20 per hour over the next 3 years. As an economic advisor to the governor, you have been asked to provide a recommendation on whether the minimum wage should be increased based on economic theory. Consider the labor market data provided. Prepare a brief report that: 1. Explains whether the labor market is currently efficient at the equilibrium wage of $15 per hour. How would you know? At equilibrium, what (dollar amount) is the Total Surplus this market provides? Show your rationale with numbers. 2. Analyzes the impact on total surplus in the market if the minimum wage is raised…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education