Which of the three alternative refrigerators should be purchased.
Answer to Problem 30P
Equipment to be purchased is Foxhill instrument, based on
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Installation Costs in Year 0:
Foxhill Instrument $35,000
Quicksilver $40,000
Almaden $100,000
Annual Energy costs for Years 1-20:
Foxhill Instrument $8,000
Quicksilver $7,000
Almaden $2,000
Annual Income:
Foxhill Instrument $2,000
Quicksilver $2,200
Almaden $3,500
Salvage Value in year 20:
Foxhill Instrument $20,000
Quicksilver 0
Almaden 0.
Based on the above information, the following tables outlines the net present value calculation of the equipment of Foxhill Instrument, Quicksilver, and Almaden.
Foxhill Instrument:
Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
0 | Installation Cost | $35,000.00 | 1 | $35,000.00 |
1 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.9091 | $5,454.55 |
2 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.8264 | $4,958.68 |
3 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.7513 | $4,507.89 |
4 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.6830 | $4,098.08 |
5 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.6209 | $3,725.53 |
6 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.5645 | $3,386.84 |
7 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.5132 | $3,078.95 |
8 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.4665 | $2,799.04 |
9 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.4241 | $2,544.59 |
10 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.3855 | $2,313.26 |
11 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.3505 | $2,102.96 |
12 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.3186 | $1,911.78 |
13 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2897 | $1,737.99 |
14 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2633 | $1,579.99 |
15 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2394 | $1,436.35 |
16 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2176 | $1,305.77 |
17 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1978 | $1,187.07 |
18 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1799 | $1,079.15 |
19 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1635 | $981.05 |
20 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1486 | $891.86 |
20 | Salvage Value | ($20,000.00) | 0.1486 | ($2,972.87) |
Net cash outflow | $83,108.51 |
Quicksilver:
Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
0 | Installation Cost | $40,000.00 | 1.0000 | $40,000.00 |
1 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.9091 | $4,363.64 |
2 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.8264 | $3,966.94 |
3 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.7513 | $3,606.31 |
4 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.6830 | $3,278.46 |
5 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.6209 | $2,980.42 |
5 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.6209 | $2,980.42 |
6 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.5645 | $2,709.47 |
7 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.5132 | $2,463.16 |
8 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.4665 | $2,239.24 |
9 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.4241 | $2,035.67 |
10 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.3855 | $1,850.61 |
11 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.3505 | $1,682.37 |
12 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.3186 | $1,529.43 |
13 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2897 | $1,390.39 |
14 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2633 | $1,263.99 |
15 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2394 | $1,149.08 |
16 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2176 | $1,044.62 |
17 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1978 | $949.65 |
18 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1799 | $863.32 |
19 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1635 | $784.84 |
20 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1486 | $713.49 |
20 | Salvage Value | 0 | 0.1486 | $0.00 |
Net cash outflow | $83,845.53 |
Almaden:
Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
0 | Installation Cost | $100,000.00 | 1.0000 | $100,000.00 |
1 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.9091 | ($1,363.64) |
2 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.8264 | ($1,239.67) |
3 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.7513 | ($1,126.97) |
4 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.6830 | ($1,024.52) |
5 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.6209 | ($931.38) |
5 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.6209 | ($931.38) |
6 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.5645 | ($846.71) |
7 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.5132 | ($769.74) |
8 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.4665 | ($699.76) |
9 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.4241 | ($636.15) |
10 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.3855 | ($578.31) |
11 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.3505 | ($525.74) |
12 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.3186 | ($477.95) |
13 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2897 | ($434.50) |
14 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2633 | ($395.00) |
15 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2394 | ($359.09) |
16 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2176 | ($326.44) |
17 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1978 | ($296.77) |
18 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1799 | ($269.79) |
19 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1635 | ($245.26) |
20 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1486 | ($222.97) |
20 | Salvage Value | $ - | 0.1486 | $0.00 |
Net cash outflow | $86,298.27 |
Net present value is the difference of Sum of Present values of cash inflows and Sum of Present values of cash outflows. If the value is positive then the project may be accepted. While evaluation of two or more alternatives takes place, then the proposal with the higher net present value may be selected since it results in a greater
In the given scenario, Present values are calculated by calculating the present values of cash inflows in the form of salvage value and cash outflows such as installation cost and operating cost.
In case of Foxhill, Installation Cost is $35,000, Operating costs less Revenue is $6,000 i.e. Operating costs of $8,000 less Revenues of $2,000 and Salvage value is $20,000. In case of Quicksilver, Installation Cost is $40,000, Operating costs less Revenue is $4,800 i.e. Operating costs of $7,000 less Revenues of $2,200 and Salvage value is $0. In case of Almaden, Installation Cost is $100,000, Operating costs less Revenue is ($1,500) i.e. Operating costs of $2,000 less Revenues of $3,500 and Salvage value is $0.
Present value factor is calculated as 1/1.10 ^ N where N is the year of operation of the equipment.
Conclusion:
Hence the equipment with the lowest cash outflows over a period of 20 years is selected.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 5 Solutions
ENGINEERING ECO ANALYSIS W/STUDY GUIDE
- The Firm's Output Decision (Study Plan 12.2) Use the following table to work Problems 4 to 6. Pat's Pizza Kitchen is a price taker. Its costs are Output (pizzas per hour) Total cost (dollars per hour) 0 10 1 21 2 30 3 41 4 54 5 69 4. Calculate Pat's profit-maximizing output and economic profit if the market price is (i) $14 a pizza. (ii) $12 a pizza. (iii) $10 a pizza. 5. What is Pat's shutdown point and what is Pat's economic profit if it shuts down temporarily? 6. Derive Pat's supply curve.arrow_forwardUse the following table to work Problems 27 and 28. ProPainters hires students at $250 a week to paint houses. It leases equipment at $500 a week. The table sets out its total product schedule. Labor (students) 1 Output (houses painted per week) 2 23 5 3 9 4 12 5 14 6 15 27. If ProPainters paints 12 houses a week, calculate its total cost, average total cost, and marginal cost. At what output is average total cost a minimum? 28. Explain why the gap between ProPainters' total cost and total variable cost is the same no matter how many houses are painted.arrow_forwardUse the following table to work Problems 17 to 20. The table shows the production function of Jackie's Canoe Rides. Labor Output (rides per day) (workers per day) Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 3 Plant 4 10 20 40 55 65 20 40 60 75 85 30 65 75 90 100 40 75 85 100 110 Canoes 10 20 30 40 Jackie's pays $100 a day for each canoe it rents and $50 a day for each canoe operator it hires. 19. a. On Jackie's LRAC curve, what is the average cost of producing 40, 75, and 85 rides a week? b. What is Jackie's minimum efficient scale?arrow_forward
- Not use ai pleasearrow_forward1. Riaz has a limited income and consumes only Apple and Bread. His current consumption choice is 3 apples and 5 bread. The price of apple is $3 each, and the price of bread is $2.5 each. The last apple added 5 units to Sadid's utility, while the last bread added 7 units. Is Riaz making the utility-maximizing choice? Why or why not? Do you suggest any adjustment in Riaz's consumption bundle? Why or why not? Give reasons in support of your answer. State the condition for a consumer's utility maximizing choice and illustrate graphically. 2. Consider the following table of long-run total costs for three different firms: Quantity Total Cost ($) Firm A Firm B Firm C 1 60 11 21 2 70 24 34 3 80 39 49 4 90 56 66 5 100 75 85 6 110 96 106 7 120 119 129 Does each of these firms experience economies of scale or diseconomies of scale? Explain your answer with necessary calculations.arrow_forwardRiaz has a limited income and consumes only Apple and Bread. His current consumption choice is 3 apples and 5 bread. The price of apple is $3 each, and the price of bread is $2.5 each. The last apple added 5 units to Sadid's utility, while the last bread added 7 units. Is Riaz making the utility-maximizing choice? Why or why not? Do you suggest any adjustment in Riaz's consumption bundle? Why or why not? Give reasons in support of your answer.State the condition for a consumer's utility maximizing choice and illustrate graphically.arrow_forward
- 1. Riaz has a limited income and consumes only Apple and Bread. His current consumption choice is 3 apples and 5 bread. The price of apple is $3 each, and the price of bread is $2.5 each. The last apple added 5 units to Sadid's utility, while the last bread added 7 units. Is Riaz making the utility-maximizing choice? Why or why not? Do you suggest any adjustment in Riaz's consumption bundle? Why or why not? Give reasons in support of your answer. State the condition for a consumer's utility maximizing choice and illustrate graphically.arrow_forward1. Riaz has a limited income and consumes only Apple and Bread. His current consumption choice is 3 apples and 5 bread. The price of apple is $3 each, and the price of bread is $2.5 each. The last apple added 5 units to Sadid's utility, while the last bread added 7 units. Is Riaz making the utility-maximizing choice? Why or why not? Do you suggest any adjustment in Riaz's consumption bundle? Why or why not? Give reasons in support of your answer. State the condition for a consumer's utility maximizing choice and illustrate graphically.arrow_forward2. Consider the following table of long-run total costs for three different firms: Quantity Total Cost ($) Firm A Firm B Firm C 1 60 11 21 2 70 24 34 3 80 39 49 4 90 56 66 5 100 75 85 6 110 96 106 7 120 119 129 Does each of these firms experience economies of scale or diseconomies of scale? Explain your answer with necessary calculations.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education