Engineering Economic Analysis
13th Edition
ISBN: 9780190296902
Author: Donald G. Newnan, Ted G. Eschenbach, Jerome P. Lavelle
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 30P
To determine
Which of the three alternative refrigerators should be purchased.
Expert Solution & Answer
Answer to Problem 30P
Equipment to be purchased is Foxhill instrument, based on
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Installation Costs in Year 0:
Foxhill Instrument $35,000
Quicksilver $40,000
Almaden $100,000
Annual Energy costs for Years 1-20:
Foxhill Instrument $8,000
Quicksilver $7,000
Almaden $2,000
Annual Income:
Foxhill Instrument $2,000
Quicksilver $2,200
Almaden $3,500
Salvage Value in year 20:
Foxhill Instrument $20,000
Quicksilver 0
Almaden 0.
Based on the above information, the following tables outlines the net present value calculation of the equipment of Foxhill Instrument, Quicksilver, and Almaden.
Foxhill Instrument:
| Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
| 0 | Installation Cost | $35,000.00 | 1 | $35,000.00 |
| 1 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.9091 | $5,454.55 |
| 2 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.8264 | $4,958.68 |
| 3 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.7513 | $4,507.89 |
| 4 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.6830 | $4,098.08 |
| 5 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.6209 | $3,725.53 |
| 6 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.5645 | $3,386.84 |
| 7 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.5132 | $3,078.95 |
| 8 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.4665 | $2,799.04 |
| 9 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.4241 | $2,544.59 |
| 10 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.3855 | $2,313.26 |
| 11 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.3505 | $2,102.96 |
| 12 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.3186 | $1,911.78 |
| 13 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2897 | $1,737.99 |
| 14 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2633 | $1,579.99 |
| 15 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2394 | $1,436.35 |
| 16 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.2176 | $1,305.77 |
| 17 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1978 | $1,187.07 |
| 18 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1799 | $1,079.15 |
| 19 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1635 | $981.05 |
| 20 | Operating costs less Revenue | $6,000.00 | 0.1486 | $891.86 |
| 20 | Salvage Value | ($20,000.00) | 0.1486 | ($2,972.87) |
| Net cash outflow | $83,108.51 |
Quicksilver:
| Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
| 0 | Installation Cost | $40,000.00 | 1.0000 | $40,000.00 |
| 1 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.9091 | $4,363.64 |
| 2 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.8264 | $3,966.94 |
| 3 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.7513 | $3,606.31 |
| 4 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.6830 | $3,278.46 |
| 5 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.6209 | $2,980.42 |
| 5 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.6209 | $2,980.42 |
| 6 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.5645 | $2,709.47 |
| 7 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.5132 | $2,463.16 |
| 8 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.4665 | $2,239.24 |
| 9 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.4241 | $2,035.67 |
| 10 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.3855 | $1,850.61 |
| 11 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.3505 | $1,682.37 |
| 12 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.3186 | $1,529.43 |
| 13 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2897 | $1,390.39 |
| 14 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2633 | $1,263.99 |
| 15 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2394 | $1,149.08 |
| 16 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.2176 | $1,044.62 |
| 17 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1978 | $949.65 |
| 18 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1799 | $863.32 |
| 19 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1635 | $784.84 |
| 20 | Operating costs less Revenue | $4,800.00 | 0.1486 | $713.49 |
| 20 | Salvage Value | 0 | 0.1486 | $0.00 |
| Net cash outflow | $83,845.53 |
Almaden:
| Year | Particulars | Cash flow | Present value Factor @10% | Present value |
| 0 | Installation Cost | $100,000.00 | 1.0000 | $100,000.00 |
| 1 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.9091 | ($1,363.64) |
| 2 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.8264 | ($1,239.67) |
| 3 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.7513 | ($1,126.97) |
| 4 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.6830 | ($1,024.52) |
| 5 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.6209 | ($931.38) |
| 5 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.6209 | ($931.38) |
| 6 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.5645 | ($846.71) |
| 7 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.5132 | ($769.74) |
| 8 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.4665 | ($699.76) |
| 9 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.4241 | ($636.15) |
| 10 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.3855 | ($578.31) |
| 11 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.3505 | ($525.74) |
| 12 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.3186 | ($477.95) |
| 13 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2897 | ($434.50) |
| 14 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2633 | ($395.00) |
| 15 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2394 | ($359.09) |
| 16 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.2176 | ($326.44) |
| 17 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1978 | ($296.77) |
| 18 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1799 | ($269.79) |
| 19 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1635 | ($245.26) |
| 20 | Operating costs less Revenue | ($1,500.00) | 0.1486 | ($222.97) |
| 20 | Salvage Value | $ - | 0.1486 | $0.00 |
| Net cash outflow | $86,298.27 |
Net present value is the difference of Sum of Present values of cash inflows and Sum of Present values of cash outflows. If the value is positive then the project may be accepted. While evaluation of two or more alternatives takes place, then the proposal with the higher net present value may be selected since it results in a greater
In the given scenario, Present values are calculated by calculating the present values of cash inflows in the form of salvage value and cash outflows such as installation cost and operating cost.
In case of Foxhill, Installation Cost is $35,000, Operating costs less Revenue is $6,000 i.e. Operating costs of $8,000 less Revenues of $2,000 and Salvage value is $20,000. In case of Quicksilver, Installation Cost is $40,000, Operating costs less Revenue is $4,800 i.e. Operating costs of $7,000 less Revenues of $2,200 and Salvage value is $0. In case of Almaden, Installation Cost is $100,000, Operating costs less Revenue is ($1,500) i.e. Operating costs of $2,000 less Revenues of $3,500 and Salvage value is $0.
Present value factor is calculated as 1/1.10 ^ N where N is the year of operation of the equipment.
Conclusion:
Hence the equipment with the lowest cash outflows over a period of 20 years is selected.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Assume that an economy has an inflationary gap. Compare the use of fiscal policy with the use of monetary policy to remove the gap. Assume a closed economy. Use graphs to illustrate.
Suppose Person A is looking for a health insurance plan on Oregon's health insurance marketplace and they find one with the following details:
Monthly Premium: $331
Deductible: $5,000
Primary care visit to treat injury or illness: $35 copay
Imaging (CT/PET Scans MRIs): 40% coinsurance after deductible
Ambulance: 40% coinsurance after deductible
Inpatient hospital stay: 40% coinsurance after deductible
Suppose further that Person A purchases this plan and it takes effect in January 2022.
The cost Person A pays per month for this health insurance is equal to _. Person A must pay. before coinsurance kicks in.
0000
$35; $5,000
$35; $331
$331; $5,000
$331; $35
Multiple Choice 1 point
Suppose Person A is looking for a health insurance plan on Oregon's health insurance marketplace and you find one with the following details:
Monthly Premium: $331
Deductible: $5,000
Primary care visit to treat injury or illness: $35 copay
Imaging (CT/PET Scans MRIs): 40% coinsurance after deductible
Ambulance:…
Use the figure below to answer the following question. Point X and Y represent two non-ideal contracts that the individual is faced with buying. From this information, you can
conclude that if given the option between points B and Y the individual would prefer:
Utility
A
у в
0000
UKI)
E[Bp IH
point B- the actuarially fair and full contract
point Y-the actuarially unfair but full contract
point Y- the actuarially fair, but partial contract
point B- the actuarially fair, but partial contract
income
Chapter 5 Solutions
Engineering Economic Analysis
Ch. 5 - Prob. 1QTCCh. 5 - Prob. 2QTCCh. 5 - Prob. 3QTCCh. 5 - Prob. 1PCh. 5 - Prob. 2PCh. 5 - Prob. 3PCh. 5 - Prob. 4PCh. 5 - Prob. 5PCh. 5 - Prob. 6PCh. 5 - Prob. 7P
Ch. 5 - Prob. 8PCh. 5 - Prob. 9PCh. 5 - Prob. 10PCh. 5 - Prob. 11PCh. 5 - Prob. 12PCh. 5 - Prob. 13PCh. 5 - Prob. 14PCh. 5 - Prob. 15PCh. 5 - Prob. 16PCh. 5 - Prob. 17PCh. 5 - Prob. 18PCh. 5 - Prob. 19PCh. 5 - Prob. 20PCh. 5 - Prob. 21PCh. 5 - Prob. 22PCh. 5 - Prob. 23PCh. 5 - Prob. 24PCh. 5 - Prob. 25PCh. 5 - Prob. 26PCh. 5 - Prob. 27PCh. 5 - Prob. 28PCh. 5 - Prob. 29PCh. 5 - Prob. 30PCh. 5 - Prob. 31PCh. 5 - Prob. 32PCh. 5 - Prob. 33PCh. 5 - Prob. 34PCh. 5 - Prob. 35PCh. 5 - Prob. 36PCh. 5 - Prob. 37PCh. 5 - Prob. 38PCh. 5 - Prob. 39PCh. 5 - Prob. 40PCh. 5 - Prob. 41PCh. 5 - Prob. 42PCh. 5 - Prob. 43PCh. 5 - Prob. 44PCh. 5 - Prob. 45PCh. 5 - Prob. 46PCh. 5 - Prob. 47PCh. 5 - Prob. 48PCh. 5 - Prob. 49PCh. 5 - Prob. 50PCh. 5 - Prob. 51PCh. 5 - Prob. 52PCh. 5 - Prob. 53PCh. 5 - Prob. 54PCh. 5 - Prob. 55PCh. 5 - Prob. 56PCh. 5 - Prob. 57PCh. 5 - Prob. 58PCh. 5 - Prob. 59PCh. 5 - Prob. 60PCh. 5 - Prob. 61PCh. 5 - Prob. 62PCh. 5 - Prob. 63PCh. 5 - Prob. 64PCh. 5 - Prob. 65PCh. 5 - Prob. 66PCh. 5 - Prob. 67PCh. 5 - Prob. 68PCh. 5 - Prob. 69PCh. 5 - Prob. 70PCh. 5 - Prob. 71PCh. 5 - Prob. 72PCh. 5 - Prob. 73PCh. 5 - Prob. 74PCh. 5 - Prob. 75PCh. 5 - Prob. 76PCh. 5 - Prob. 77PCh. 5 - Prob. 78PCh. 5 - Prob. 79PCh. 5 - Prob. 80PCh. 5 - Prob. 81PCh. 5 - Prob. 82PCh. 5 - Prob. 83PCh. 5 - Prob. 84PCh. 5 - Prob. 85PCh. 5 - Prob. 86PCh. 5 - Prob. 87PCh. 5 - Prob. 88PCh. 5 - Prob. 89PCh. 5 - Prob. 90PCh. 5 - Prob. 91PCh. 5 - Prob. 92PCh. 5 - Prob. 93PCh. 5 - Prob. 94PCh. 5 - Prob. 95PCh. 5 - Prob. 96PCh. 5 - Prob. 97PCh. 5 - Prob. 98PCh. 5 - Prob. 99PCh. 5 - Prob. 100PCh. 5 - Prob. 101P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- 2. Another issue facing millennials is the growing income and wealth inequality. We will use our model to understand the implications of this issue. A. Begin from the baseline preferences and endowments. Assume Xavier is wealthier than Yuri. Xavier has an endowment of 1100 pounds for each period (E1=E2=1100). Yuri has an endowment of only 900 pounds in each period (E1=E2=900). Note that each period's market supply is unchanged (1100 + 900 = 1000 + 1000 = = 2000). Determine the equilibrium interest rate. r = % B. Begin from the baseline preferences and endowments. Assume Yuri is wealthier than Xavier. Xavier has an endowment of only 900 pounds in each period (E1=E2=900). Yuri has an endowment of 1100 pounds for each period (E1=E2=1100). Note that each period's market supply is unchanged (1100 + 900 = 1000 + 1000 = 2000). Determine the equilibrium interest rate. r = % C. Begin from the baseline preferences and endowments. A third person named Zena joins our economy. Zena is very…arrow_forwardUse the figure below to answer the following question. Let I represent Income when health, let Is represent income when ill. Let E[I] represent expected income. Point D represents Utility 100000 B у いいつ income есва Ін Is the expected utility from income with no insurance an actuarially fair and partial contract an actuarially fair and full contract an actuarially unfair and full contract an actuarially unfair and partial contractarrow_forwardOutline the principles of opportunity cost and comparative advantage. Describe how these principles can be applied to address the scarcity of resources in a real-world scenario involving a company or industry.arrow_forward
- Not use ai pleasearrow_forward3. Consider the case of everyone being wealthier in the future, such as from a positive productivity shock (computers, internet, robotics, AI). A. Begin from the baseline preferences and endowments. Give both people an endowment of 1000 pounds for the first period and 1100 pounds for the second. AI increases the supply of second period goods by 10%. Note that there is now a total of 2000 pounds in the first period and 2200 pounds in the second. Determine the equilibrium interest rate. r = % B. Begin from the baseline preferences and endowments. Give both people an endowment of 1100 pounds for the first and 1100 pounds for the second periods. AI increases the supply in all periods by 10%. Note that there are now 2200 pounds in the first period and 2200 pounds in the second. Determine the equilibrium interest rate. r = % C. Explain how productivity and the real rate are connected. Write at least five sentences.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- Not use ai pleasearrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forwardJim's Bank Account for the Year to 30 April 2008: We will start by calculating the balance of the business bank account, using the transactions provided. Opening Balance: Jim initially deposited €150,000 into his business bank account on 1 May 2007. Transactions: Receipts: Cash Sales (May 2007 to April 2008): €96,000 Credit Sales (Business customers): €19,600 (Note: This amount is not yet received as it is on credit, but it will be included in the Income Statement and not the bank balance at this stage.) Bank receipts from credit customers (amount owed at 30 April 2008): €6,800 Total Receipts:€96,000 (Cash Sales) + €6,800 (credit customer payments) = €102,800 Payments/Expenditures: Lease Payment (Paid in advance for five years): €50,000 Shop Fitting: €10,000 Assistant’s Wages: €250 per month × 12 months = €3,000 Telephone expenses: €800 Heat & Light expenses: €1,000 Jim’s withdrawals for personal expenditure: €1,000 × 12 months = €12,000 Accounting Fee (after the year-end):…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education