Pearson eText Principles of Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
11th Edition
ISBN: 9780135639221
Author: Jay Heizer, Barry Render
Publisher: PEARSON+
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 19P
Summary Introduction
To select: The best decision based on Expected Monetary Value (EMV) criterion at company MD.
Introduction: The Expected Monetary Value (EMV) is a system for calculating the expected returns for certain decisions made by a company.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
MacDonald Products, Inc., of Clarkson, New York, has the option of
(a) proceeding immediately with production of a new top-of-the-line stereo TV that has just completed prototype testing or
(b) having the value analysis team complete a study.
If Ed Lusk, VP for operations, proceeds with the existing prototype (option a), the firm can expect sales to be 100,000 units at $550 each, with a probability of 0.60 and a 0.40 probability of 75,000 at $550. If, however, he uses the value analysis
team (option b), the firm expects sales of 75,000 units at $750, with a probability of 0.70 and a 0.30 probability of 70,000 units at $750. Value engineering, at a cost of $100,000, is only used in option b. Which option has the highest expected
monetary value (EMV)?
The EMV for option a is $
and the EMV for option b is $
Therefore, option
has the highest expected monetary value. (Enter your responses as integers.)
a
uestlon Help
MacDonald Products, Inc., of Clarkson, New York, has the option of
(a) proceeding immediately with production of a new top-of-the-line stereo TV that has just completed prototype testing or
(b) having the value analysis team complete a study.
If Ed Lusk, VP for operations, proceeds with the existing prototype (option a), the firm can expect sales to be 120,000 units at
$580 each, with a probability of 0.41 and a 0.59 probability of 65,000 at $580. If, however, he uses the value analysis team (option
b), the firm expects sales of 85,000 units at $730, with a probability of 0.71 and a 0.29 probability of 65,000 units at $730. Value
engineering, at a cost of $90,000, is only used in option b. Which option has the highest expected monetary value (EMV)?
The EMV for option a is $
and the EMV for option b is $
Therefore, option b
has the highest expected monetary value.
(Enter your responses as integers.)
Please do not give solution in image format thanku
Chapter 5 Solutions
Pearson eText Principles of Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
Ch. 5.S - Prob. 1DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 2DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 3DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 4DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 5DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 6DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 7DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 1PCh. 5.S - Prob. 2PCh. 5.S - Prob. 3P
Ch. 5.S - Prob. 4PCh. 5.S - Prob. 5PCh. 5.S - Prob. 6PCh. 5.S - Prob. 7PCh. 5.S - Prob. 8PCh. 5.S - Prob. 9PCh. 5.S - Prob. 10PCh. 5.S - A Southern Georgia school district is considering...Ch. 5.S - Prob. 12PCh. 5.S - Prob. 13PCh. 5.S - Prob. 14PCh. 5.S - Prob. 15PCh. 5.S - Prob. 16PCh. 5.S - Prob. 17PCh. 5.S - Prob. 18PCh. 5.S - Prob. 19PCh. 5.S - Prob. 1.1VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 1.2VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 1.3VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 2.1VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 2.2VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 2.3VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 3.1VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 3.2VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 3.3VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 3.4VCCh. 5 - Prob. 1EDCh. 5 - Prob. 1DQCh. 5 - What techniques do we use to define a product? ...Ch. 5 - Prob. 3DQCh. 5 - Prob. 4DQCh. 5 - Prob. 5DQCh. 5 - Prob. 6DQCh. 5 - Describe four organizational approaches to product...Ch. 5 - Explain what is meant by robust design.Ch. 5 - Prob. 9DQCh. 5 - What information is contained in a bill of...Ch. 5 - What information is contained in an engineering...Ch. 5 - What information is contained in an assembly...Ch. 5 - Prob. 13DQCh. 5 - Explain how the house of quality translates...Ch. 5 - Prob. 15DQCh. 5 - Prob. 16DQCh. 5 - Why are the direct interaction and surrogate...Ch. 5 - Prob. 18DQCh. 5 - Prob. 1PCh. 5 - Prob. 2PCh. 5 - Prob. 3PCh. 5 - Construct a house of quality matrix for a...Ch. 5 - Prob. 5PCh. 5 - Prob. 6PCh. 5 - Prob. 7PCh. 5 - Prob. 8PCh. 5 - Prepare a bill of material for (a) a pair of...Ch. 5 - Prob. 10PCh. 5 - Prepare a script for telephone callers at the...Ch. 5 - Prob. 12PCh. 5 - Prob. 13PCh. 5 - Prob. 14PCh. 5 - Prob. 15PCh. 5 - Prob. 16PCh. 5 - Prob. 17PCh. 5 - Prob. 18PCh. 5 - Prob. 19PCh. 5 - Residents of Mill River have fond memories of ice...Ch. 5 - Prob. 21PCh. 5 - Prob. 22PCh. 5 - Prob. 23PCh. 5 - Prob. 24PCh. 5 - Prob. 25PCh. 5 - Prob. 1CSCh. 5 - Prob. 2CSCh. 5 - Prob. 3CSCh. 5 - Prob. 1VCCh. 5 - Prob. 2VCCh. 5 - Prob. 3VCCh. 5 - Prob. 4VC
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forward
- Perform a "product-by-value" analysis on products A, B, C, D, and E. A $0.85 B $0.55 Total Contribution $117,000 $87,000 $54,000 C $1.05 Unit Contribution S The list of products in descending order of their individual dollar contribution to the firm: The list of products in descending order of their total dollar contribution to the firm: Based on the product-by-value" analysis, which products are the 3 lowest in total dollar contribution and, therefore, possible candidates for replacement? should be investigated for replacement Products D $1.65 $61,000 E $0.85 $76,000arrow_forwardWhat are four types of feasibility? Which type focuses on total cost of ownership? Which type is influenced primarily by users?arrow_forwardPlease do not give solution in image format thankuarrow_forward
- Merrimac Manufacturing Company has always purchased acertain component part from a supplier on the East Coast for$50 per part. The supplier is reliable and has maintained thesame price structure for years. Recently, improvements in operations and reduced product demand have cleared up somecapacity in Merrimac’s own plant for producing componentparts. The particular part in question could be produced at$40 per part, with an annual fixed investment of $25,000.Currently, Merrimac needs 300 of these parts per year.a. Should Merrimac make or buy the component part?b. As another alternative, a new supplier located nearby isoffering volume discounts for new customers of $50per part for the first 100 parts ordered and $45 per partfor each additional unit ordered. Should Merrimacmake the component in-house, buy it from the newsupplier, or stick with the old supplier?c. Would your decision change if Merrimac’s annual demand increased to 2000 parts? increased to 5000 parts?d. Develop a set of…arrow_forwardRitz Products’s materials manager, Tej Dhakar,must determine whether to make or buy a new semiconduc-tor for the wrist TV that the firm is about to produce. Onemillion units are expected to be produced over the life cycle.If the product is made, start-up and production costs of themake decision total $1 million, with a probability of .4 thatthe product will be satisfactory and a .6 probability that itwill not. If the product is not satisfactory, the firm will haveto reevaluate the decision. If the decision is reevaluated, thechoice will be whether to spend another $1 million to redesignthe semiconductor or to purchase. Likelihood of success thesecond time that the make decision is made is .9. If the secondmake decision also fails, the firm must purchase. Regardlessof when the purchase takes place, Dhakar’s best judgment ofcost is that Ritz will pay $.50 for each purchased semiconduc-tor plus $1 million in vendor development cost.a) Assuming that Ritz must have the semiconductor…arrow_forwardGive typed answer 1 hour I will give good rating?arrow_forward
- Book pdf : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ojDaUwQu0gxTIn7oJnINvLmeqv5_FMz7/view?usp=drivesdk Question as in the attached photo from page 218 Question 5 Note: Give full explanation with clear indication to the problem’s aspect. Use information provided in table 7.8 , 7.7 (*) Use the weighted-point evaluation system to cal- culate weighted performance scores for each of the software firms. Would the results change if each dimension had a weight of one-third? (**) In Chapter 2, we described order qualifiers as per- formance dimensions on which customers demand a minimum level of performance. Basically, if a supplier fails to meet the minimum requirements on any of the qualifiers, that supplier would be eliminated from contention. How would you incorporate the concept of order qualifiers into the weighted-point evaluation system?arrow_forwardMerrimac Manufacturing Company has always purchased acertain component part from a supplier on the East Coast for$50 per part. The supplier is reliable and has maintained the same price structure for years. Recently, improvements in op-erations and reduced product demand have cleared up some capacity in Merrimac’s own plant for producing componentparts. The particular part in question could be produced at$40 per part, with an annual fixed investment of $25,000.Currently, Merrimac needs 300 of these parts per year.a. Should Merrimac make or buy the component part?b. As another alternative, a new supplier located nearby isoffering volume discounts for new customers of $50per part for the first 100 parts ordered and $45 per partfor each additional unit ordered. Should Merrimacmake the component in-house, buy it from the newsupplier, or stick with the old supplier? c. Would your decision change if Merrimac’s annual de-mand increased to 2000 parts? increased to 5000 parts? d. Develop a set…arrow_forwardWrite a 1,750- to 2,100-word executive summaryin which you complete the following: QUESTION TITLE :- HCS 451 Risk and Quality Management Assessment Summaryarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning