a.
Draw a
a.
Answer to Problem 18CRE
The scatterplot for the data is obtained as follows:
The relationship between the variables is nonlinear.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The data on success (%), y and energy of shock, x is given.
Scatterplot:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to draw the scatterplot using MINITAB software is given below:
- Choose Graph > Scatterplot.
- Choose Simple, and then click OK.
- Enter the column of y under Y variables.
- Enter the column of x under X variables.
- Click OK.
Thus, the scatterplot is obtained.
A careful observation of the scatterplot reveals that for lower values of x, the points are close to being linear. However, the curvature in the distribution of the points gradually increases with increasing values of x.
Thus, the relationship between the variables is nonlinear.
b.
Fit a least-squares regression line to the data.
Construct a residual plot for the model.
Explain whether the residual plot supports the conclusion in Part a.
b.
Answer to Problem 18CRE
The least-squares regression line for the data is
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The least-squares regression line can be obtained using software.
Regression:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to get regression equation using MINITAB software is given as,
- Choose Stat > Regression > Regression > Fit Regression Model.
- Under Responses, enter the column of y.
- Under Continuous predictors, enter the columns of x.
- Choose Results and select Analysis of Variance, Model Summary, Coefficients, Regression Equation.
- Choose Graphs, under Residual versus the variables, enter x.
- Click OK on all dialogue boxes.
The outputs using MINITAB software is given as follows:
Residual plot:
From the output, the least-squares regression line is:
The ideal residual plot for a linear regression model must not show any pattern and must be randomly distributed. However, this residual plot clearly shows a curved pattern, with an approximate inverted U-shape. This suggests that the data is not linearly distributed.
Thus, the residual plot supports the conclusion in Part a.
c.
Justify whether the transformation
c.
Answer to Problem 18CRE
The transformation
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The suitable transformation can be identified by constructing scatterplot between y and
Consider the transformed variable,
Data transformation
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to transform the data using MINITAB software is given below:
- Choose Calc > Calculator.
- Enter the column of sqrt(x) under Store result in variable.
- Enter the formula SQRT(‘x’) under Expression.
- Click OK.
The transformed variable is stored in the column sqrt(x).
Scatterplot:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to draw the scatterplot using MINITAB software is given below:
- Choose Graph > Scatterplot.
- Choose Simple, and then click OK.
- Enter the column of y under Y variables.
- Enter the column of sqrt(x) under X variables.
- Click OK.
The output obtained using MINITAB is as follows:
Consider the transformed variable,
Data transformation
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to transform the data using MINITAB software is given below:
- Choose Calc > Calculator.
- Enter the column of sqrt(x) under Store result in variable.
- Enter the formula LOGTEN(‘x’) under Expression.
- Click OK.
The transformed variable is stored in the column log(x).
Scatterplot:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to draw the scatterplot using MINITAB software is given below:
- Choose Graph > Scatterplot.
- Choose Simple, and then click OK.
- Enter the column of y under Y variables.
- Enter the column of log(x) under X variables.
- Click OK.
The output obtained using MINITAB is as follows:
A careful observation of the scatterplot between y and
On the other hand, the scatterplot between y and
Thus, the transformation
d.
Find the least-squares regression line between y and the transformation recommended in the previous part.
d.
Answer to Problem 18CRE
The least-squares regression equation between y and the transformation recommended in the previous part, that is,
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The least-squares regression line can be obtained using software.
Regression:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to get regression equation using MINITAB software is given as,
- Choose Stat > Regression > Regression > Fit Regression Model.
- Under Responses, enter the column of y.
- Under Continuous predictors, enter the columns of log(x).
- Choose Results and select Analysis of Variance, Model Summary, Coefficients, Regression Equation.
- Click OK on all dialogue boxes.
The outputs using MINITAB software is given as follows:
From the output, the least-squares regression equation between y and the transformation recommended in the previous part, that is,
e.
Predict the success for an energy shock 1.75 times the threshold.
Predict the success for an energy shock 0.8 times the threshold.
e.
Answer to Problem 18CRE
The success for an energy shock 1.75 times the threshold is 86.98%.
The success for an energy shock 0.8 times the threshold is 52.63%.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The energy of shock is given as a multiple of the threshold of defibrillation.
For an energy shock 1.75 times the threshold,
Thus, the success for an energy shock 1.75 times the threshold is 86.98%.
For an energy shock 0.8 times the threshold,
Thus, the success for an energy shock 0.8 times the threshold is 52.63%.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 5 Solutions
Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis
- PLS ANSWERarrow_forwardAn article in Technometrics (1974, Vol. 16, pp. 523–531) considered the following stack-loss data from a plant oxidizing ammonia to nitric acid. Twenty-one daily responses of stack loss (the amount of ammonia escaping) were measured with air flow x1, temperature x2, and acid concentration x3. y = 42, 37, 37, 28, 18, 18, 19, 20, 15, 14, 14, 13, 11, 12, 8, 7, 8, 8, 9, 15, 15 x1 = 80, 80, 75, 62, 62, 62, 62, 62, 58, 58, 58, 58, 58, 58, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 56, 70 x2 = 27, 27, 25, 24, 22, 23, 24, 24, 23, 18, 18, 17, 18, 19, 18, 18, 19, 19, 20, 20, 20 x3 = 89, 88, 90, 87, 87, 87, 93, 93, 87, 80, 89, 88, 82, 93, 89, 86, 72, 79, 80, 82, 91 (a) Fit a linear regression model relating the results of the stack loss to the three regressor variables. (b) Estimate σ2. (c) Find the standard error se(βj). (d) Use the model in part (a) to predict stack loss when x1 = 60, x2 = 26, and x3 = 85.arrow_forwardThe spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula, is an invasive species to the United States that has the potential to do significant agricultural damage. An ecologist is studying the relationship between the size of the female spotted lanternflies and the number of eggs they produce. The data are summarized below. Length of insect: AVG = 1 inch, SD = 0.15 inchNumber of eggs: AVG = 40 eggs, SD = 5 eggsr = 0.2 Using regression, we can say that the average number of eggs produced by female spotted lanternflies who are 1.1 inch long is closest to... Group of answer choices 42 39 40 41arrow_forward
- An article in the journal Air and Waste (Update on Ozone Trends in California's South Coast Air Basin, Vol. 43, 1993) investigated the ozone levels in the South Coast Air Basin of California for the years 1976-1991. The author believes that the number of days the ozone levels exceeded 0.20 ppm (the response) depends on the seasonal meteorological index, which is the seasonal average 850-millibar Temperature (the predictor). The following table gives the data. Year Index 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 Days 91 105 106 108 88 91 58 82 81 65 61 48 61 43 33 36 16.7 17.1 18.2 18.1 17.2 18.2 16.0 17.2 18.0 17.2 16.9 17.1 18.2 17.3 17.5 16.6 (a) Construct a scatter diagram of the data. (b) Estimate the prediction equation. (c) Test for significance of regression. (d) Calculate the 95% CI and PI on for a seasonal meteorological index value of 17. Interpret these quantities.arrow_forwardAn article in Journal of Food Science [“Prevention of Potato Spoilage During Storage by Chlorine Dioxide” (2001, Vol. 66(3), pp. 472–477)] reported on a study of potato spoilage based on different conditions of acidified oxine (AO), which is a mixture of chlorite and chlorine dioxide. The data follow: ∑X1i=230, ∑X21i=17200, n1=3. ∑X2i=150, ∑X22i=8100, n2=3. ∑X3i=60, ∑X23i=4500, n3=3. ∑X4i=65, ∑X24i=1625, n4=3. where group 1 has AO = 50ppm, group 2 has AO = 100ppm, group 3 has AO = 200ppm, group 4 has AO = 400ppm. Complete the ANOVA table below Source df sum of square mean square F p-value Between Within N/A N/A Total 11 N/A N/A N/A At α=0.05, do we reject the null hypothesis that AO does not affect spoilage?arrow_forwardThe article "Characteristics and Trends of River Discharge into Hudson, James, and Ungava Bays, 1964-2000" (S. Dery, M. Stieglitz, et al., Journal of Climate, 2005:2540-2557) presents measurements of discharge rate x (in kmlyr) andpeakflow y (in m/s) for 42 rivers that drain into the Hudson, James, and Ungava Bays. The data are shown in the following table: Discharge Peak Flow 94.24 4110.3 66.57 4961.7 59.79 10275.5 48.52 6616.9 40.00 7459.5 32.30 2784.4 31.20 3266.7 30.69 4368.7 26.65 1328.5 22.75 4437.6 21.20 1983.0 20.57 1320.1 19.77 1735.7 18.62 1944.1 17.96 3420.2 17.84 2655.3 16.06 3470.3 1561.6 14.69 11.63 869.8 11.19 936.8 11.08 1315.7 10.92 1727.1 9.94 768.1 7.86 483.3arrow_forward
- In a study of ground motion caused by earthquakes, the peak velocity (in m/s) and peak acceleration (in m/s2) were recorded for five earthquakes. The results are presented in the following table. Velocity 1.54 1.6 0.95 1.3 2.92 Acceleration 7.64 8.04 8.14 6.37 3.25 Compute the correlation coefficient between peak velocity and peak acceleration.arrow_forwardMist (airborne droplets or aerosols) is generated when metal- removing fluids are used in machining operations to cool and lubricate the tool and workpiece. Mist generation is a concern to OSHA, which has recently lowered substantially the workplace standard. The article "Variables Affecting Mist Generaton from Metal Removal Fluids" (Lubrication Engr., 2002: 10-17) gave the accompanying data on x = fluid-flow velocity for a 5% soluble oil (cm/sec) and y = the extent of mist droplets having diameters smaller than 10 μm (mg/m³): x y 89 177 189 354 362 442 965 .40 .60 .48 .66 .61 .69 .99 a. The investigators performed a simple linear regres- sion analysis to relate the two variables. Does a scat- terplot of the data support this strategy? b. What proportion of observed variation in mist can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between velocity and mist? c. The investigators were particularly interested in the impact on mist of increasing velocity from 100 to 1000 (a…arrow_forwardThe efficiency ratio for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in mg/ft2). The article “Statistical Process Control of a Phosphate Coating Line” (Wire J. Intl., May 1997: 78–81) gave the accompanying data on tank temperature (x) and efficiency ratio (y).Temp. 170 172 173 174 174 175 176Ratio .84 1.31 1.42 1.03 1.07 1.08 1.04Temp. 177 180 180 180 180 180 181Ratio 1.80 1.45 1.60 1.61 2.13 2.15 .84Temp. 181 182 182 182 182 184 184Ratio 1.43 .90 1.81 1.94 2.68 1.49 2.52Temp. 185 186 188Ratio 3.00 1.87 3.08a. Construct stem-and-leaf displays of both temperature and efficiency ratio, and comment on interesting features.b. Is the value of efficiency ratio completely and uniquely determined by tank temperature? Explain your reasoning.c. Construct a scatterplot of the data. Does it appear that efficiency ratio could be very well predicted by the value of temperature? Explain your reasoning.arrow_forward
- Cell Phone Radiation Listed below are the measured radiation absorption rates (in W/kg) corresponding to these cell phones: iPhone 5S, BlackBerry Z30, Sanyo Vero, Optimus V, Droid Razr, Nokia N97, Samsung Vibrant, Sony Z750a, Kyocera Kona, LG G2, and Virgin Mobile Supreme. The data are from the Federal Communications Commission.arrow_forwardThe depth of wetting of a soil is the depth to which water content will increase owing to extemal factors. The article "Discussion of Method for Evaluation of Depth of Wetting in Residential Areas" (J. Nelson, K. Chao, and D. Overton, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2011:293-296) discusses the relationship between depth of wetting beneath a structure and the age of the structure. The article presents measurements of depth of wetting, in meters, and the ages, in years, of 21 houses, as shown in the following table. Age Depth 7.6 4 4.6 6.1 9.1 3 4.3 7.3 5.2 10.4 15.5 5.8 10.7 4 5.5 6.1 10.7 10.4 4.6 7.0 6.1 14 16.8 10 9.1 8.8 Compute the least-squares line for predicting depth of wetting (y) from age (x). b. Identify a point with an unusually large x-value. Compute the least-squares line that results from deletion of this point. Identify another point which can be classified as an outlier. Compute the least-squares line that results from deletion of the outlier,…arrow_forwardA paper gives data on x = change in Body Mass Index (BMI, in kilograms/meter) and y = change in a measure of depression for patients suffering from depression who participated in a pulmonary rehabilitation program. The table below contains a subset of the data given in the paper and are approximate values read from a scatterplot in the paper. BMI Change (kg/m2) 0.7 0.8 1 1.5 1.2 1 0.4 0.4 0.5 -0.5 0.1 Depression Score Change -1 | 4 5 8 13 14| 17| 18| 12 14 The accompanying computer output is from Minitab. Fitted Line Plot Depression score change = 6.512 + 5.472 BMI change 5.26270 20 - R-Sq R-Sq (adj) 19.88% 27.16% 15- 10-. 5- -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 BMI change 5.26270 27.166 Coefficients Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF Constant 6.512 2.26 2.88 0.0164 BMI change 5.472 2.83 1.93 0.0823 1.00 Regression Equation Depression score change = 6.512 + 5.472 EMI change (a) What percentage of observed variation in depression score change can be explained by the simple linear regression model?…arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill