
Concept explainers
A physicist wants to estimate the rate of emissions of alpha particles from a certain source. He makes two counts. First, he measures the background rate by counting the number of particles in 100 seconds in the absence of the source. He counts 36 background emissions. Then, with the source present, he counts 324 emissions in 100 seconds. This represents the sum of source emissions plus background emissions.
- a. Estimate the background rate, in emissions per second, and find the uncertainty in the estimate.
- b. Estimate the sum of the source plus background rate, in emissions per second, and find the uncertainty in the estimate.
- c. Estimate the rate of source emissions in particles per second, and find the uncertainty in the estimate.
- d. Which will provide the smaller uncertainty in estimating the rate of emissions from the source: (1) counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds, or (2) counting the background for 100 seconds and the source plus the background for 200 seconds? Compute the uncertainty in each case.
- e. Is it possible to reduce the uncertainty to 0.03 particles per second if the background rate is measured for only 100 seconds? If so, for how long must the source plus background be measured? If not, explain why not.
a.

Estimate the background rate in emissions per second.
Find the uncertainty in the estimate.
Answer to Problem 20E
The estimate of the background rate in emissions per second is 0.36
The uncertainty in the estimate is 0.06.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
There are 36 background emissions in 100 seconds in the absence of source and 324 emissions in the presence of source.
Calculation:
The random variables X is defined as the number of background events counted in 100 seconds. The background rate is denoted as
The estimate
The sample concentration
Substitute
Thus, the estimate is 0.36.
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the estimate is 0.06.
b.

Estimate the sum of the source plus background rate in emissions per second.
Find the uncertainty in the estimate.
Answer to Problem 20E
The estimate of the sum of the source plus background rate in emissions per second is 3.24.
The uncertainty in the estimate is 0.18.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The random variable Y is defined as the numbers of events both background and source counted in 100 seconds.
The estimate
Then Y follows Poisson with parameter,
The sample concentration
Substitute
Thus, the estimate is 3.24.
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the estimate is 0.18.
c.

Estimate the rate of source emissions in particles per second and find the uncertainty in the estimate.
Answer to Problem 20E
The estimate of rate of source emissions in particles per second is 2.88.
The uncertainty in the estimate is 0.19
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The source rate is denoted as as
The rate of source emissions in particles per second is,
The sample concentration
Substitute
Thus, the estimate is 2.88.
Both
The uncertainty in
Substitute
Thus, the uncertainty in the estimate is 0.19.
d.

Identify which will provide the smaller uncertainty in estimating the rate of emissions from the source, counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds or counting the background for 100 seconds and the source plus the background for 200 seconds.
Compute the uncertainty in each case.
Answer to Problem 20E
The counting the background only for 100 seconds and the background plus the source for 200 seconds has smaller uncertainty than counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds.
The uncertainty in the case of counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds is 0.15.
The uncertainty in the case of counting the background only for 100 seconds and the background plus the source for 200 seconds is 0.14.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Case 1:
If counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds.
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the
Then,
Substitute
Thus, the uncertainty in this case is 0.15.
Case 2:
If counting the background only for 100 seconds and the background plus the source for 200 seconds.
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the
Then,
Substitute
Thus, the uncertainty in this case is 0.14.
Thus, it can be seen that the counting the background only for 100 seconds and the background plus the source for 200 seconds has smaller uncertainty than counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds.
e.

Check whether it is possible to reduce the uncertainty to 0.03 particles per second if the background rate is measured for only 100 seconds. If so find how long must be the source plus background be measured. If not, explain the reason.
Answer to Problem 20E
It is not possible to reduce the uncertainty to 0.03 particles per second if the background rate is measured for only 100 seconds.
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
If the background emissions are counted for 100 seconds and the source plus background is counted for N seconds.
Then uncertainty in the estimate of the source rate is,
If one increase the value of N then the estimate of the source rate must be greater than
Thus, an estimate of source rate must be always greater than 0.03.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
Statistics for Engineers and Scientists
- if the b coloumn of a z table disappeared what would be used to determine b column probabilitiesarrow_forwardConstruct a model of population flow between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas of a given country, given that their respective populations in 2015 were 263 million and 45 million. The probabilities are given by the following matrix. (from) (to) metro nonmetro 0.99 0.02 metro 0.01 0.98 nonmetro Predict the population distributions of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas for the years 2016 through 2020 (in millions, to four decimal places). (Let x, through x5 represent the years 2016 through 2020, respectively.) x₁ = x2 X3 261.27 46.73 11 259.59 48.41 11 257.96 50.04 11 256.39 51.61 11 tarrow_forwardIf the average price of a new one family home is $246,300 with a standard deviation of $15,000 find the minimum and maximum prices of the houses that a contractor will build to satisfy 88% of the market valuearrow_forward
- 21. ANALYSIS OF LAST DIGITS Heights of statistics students were obtained by the author as part of an experiment conducted for class. The last digits of those heights are listed below. Construct a frequency distribution with 10 classes. Based on the distribution, do the heights appear to be reported or actually measured? Does there appear to be a gap in the frequencies and, if so, how might that gap be explained? What do you know about the accuracy of the results? 3 4 555 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 23 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 8 8 8 9arrow_forwardA side view of a recycling bin lid is diagramed below where two panels come together at a right angle. 45 in 24 in Width? — Given this information, how wide is the recycling bin in inches?arrow_forward1 No. 2 3 4 Binomial Prob. X n P Answer 5 6 4 7 8 9 10 12345678 8 3 4 2 2552 10 0.7 0.233 0.3 0.132 7 0.6 0.290 20 0.02 0.053 150 1000 0.15 0.035 8 7 10 0.7 0.383 11 9 3 5 0.3 0.132 12 10 4 7 0.6 0.290 13 Poisson Probability 14 X lambda Answer 18 4 19 20 21 22 23 9 15 16 17 3 1234567829 3 2 0.180 2 1.5 0.251 12 10 0.095 5 3 0.101 7 4 0.060 3 2 0.180 2 1.5 0.251 24 10 12 10 0.095arrow_forward
- step by step on Microssoft on how to put this in excel and the answers please Find binomial probability if: x = 8, n = 10, p = 0.7 x= 3, n=5, p = 0.3 x = 4, n=7, p = 0.6 Quality Control: A factory produces light bulbs with a 2% defect rate. If a random sample of 20 bulbs is tested, what is the probability that exactly 2 bulbs are defective? (hint: p=2% or 0.02; x =2, n=20; use the same logic for the following problems) Marketing Campaign: A marketing company sends out 1,000 promotional emails. The probability of any email being opened is 0.15. What is the probability that exactly 150 emails will be opened? (hint: total emails or n=1000, x =150) Customer Satisfaction: A survey shows that 70% of customers are satisfied with a new product. Out of 10 randomly selected customers, what is the probability that at least 8 are satisfied? (hint: One of the keyword in this question is “at least 8”, it is not “exactly 8”, the correct formula for this should be = 1- (binom.dist(7, 10, 0.7,…arrow_forwardKate, Luke, Mary and Nancy are sharing a cake. The cake had previously been divided into four slices (s1, s2, s3 and s4). What is an example of fair division of the cake S1 S2 S3 S4 Kate $4.00 $6.00 $6.00 $4.00 Luke $5.30 $5.00 $5.25 $5.45 Mary $4.25 $4.50 $3.50 $3.75 Nancy $6.00 $4.00 $4.00 $6.00arrow_forwardFaye cuts the sandwich in two fair shares to her. What is the first half s1arrow_forward
- Question 2. An American option on a stock has payoff given by F = f(St) when it is exercised at time t. We know that the function f is convex. A person claims that because of convexity, it is optimal to exercise at expiration T. Do you agree with them?arrow_forwardQuestion 4. We consider a CRR model with So == 5 and up and down factors u = 1.03 and d = 0.96. We consider the interest rate r = 4% (over one period). Is this a suitable CRR model? (Explain your answer.)arrow_forwardQuestion 3. We want to price a put option with strike price K and expiration T. Two financial advisors estimate the parameters with two different statistical methods: they obtain the same return rate μ, the same volatility σ, but the first advisor has interest r₁ and the second advisor has interest rate r2 (r1>r2). They both use a CRR model with the same number of periods to price the option. Which advisor will get the larger price? (Explain your answer.)arrow_forward
- Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)TrigonometryISBN:9781337278461Author:Ron LarsonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1AlgebraISBN:9780395977224Author:Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. ColePublisher:McDougal LittellAlgebra & Trigonometry with Analytic GeometryAlgebraISBN:9781133382119Author:SwokowskiPublisher:Cengage




