
Alicia and Rafel are in the process of negotiating a divorce agreement to be finalized in 2019. They both worked during the marriage and contributed an equal amount to the marital assets. They own a home with a fair market value of $400,000 (cost of $300,000) that is subject to a mortgage of $250,000. They have lived in the home for 12 years. They also have investment assets with a cost of $160,000 and a fair market value of $410,000. Thus, the net worth of the couple is $560,000 ($400,000 − $250,000 + $410,000). The holding period for the investments is longer than one year. Alicia would like to continue to live in the house. Therefore, she has proposed that she receive the residence subject to the mortgage, a net value of $150,000. In addition, she would receive $17,600 each year for the next 10 years, which has a present value (at 6% interest) of $130,000. Rafel would receive the investment assets. If Rafel accepts this plan, he must sell one-half of the investments so that he can purchase a home. Assume that you are counseling Alicia. Explain to Alicia whether the proposed agreement would be “fair” on an after-tax basis.

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Chapter 4 Solutions
Individual Income Taxes
- Reffering to fair value of an asset, division, or organization, What exactly is fair value and how is it assessed?arrow_forwardThe following transactions involving intangible assets of Oriole Corporation occurred on or near December 31, 2025. 1.) Oriole paid Grand Company $520,000 for the exclusive right to market a particular product, using the Grand name and logo in promotional material. The franchise runs for as long as Oriole is in business. 2.) Oriole spent $654,000 developing a new manufacturing process. It has applied for a patent, and it believes that its application will be successful. 3.) In January 2026, Oriole's application for a patent (#2 above) was granted. Legal and registration costs incurred were $247,800. The patent runs for 20 years. The manufacturing process will be useful to Oriole for 10 years. 4.) Oriole incurred $168,000 in successfully defending one of its patents in an infringement suit. The patent expires during December 2029. Oriole incurred 5.) $446,400 in an unsuccessful patent defense. As a result of the adverse verdict, the patent, with a remaining unamortized cost of…arrow_forwardNonearrow_forward
- I need help solving this general accounting question with the proper methodology.arrow_forwardI need help with this general accounting question using the proper accounting approach.arrow_forwardPlease provide the correct answer to this general accounting problem using valid calculations.arrow_forward
- Can you explain the correct methodology to solve this general accounting problem?arrow_forwardCan you solve this general accounting question with the appropriate accounting analysis techniques?arrow_forwardCan you solve this general accounting problem using appropriate accounting principles?arrow_forward
- Individual Income TaxesAccountingISBN:9780357109731Author:HoffmanPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
